chicago bearcat
1st String
Posts: 1,215
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 36
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
|
RE: Palin on Paul Revere
(06-06-2011 09:46 PM)Bearhawkeye Wrote: (06-06-2011 09:41 PM)chicago bearcat Wrote: (06-06-2011 09:36 PM)Overrated Wrote: That quote doesn't make him extremely conservative though.
You're right. The quote itself does not I'm saying he's a conservative republican because he's known around DC at dinner parties and such for expounding on actual personal views which stay shrouded as a news anchor. He's absolutely a conservative, very much unlike his liberal father who like I said was not happy with son's decision to go to Fox. (Mike Wallace is not a fan of Roger Ailes)
You still don't understand the difference between facts and unsubstantiated innuendo I see.
It's not innuendo if you hear it from the horse's mouth itself.
|
|
06-06-2011 09:50 PM |
|
QSECOFR
Heisman
Posts: 9,015
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 226
I Root For: CCM
Location:
|
RE: Palin on Paul Revere
BTW, chicago, Paul Revere never said, "The British are coming!" He said, "The regulars are coming!" since the citizens who he reportedly warned considered themselves to be British who happened to reside in North American colonies.
Guess that puts you and Palin on the same level.
|
|
06-07-2011 07:00 AM |
|
Bearcat_Bounce
God Like Summoner
Posts: 6,467
Joined: Mar 2011
I Root For: Winners
Location: Under a Bridge
|
RE: Palin on Paul Revere
[quote='Bearhawkeye' pid='6565578' dateline='1307401115']
Cut away all the bs, and what is left?
[quote]
He who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms
[/quote]
[quote]
Revere revealed (to the British that night) "there would be five hundred Americans there in a short time, for I had alarmed the country all the way up," he wrote.
[/quote]
This just is incorrect. The only reason why Revere revealed to the British what he had done was because he had been captured and was interrogated at gunpoint. Only then did he reveal to them that "there would be five hundred Americans there in a short time, for I had alarmed the country all the way up."
I have no problem criticizing the (lame)stream media's attack of this "political" figure. However it appears you have done something similar. You just plucked the part that supported your point.
Why must people show affilation to a party anyways? Its like conservatives will always just come to the defense of anything a conservation leader/figure does. Ditto for the liberals. What ever happened to believing in your own set of ideals and not a parties? Think of it objectively, there essentially no difference between the two parties. Bush won the 2000 election running on an anti-war, globalization, and policing platform. Then in 2008 Obama runs on the same platform. Guess what? both of those jackarse's did the same damn thing. The way people come out in defense of their parties is plain ridiculous, what happened to doing what's best for America? All this bickering is just a distraction.
|
|
06-07-2011 01:48 PM |
|
chicago bearcat
1st String
Posts: 1,215
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 36
I Root For: Bearcats
Location:
|
RE: Palin on Paul Revere
(06-07-2011 07:00 AM)QSECOFR Wrote: BTW, chicago, Paul Revere never said, "The British are coming!" He said, "The regulars are coming!" since the citizens who he reportedly warned considered themselves to be British who happened to reside in North American colonies.
Guess that puts you and Palin on the same level.
I never said that Revere said the "british are coming" Im well aware he said the regulars are coming. However any one wants to spin it, Revere's job was to warn the colonists that British troops were coming
|
|
06-07-2011 01:56 PM |
|