Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UTSA TELLING THE SLC PEACE!
Author Message
UTSARULES! Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 38
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: -11
I Root For: UTSA
Location:
Post: #1
UTSA TELLING THE SLC PEACE!
GO RUNNERSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!
Switching gears from a tentative plan to join the Southland Conference in football, UTSA has charted a new course for its fledgling program.

University of Texas at San Antonio athletic director Lynn Hickey said the school, which is slated to begin play in 2011, would attempt to reach the NCAA’s top flight as an independent by its fifth season in 2015.

Should they do so, the Roadrunners would become one of just four independent football teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A). They would remain there indefinitely until an opportunity to move their entire athletic program into an FBS conference presents itself.

“We have worked really hard looking at all our options,” Hickey said. “As a start-up program in a major city, with the aspirations we have, the facility we have, the head coach we have, the best thing we can do is move as quickly as we can to FBS status. And until we’re in a conference that has FBS football, we need to stay independent.”

Once populated by powers like Miami and Penn State, the cast of FBS independents has dwindled to three — Army, Navy and Notre Dame. The model for much of UTSA’s strategy, South Florida, played as a major-level independent for two seasons before joining Conference USA in 2003.

The school left for the Big East in 2005, eventually climbing as high as No. 2 in some national polls.

UTSA officials have said that earning a similar invitation will be akin to pursuing an NFL franchise. Until then, the school is prepared to survive without affiliation indefinitely.

“There are no promises,” Hickey said. “We won’t have control over a conference wanting to make changes. But we certainly have control over building all the pieces, the best we can, to be prepared and ready.”

The success of UTSA’s plan could hinge on the school’s relationship with the Southland, of which UTSA already is a member in 16 other Division I sports.

Southland commissioner Tom Burnett said members might balk at allowing UTSA to reap the benefits of Southland affiliation, particularly lucrative NCAA tournament berths, as it pursues membership in an FBS conference.

The 12-team Southland, which UTSA joined in 1991, plays football in the Football Championship Subdivision (formerly Division I-AA), one level below the FBS.

“An administrator at another school told me, ‘If our football isn’t good enough for them, then why in the world would their basketball, baseball and track be important to us?’” Burnett said.

Opposition within the Southland doesn’t stem from UTSA’s ambitions, Northwestern State athletic director Greg Burke stressed, but concern for the league’s future.

“We all have a lot of respect for Lynn and her staff,” he said. “It’s a judicious move for their school and their city. It probably should have happened a long time ago. But we have a conference to protect. Speaking about the people who work under my roof, the reaction to this hasn’t been very good.”

Aiming higher

Hickey said in September that plans to join the Southland in 2013 were “pretty much set.” Deeper exploration of the school’s options and a lukewarm response locally predicated a different approach.

“I don’t know if we got a lot of feedback, but people we talked to were a little disappointed,” she said. “They wanted us to go into a little higher level.”

Hickey has tried to address any concerns among her peers through individual conversations with Burnett and the Southland’s 11 other athletic directors.

UTSA’s biggest selling point for bypassing Southland football is to avoid the potential disruption of temporary membership.

“As the process went on, it became clear that we didn’t want to be constantly looking over our shoulder, looking for a way out,” coach Larry Coker said. “We have a lot of respect for them, so we tried to take them into account.”

Stephen F. Austin athletic director Robert Hill isn’t convinced, pointing to the fact that an FBS conference invitation would trigger the exodus of UTSA’s entire athletic program.

“It’s going to leave a void, one way or another,” he said.

What steps the Southland might take remain to be seen. UTSA’s plan likely will be a hot topic at the annual meeting of Southland school presidents in Galveston on June 4.

Asked if the conference could give UTSA an ultimatum to join fully or leave, Burke said: “I don’t think that’s out of the realm of possibility. I think we all hope it doesn’t get to that level.”

But until formal discussions take place, Burnett said: “It’s all conjecture.”

“Six of our former members are playing FBS football right now,” he added, “and we didn’t stop any of them. If that’s what they want to do, they’re probably going to do it. We’re going to be professional. We just haven’t had time to get together and react.”

With the course to FBS status already being charted, Hickey said she doesn’t know what UTSA would do if its membership in the Southland is made to hinge on football.

“There are so many factors, it would be unrealistic to say at this time,” she said. “Our program would be in a difficult situation and we’d have to look closely at the ramifications for everyone involved.”

Beyond any serious resistance from the Southland, Hickey and other UTSA officials are confident the school can meet the five NCAA requirements for FBS membership.

The Roadrunners already offers the requisite number of sports (16) and overall athletic scholarships (200). They’ve raised more than $2 million in donations, well on target to fund the football scholarship pool of 85. The combination of a major metro population and the Alamodome’s capacity provides an ample base to reach the rolling attendance standard of 15,000 per home game.

The biggest concern had been scheduling. But UTSA associate athletic director Ross Cobb said the response among potential FBS opponents has been “extremely favorable.”

“I’d say 95 percent have said they’d definitely be interested in a home-and-home,” he said. “This is a great city, with a great facility, and a lot of these schools recruit in Texas. It just makes sense to most of the people we talk to.”

Though no contracts have been signed, Cobb said, the school is in “serious” discussions with up to 20 FBS teams.

“I was a little apprehensive, just because there are so few teams that (play independently),” Cobb said. “But I think being in this city, with the recruiting hotbed that Texas is, if anybody has a chance to pull this off it’s us.”
01-31-2010 01:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


chargeradio Offline
Vamos Morados
*

Posts: 7,509
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 128
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
Post: #2
RE: UTSA TELLING THE SLC PEACE!
No reason for the Southland to rock the boat yet, as nine of their schools will be playing FCS football this fall (UTSA is not one of those), and kicking them out complicates scheduling by putting the conference to eleven schools Let UTSA shop around and line themselves up a new conference.

Once UTSA finds a new home (WAC, Sun Belt, etc.), the Southland can pick its new 12th school:

Arkansas-Little Rock (will be Sun Belt's only non-football member in 2013)
Central Oklahoma (currently in Division II, plays football)
Houston Baptist (currently in Great West, no football)
Oral Roberts (currently in Summit, no football)
Tarleton State (currently in Division II, plays football)
Texas-Pan American (currently in Great West, no football)

Personally, I would add UALR. Adding UALR gives you the cleanest split for divisions (all the Texas schools in the West, all the Arkansas and Louisiana schools in the East), doesn't add to the footprint, and more importantly, won't have any ambitions of going anywhere for a long time. Once Texas State and/or Lamar leave for FBS, the Southland can look at the other schools mentioned above.

Even if Texas State, Lamar, and UTSA all leave, that still leaves the Southland with seven schools for football and doesn't compromise the automatic bid to the FCS playoffs.

I should note that according to RealTimeRPI, Oral Roberts would be ranked third in the Southland Conference right now.
(This post was last modified: 01-31-2010 09:01 AM by chargeradio.)
01-31-2010 08:58 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.