(09-12-2010 03:14 PM)mattsarz Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 11:41 AM)buckaineer Wrote:  The Big East is in an evaluation period for the next BCS inclusion and it isn't looking so hot right now.

No it isn't.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=5126859

Quote:BCS Future Automatic Qualification Standards

Under the terms of the agreements with the bowls and television rightsholder, the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC will have annual automatic qualification for their champions for the 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 seasons.

Results from the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 regular seasons will be evaluated to determine whether a seventh conference earns automatic qualification for the 2012-13 and 2013-14 bowl games.

The non-AQs are being evaluated for a 7th slot in the final two seasons of the BCS agreement that started this year. That is the only evalutation being done.

Yes, it is

"If the BCS continues under the same or a similar format, conferences will be evaluated on their performances during the 2010 to 2013 regular seasons to determine which conferences without bowl contracts will have automatic qualification for the bowls that will conclude the 2014-2017 regular seasons."

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4819597

Last time I checked the Big East is the only conference without a BCS bowl tie in

I missed that part, thanks.

(09-12-2010 03:21 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:14 PM)mattsarz Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 11:41 AM)buckaineer Wrote:  The Big East is in an evaluation period for the next BCS inclusion and it isn't looking so hot right now.

No it isn't.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=5126859

Quote:BCS Future Automatic Qualification Standards

Under the terms of the agreements with the bowls and television rightsholder, the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC will have annual automatic qualification for their champions for the 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 seasons.

Results from the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 regular seasons will be evaluated to determine whether a seventh conference earns automatic qualification for the 2012-13 and 2013-14 bowl games.

The non-AQs are being evaluated for a 7th slot in the final two seasons of the BCS agreement that started this year. That is the only evalutation being done.

Yes, it is

"If the BCS continues under the same or a similar format, conferences will be evaluated on their performances during the 2010 to 2013 regular seasons to determine which conferences without bowl contracts will have automatic qualification for the bowls that will conclude the 2014-2017 regular seasons."

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4819597

Last time I checked the Big East is the only conference without a BCS bowl tie in

Remember that there are three different components the BCS analyses. There was a link to SEC guy that had done an analysis of the three categories for the 2008 and 09 year and the Big east was in good shape being ahead of ACC in all three and actually being ahead of more than two other conferences in most.

(09-12-2010 11:35 AM)MichaelSavage Wrote:  Both the ACC & Big East are dreck this year. But it's not like either were going to produce a title contender.

stick dreck yiddisha boy.,,,,,,

(09-12-2010 03:57 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:21 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:14 PM)mattsarz Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 11:41 AM)buckaineer Wrote:  The Big East is in an evaluation period for the next BCS inclusion and it isn't looking so hot right now.

No it isn't.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=5126859

Quote:BCS Future Automatic Qualification Standards

Under the terms of the agreements with the bowls and television rightsholder, the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC will have annual automatic qualification for their champions for the 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 seasons.

Results from the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 regular seasons will be evaluated to determine whether a seventh conference earns automatic qualification for the 2012-13 and 2013-14 bowl games.

The non-AQs are being evaluated for a 7th slot in the final two seasons of the BCS agreement that started this year. That is the only evalutation being done.

Yes, it is

"If the BCS continues under the same or a similar format, conferences will be evaluated on their performances during the 2010 to 2013 regular seasons to determine which conferences without bowl contracts will have automatic qualification for the bowls that will conclude the 2014-2017 regular seasons."

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4819597

Last time I checked the Big East is the only conference without a BCS bowl tie in

Remember that there are three different components the BCS analyses. There was a link to SEC guy that had done an analysis of the three categories for the 2008 and 09 year and the Big east was in good shape being ahead of ACC in all three and actually being ahead of more than two other conferences in most.

You are correct that there are three different components but the new evaluation starts this year and The computations will be made according to the conference's membership on Dec. 4, 2011. 2008 and 2009 don't count.

(09-12-2010 04:49 PM)Stookey57 Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 11:35 AM)MichaelSavage Wrote:  Both the ACC & Big East are dreck this year. But it's not like either were going to produce a title contender.

stick dreck yiddisha boy.,,,,,,

Not even the homers can justify such awful performances. But nobody thinks highly of the Big East anyway so it isn't like a big prestige hit.

(09-12-2010 08:22 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:57 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:21 PM)buckaineer Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 03:14 PM)mattsarz Wrote:  

(09-12-2010 11:41 AM)buckaineer Wrote:  The Big East is in an evaluation period for the next BCS inclusion and it isn't looking so hot right now.

No it isn't.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=5126859

Quote:BCS Future Automatic Qualification Standards

Under the terms of the agreements with the bowls and television rightsholder, the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC will have annual automatic qualification for their champions for the 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 seasons.

Results from the 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 regular seasons will be evaluated to determine whether a seventh conference earns automatic qualification for the 2012-13 and 2013-14 bowl games.

The non-AQs are being evaluated for a 7th slot in the final two seasons of the BCS agreement that started this year. That is the only evalutation being done.

Yes, it is

"If the BCS continues under the same or a similar format, conferences will be evaluated on their performances during the 2010 to 2013 regular seasons to determine which conferences without bowl contracts will have automatic qualification for the bowls that will conclude the 2014-2017 regular seasons."

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4819597

Last time I checked the Big East is the only conference without a BCS bowl tie in

Remember that there are three different components the BCS analyses. There was a link to SEC guy that had done an analysis of the three categories for the 2008 and 09 year and the Big east was in good shape being ahead of ACC in all three and actually being ahead of more than two other conferences in most.

You are correct that there are three different components but the new evaluation starts this year and The computations will be made according to the conference's membership on Dec. 4, 2011. 2008 and 2009 don't count.

They might not count but it gives us a good idea on how our league will perform. The Big East this year has a lot of young talent and coaching staffs, while it may not have a national contender, it will be very balanced and that will help in that component.

Never even heard of the word:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dreck

I have not been impressed with anybody in the BE so far.....

(09-13-2010 05:59 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  I have not been impressed with anybody in the BE so far.....

There's no reason to be. Yet some will complain about the lack of media recognition and respect...as if it's deserved.