Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
Author Message
jh Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,497
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 80
I Root For:
Location:

Donators
Post: #1
Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.
06-05-2008 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #2
RE: Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
jh Wrote:
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.

Makes me proud to be an American.03-puke
06-05-2008 08:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 34,304
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 320
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #3
RE: Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
jh Wrote:
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.

Makes me proud to be an American.03-puke

If the whole thing wasn't so pathetic, it would be funny. The developer and government should be forced to pay big money to the landowners whose land they stole, just for being stupid.
06-06-2008 08:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #4
RE: Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
NIU007 Wrote:
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
jh Wrote:
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.

Makes me proud to be an American.03-puke

If the whole thing wasn't so pathetic, it would be funny. The developer and government should be forced to pay big money to the landowners whose land they stole, just for being stupid.

Oh yeah...What do you think the odds of getting the very gang of thugs who stole the private property from these people to own up to actually harming them?.....Just how much more of this type of BS are Americans going to bend over and take?....and without even a kiss:bean:
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2008 10:15 PM by Fo Shizzle.)
06-06-2008 10:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 34,304
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 320
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #5
RE: Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
NIU007 Wrote:
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
jh Wrote:
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.

Makes me proud to be an American.03-puke

If the whole thing wasn't so pathetic, it would be funny. The developer and government should be forced to pay big money to the landowners whose land they stole, just for being stupid.

Oh yeah...What do you think the odds of getting the very gang of thugs who stole the private property from these people to own up to actually harming them?.....Just how much more of this type of BS are Americans going to bend over and take?....and without even a kiss:bean:

Although the government was stupid, some of the thugs are business owners - the very people whom you seem to think are able to run everything on their own just fine. They had a hand in this too.
06-07-2008 08:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fo Shizzle Offline
Pragmatic Classical Liberal
*

Posts: 42,023
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 1206
I Root For: ECU PIRATES
Location: North Carolina

Balance of Power Contest
Post: #6
RE: Kelo v. New London, Three Years Later
NIU007 Wrote:
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
NIU007 Wrote:
Fo Shizzle Wrote:
jh Wrote:
Quote:http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2..._08_g.html
... will highlight the fact that, like so many other projects that use eminent domain and rely on massive public subsidies, the Fort Trumbull project has so far been a major debacle. Close to three years after the Court’s decision, no new construction has taken place in the area, and the developer, desperate to obtain financing, has even applied to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive taxpayer-backed loans to build luxury rental housing. So far, more than $78 million in taxpayer funds have been spent on the project with nothing to show for it but brown, empty fields.

It's sad that the ruling which destroyed the federal right of private property was made to benefit an apparently worthless plan. Three years, $78 million, numerous families displaced, and nothing to show for it.

Makes me proud to be an American.03-puke

If the whole thing wasn't so pathetic, it would be funny. The developer and government should be forced to pay big money to the landowners whose land they stole, just for being stupid.

Oh yeah...What do you think the odds of getting the very gang of thugs who stole the private property from these people to own up to actually harming them?.....Just how much more of this type of BS are Americans going to bend over and take?....and without even a kiss:bean:

Although the government was stupid, some of the thugs are business owners - the very people whom you seem to think are able to run everything on their own just fine. They had a hand in this too.

Oh..no doubt..There will always be unethical businessmen..but... This type of thing can only happen in a statist paradigm. In a free market..with no government and only "private" property...Force could not be used to steal someones property. The property owner would have to be negotiated with in order to purchase his property. If he chose not to sell...well.. too bad. The guns of government are to blame for allowing unvirtuous businessmen to steal.
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2008 08:51 AM by Fo Shizzle.)
06-07-2008 08:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.