</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by JD Heel:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> b) No, but it's better than striking a girl with a balled fist. Also, in rare but some circumstances, hitting women isn't wrong.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Hitting a girl is hitting a girl, plain and simple. I don't want to hear anyone call one way to do it "better" than another -- whether it inflicts more damage or not.
As for the second part of your statement, I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with it... but I want to hear your explanation on that one. I'm assuming you mean the rare instances where a man is abused by a woman (extremely rare, too). I can guarantee you that Casey Sanders is strong enough to defend himself, though -- which means he shouldn't lay a hand on a girl.
-JD</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I don't know what happened in his situation. Chances are he was in the wrong, in fact, I think lesser of him for the fact that he didn't just turn the other cheek, even if it was provoked.
And... the circumstance would be if a man feels sincerely physically threatened, he has a right to defend himself. Other than that, no one should be hitting anyone, especially females.
|