Stammers, you are still an idiot. Let me describe your MO. One, manipulate some facts and statements that "support" your argument. Ignore anything positive about UT like the Plague. Then, throw in a couple of insults, claim how much smarter you are and how stupid everyone else is, with the particular poster you are addressing being the dumbest person alive (Until you address the next person). After that, ask a third grader to come up with a name for the particular poster. Then, repeat the same tired refrain about "POS, UTLofton, imbecile, Bernard King rapist (proof?)etc., etc."

By the way, regarding your stats for UT tournament victories from 1939-1983 being only 5 victories, you show your complete incompetance in analyzing any piece of information and your manipulation of stats I note above. UT actually had some very good teams in the 60s and 70s, but any person with any semblence of knowledge about the NCAA tournament knows it was much different back then. For one, they only took the conference champion at that time and, in case you weren't aware, we have Kentucky in our conference and lost out on a number of tournament victories because we were not as fortunate as Memphis to play in a weak conference. Secondly, that time period was not the 64 team tournament, either.

Also, last years tournament (in which we overachieved), the Ohio State game was not a choke like the 2000 North Carolina game was. Again, if you possessed any analytical skills at all, or bothered to watch the game, you would see this. In 2000, the team visibly panicked. Last year, the team visibly let their guard down, losing intensity until the momentum brought OSU back. But, again, one more time, when OSU came back and took the lead, UT responded. That's not a choke, dimwit. In 2000, the team did not respond. That's a choke. Get it?

Unimane Wrote:Stammers, you are still an idiot. Let me describe your MO. One, manipulate some facts and statements that "support" your argument. Ignore anything positive about UT like the Plague. Then, throw in a couple of insults, claim how much smarter you are and how stupid everyone else is, with the particular poster you are addressing being the dumbest person alive (Until you address the next person). After that, ask a third grader to come up with a name for the particular poster. Then, repeat the same tired refrain about "POS, UTLofton, imbecile, Bernard King rapist (proof?)etc., etc."

By the way, regarding your stats for UT tournament victories from 1939-1983 being only 5 victories, you show your complete incompetance in analyzing any piece of information and your manipulation of stats I note above. UT actually had some very good teams in the 60s and 70s, but any person with any semblence of knowledge about the NCAA tournament knows it was much different back then. For one, they only took the conference champion at that time and, in case you weren't aware, we have Kentucky in our conference and lost out on a number of tournament victories because we were not as fortunate as Memphis to play in a weak conference. Secondly, that time period was not the 64 team tournament, either.

Also, last years tournament (in which we overachieved), the Ohio State game was not a choke like the 2000 North Carolina game was. Again, if you possessed any analytical skills at all, or bothered to watch the game, you would see this. In 2000, the team visibly panicked. Last year, the team visibly let their guard down, losing intensity until the momentum brought OSU back. But, again, one more time, when OSU came back and took the lead, UT responded. That's not a choke, dimwit. In 2000, the team did not respond. That's a choke. Get it?

Maybe this link will help you out. I don't think Bernie was charged with rape. I think it was "attempted forcible sexual abuse." There is a big difference, I guess.

http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/27/...nets4.html

Unimane Wrote:Stammers, you are still an idiot. Let me describe your MO. One, manipulate some facts and statements that "support" your argument. Ignore anything positive about UT like the Plague. Then, throw in a couple of insults, claim how much smarter you are and how stupid everyone else is, with the particular poster you are addressing being the dumbest person alive (Until you address the next person). After that, ask a third grader to come up with a name for the particular poster. Then, repeat the same tired refrain about "POS, UTLofton, imbecile, Bernard King rapist (proof?)etc., etc."

By the way, regarding your stats for UT tournament victories from 1939-1983 being only 5 victories, you show your complete incompetance in analyzing any piece of information and your manipulation of stats I note above. UT actually had some very good teams in the 60s and 70s, but any person with any semblence of knowledge about the NCAA tournament knows it was much different back then. For one, they only took the conference champion at that time and, in case you weren't aware, we have Kentucky in our conference and lost out on a number of tournament victories because we were not as fortunate as Memphis to play in a weak conference. Secondly, that time period was not the 64 team tournament, either.

