http://www.carbontax.org/myths/

#1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

(12-24-2009 02:05 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  #1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

Lets just keep emitting more and more and hope Jesus will save us.

Carbontax.org is hardly an unbiased site to get information about the Cap and Trade.

(12-25-2009 02:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-24-2009 02:05 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  #1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

Lets just keep emitting more and more and hope Jesus will save us.

I guess he did since global warming isn't a problem now.

(12-25-2009 08:54 AM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(12-25-2009 02:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-24-2009 02:05 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  #1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

Lets just keep emitting more and more and hope Jesus will save us.

I guess he did since global warming isn't a problem now.

The only problem is the ignorance by many on the right about the subject.

(12-26-2009 02:15 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-25-2009 08:54 AM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(12-25-2009 02:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-24-2009 02:05 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  #1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

Lets just keep emitting more and more and hope Jesus will save us.

I guess he did since global warming isn't a problem now.

The only problem is the ignorance by many on the right about the subject.

It takes a big man to admit he is ignorant on this subject ROBERT, now if you could get the rest of the so called scientists that faked their results to admit they just don't know we'd be halfway home.

(12-26-2009 07:37 AM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(12-26-2009 02:15 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-25-2009 08:54 AM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(12-25-2009 02:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-24-2009 02:05 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  #1 would work if they followed thru with it. Who exactly is really proposing to cut taxes? You saw what happened when gas taxes fell w/ diminished use...gov't pushed to raise rates to re-fill their coffers.

#4 is BS. It will hurt. Period.

#5, see #1. And remember this, the advocates saying to cut other taxes. Let's see if they remember that in a few years.

#6 is BS, sort of. We've already seen US good priced out of the marketplace. Manufacturing exists...where it's automated. See this post http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/manu...ls-to.html
When these people say "This argument assumes a static economy, sans adaptation and innovation" (which is funny coming from people who base their whole estimates on a static economy) what they mean is "People will lose jobs." See #1.

#7. I think is true.

#8. Who cares? Just another red herring.

Lets just keep emitting more and more and hope Jesus will save us.

I guess he did since global warming isn't a problem now.

The only problem is the ignorance by many on the right about the subject.

It takes a big man to admit he is ignorant on this subject ROBERT, now if you could get the rest of the so called scientists that faked their results to admit they just don't know we'd be halfway home.

I am not ignorant on the subject. You and the righties are the ones who don't believe in science and are ignorant on the subject. Of course, being from WV and coal country, you were brainwashed into believing global warming/climate change it isn't a problem.

Quote:The contents of this message is hidden because RobertN is on your ignore list.

Thanks for adding that Robert! Your insights and contributions are so valuable.