Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

09-08-2002 09:35 AM

Go Tigers! My second favorite team this week.

09-08-2002 09:40 AM

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! No way!

Yes, Clemson is a good team. Yes, Clemson has a chance. No, they won't win by 17.

The last 6 games have been decided by 3 pts each.

My pick: Tech wins another close one, 20-14.

09-08-2002 11:23 AM

This is a huge game. Just my opinion but the winner of this game finishes 2nd in the ACC (if not first). It's hard to start up in the ACC 0-1.

Two very talented and very young teams so mistakes should determine this game

Clemson 30
GT 27

It has to be by 3 points.

And way to go UVA. Nice job of putting the gamecocks in there place, even with the refs trying to give the game to USC.

09-08-2002 04:24 PM

nope nope nope

Dawg, you got it ALL mixed up.

You forgot to swap those, its supposed to be:

GT-34 Clemson-17

09-08-2002 08:12 PM

Seems like you guys are right about this being a 3 point game, early Vegas line has the Jackets as a 2.5 point underdog to the Tigers.

09-08-2002 08:58 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Dawg Quixote:
Seems like you guys are right about this being a 3 point game, early Vegas line has the Jackets as a 2.5 point underdog to the Tigers.<hr /></blockquote>I'll take that!

09-08-2002 09:30 PM

Aren't you insulted since you are ranked as the 29th best team in the country? LOL

09-09-2002 02:03 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Dawg Quixote:
Aren't you insulted since you are ranked as the 29th best team in the country? LOL<hr /></blockquote>and aren't you a little cocky, considering you squeaked by this same unranked clemson team by just 3 points on your own nasty field, while being ranked, what was it at game time, #9, or #11, something like that?
they are quite a bit tougher at death valley.
no doubt you would have lost there.....
tech/clemson will be a very good game, and we've played them as close, win or lose, the past few years, as you did 2 weeks ago.
maybe you should concentrate on how this is "the dawgs'year" to challange for the sec (again, yawn, sigh, until you lose to either florida or tennessee or alabama or mississippi or auburn like you always do, oh, or maybe even kentucky...

09-09-2002 05:35 AM

Finally, I got a Tech fan upset! I was starting to get discouraged.

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

09-09-2002 11:01 AM

Should be a great game, the winner will definately crack the top 25. I say this one is gonna be too close for me to predict, but since it's in the VALLEY we have the edge.

UGA vs. USC should be interesting!

09-09-2002 03:10 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Dawg Quixote:
Finally, I got a Tech fan upset! I was starting to get discouraged.

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> <hr /></blockquote>you lack the intelligence to make my angry.
all you got was a response.

09-09-2002 03:24 PM

Consider this my apology, that came off a little more mean spirited that I like. As a matter of fact, with the loss of the Clemson's best receiver and Hollins recent break out performances, and Tech's defense....Tech ought to win that game.

(You have no idea how painful that was).

<img border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" title="" src="graemlins/banghead.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />

09-09-2002 08:33 PM

Loss of our best receiver? We have only lost a CB and OT so far. They say WR Hamilton is questionable - just like he was against UGA....right.

09-09-2002 08:41 PM

I thought I read someplace that one of your top WR was out for the Tech game....anyway, those receivers in the Georgia game had hands of stone. If they had of caught half of Simmons passes ::::shudder:::: I don't even want to think about it.

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />

09-10-2002 03:26 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Dawg Quixote:
Consider this my apology,...

(You have no idea how painful that was).

<img border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" title="" src="graemlins/banghead.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <hr /></blockquote>What?!?! A hint of humility from within the <img border="0" alt="[Puke]" title="" src="graemlins/puke.gif" /> "Bulldawg Nation"???!!!

Somebody wake me up when this is over... <img border="0" alt="[snore]" title="" src="graemlins/snore.gif" />

09-10-2002 03:29 PM

lol - Dawg Quixote - you may want to print out some of those flyers from the 6 mo. anniversary thread --- I'd say you're still outnumbered at least 10:1 -- maybe 15:1. There are a shocking number of Techies in the woodwork around here <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="smile.gif" />

09-10-2002 04:13 PM

Racket, not humility...rather it is called class (on rare occassion).

GTS, okay I'll beat the bushes for some more allies.

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="smile.gif" />

09-11-2002 07:27 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Dawg Quixote:
not humility...rather it is called class <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="smile.gif" /> <hr /></blockquote><img border="0" alt="[laugh]" title="" src="graemlins/laughing.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[laugh]" title="" src="graemlins/laughing.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[laugh]" title="" src="graemlins/laughing.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[laugh]" title="" src="graemlins/laughing.gif" />

09-11-2002 10:48 AM

09-11-2002 11:47 AM

One great thing for Clemson is that we have already been tested with decent competition, and heldup very well. GT on the other hand has not...

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode CU - 34, GT - 17
Author	Message