Also, last years tournament (in which we overachieved), the Ohio State game was not a choke like the 2000 North Carolina game was. Again, if you possessed any analytical skills at all, or bothered to watch the game, you would see this. In 2000, the team visibly panicked. Last year, the team visibly let their guard down, losing intensity until the momentum brought OSU back. But, again, one more time, when OSU came back and took the lead, UT responded. That's not a choke, dimwit. In 2000, the team did not respond. That's a choke. Get it?

Urineman, your brain damaged remarks are hilarious. You accuse me of manipulating data and in the next breath, state that blowing a 21 point lead is NOT a choke. Only a complete imbecile could be so stupid. Also, although I admire the relentless pursuit of stupidity by all of the UTLofton posters on this board; you are easily the most stupid and brain damaged. Let's be clear clear about that so none of the other UTLofton imbeciles can steal your thunder. For once in your life you are a "winner."

Urineman, when I say that you are the biggest underachieving, choking program in NCAA post season history; I mean it. We've already established that you are the biggest underachieving, choking program in the $EC and the NCAA tournament. Your pathetic, piece of $hit, JOKE of a program is also lousy in the NIT. The NIT went to 16 teams in 1969. Despite this, your pathetic, piece of $hit program still has a pathetic record. You would think that if you had these so called "good" teams that your record would be better. In 11 NIT appearances, you have a record of 10-11. Way to go imbecile.

As far as last year goes, you overachieved by the standards of your pathetic, piece of $hit program, but by anyone's you were completely lucky. Here are the RPI's of the #4 seeds in last year's tournament.

07 Southern Illinois
16 Maryland
25 Texas
55 Virginia

You got a miracle draw against a bad Virginia team, AND you were getting beaten like a drum when Reynolds sprained his ankle. At the time Virginia was up 11 points and Reynolds had 22 points. Having said that; by your pathetic standards, you did overachieve by beating the #55 team in the RPI that was 1 seed higher than you. By anyone else's you were extremely lucky. In any event, it was just as well that you won because it set up the biggest choke in NCAA history.

Urineman, you are the king of the imbeciles because you try harder and go the extra mile to be more stupid than any of the other UTLofton imbeciles.

Stammers, your endless drivel reminds me of one of those toys from several years ago....you'd pull a string, and the toy would talk. Only problem was, it said the same thing over and over again. For the last 4 or 5 pages, you have pretty much been repeating yourself.....like that stupid toy. The other good Volunteer fans can keep going back and forth with you if they want to, but personally, I'm thru pulling your string, because I've already heard and read everything you have to offer. But as KTown said, remember...........WE OWN YOU, LITTLE BROTHER!!!!

Iluvtheorange Wrote:Stammers, your endless drivel reminds me of one of those toys from several years ago....you'd pull a string, and the toy would talk. Only problem was, it said the same thing over and over again. For the last 4 or 5 pages, you have pretty much been repeating yourself.....like that stupid toy. The other good Volunteer fans can keep going back and forth with you if they want to, but personally, I'm thru pulling your string, because I've already heard and read everything you have to offer. But as KTown said, remember...........WE OWN YOU, LITTLE BROTHER!!!!

Thru Pulling my string? Good one imbecile. Every time you or one of your band of imbeciles comes around I get throw in more facts about how pathetic your loser program is. When it comes to how pathetic your piece of $hit program is, there are endless facts to go around.

Btw, this is the 3rd time that each of you have threatened to stop coming around...yet you always come back to an opponent's message board. I can easily get you to come back here any time I want for more punishment. That should give you a better perspective on who is pulling the strings imbecile.

Try and make yourself useful and answer this simple question. Would you flip the 11-7 head to head record for an additional 5 Sweet 16's, 5 Elite 8's and 2 Final Fours? It's a simple yes or no answer imbecile.

See if you can handle that imbecile. Yes or no?

The String Puller's "Exit Speech" (3 Weeks Ago)

Boy payback is sure gonna be a ***** for vol fans this year. No 5 games in 8 days or whatever this year boys. No opening minute flops either. Cinderella turns back into a pumpkin in the FEF. Oh wait the vawls are already pumpkin colored.