(12-02-2011 02:23 PM)UMTiger02 Wrote:  Chris Vernon reported yesterday the Carmouche was the reason for Will Coleman's black eye last year...

He is correct.

Why should we be surprised? This stuff happened routinely while Calipari was here. We just so happened to have a near NBA team, who ran by there own rules, and did things how they wanted. It's part of the allure of Cal.

(12-02-2011 02:33 PM)BinghamptonNed Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:16 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  I know that by me posting this information that I am mostly just starting trouble. I heard about this a couple of days ago and was reluctant to share it because of that realization. I will not reveal my source because it would potentially cause trouble with serious effects.

even if true a smart fan would never post this ---


just to clarify --what days practice did the punch occur?

Who said anything about a punch?

Who said anything about a punch?

(12-02-2011 02:33 PM)BinghamptonNed Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:16 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  I know that by me posting this information that I am mostly just starting trouble. I heard about this a couple of days ago and was reluctant to share it because of that realization. I will not reveal my source because it would potentially cause trouble with serious effects.

even if true a smart fan would never post this ---


just to clarify --what days practice did the punch occur?

A smart fanatic?

(12-02-2011 02:41 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:33 PM)BinghamptonNed Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:16 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  I know that by me posting this information that I am mostly just starting trouble. I heard about this a couple of days ago and was reluctant to share it because of that realization. I will not reveal my source because it would potentially cause trouble with serious effects.

even if true a smart fan would never post this ---


just to clarify --what days practice did the punch occur?

The same practice that Carmouche got "physical" with Pastner.

Are you putting "physical" in quotes because it's a euphemism and are you just saying it cause Carmouche is from New Orleans?

(12-02-2011 02:44 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:33 PM)BinghamptonNed Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:16 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  I know that by me posting this information that I am mostly just starting trouble. I heard about this a couple of days ago and was reluctant to share it because of that realization. I will not reveal my source because it would potentially cause trouble with serious effects.

even if true a smart fan would never post this ---


just to clarify --what days practice did the punch occur?

A smart fanatic?

The word 'fan' can be the short form for fanatic. It is also said to originate from the word 'fancy'. As in, I fancy the Tigers.

Not every fan has to be a fanatic.

HAHA... I am putting it in quotes because the source said physical; there was no elaboration. It was followed up with the claim that Carmouche's attitude problem was the reason behind Coleman's black eye. The word punch was NEVER mentioned.

The whole "I know something you don't know" crap is extremely lame. Goes hand in hand with the whole "First!" psuedo-phenomenon. Anybody that goes through the trouble to run to an online bulletin board and create a fake account to report what they heard from important anonymous sources is in serious need of attention.

If you have something to say, say it and stand behind it. If you can't stand behind it, then it probably doesn't need to be said.

(12-02-2011 02:52 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  HAHA... I am putting it in quotes because the source said physical; there was no elaboration. It was followed up with the claim that Carmouche's attitude problem was the reason behind Coleman's black eye. The word punch was NEVER mentioned.

booty-pinch?

I believe Vernon said that "was a fight between the two" but it never came out to the public, because the basketball program keeps things extremely close to the vest.

(12-02-2011 02:33 PM)SmokeyOneKenobi Wrote:  get that SCTF...........sick em!

Lol. Before you know it some of the crazies will be looking up folks ip addresses...oh wait.

(12-02-2011 02:53 PM)Wilco36 Wrote:  The whole "I know something you don't know" crap is extremely lame. Goes hand in hand with the whole "First!" psuedo-phenomenon. Anybody that goes through the trouble to run to an online bulletin board and create a fake account to report what they heard from important anonymous sources is in serious need of attention.

If you have something to say, say it and stand behind it. If you can't stand behind it, then it probably doesn't need to be said.

That is mostly fair. However I disagree with the "serious need of attention" part. I exhibit the very opposite by posting it (perhaps cowardly) under an alternative (not "fake") username.

I do however realize that the very impulse that lead to me posting this is probably a weakness of mine. the very weakness that most of us on this board posses; the very weakness that is seducing you into the action of reloading your page to read my response to your post.

(12-02-2011 01:51 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  But of course this is probably something minor.

I seem to recall being rebuked for saying that this was more of a major deal then on the surface. You must be in that club too.

[/quote]

A smart fanatic?
[/quote]

The word 'fan' can be the short form for fanatic. It is also said to originate from the word 'fancy'. As in, I fancy the Tigers.

Not every fan has to be a fanatic.

[/quote]

Hmm... I never knew that. lol, I believe, however, my condition is more of a fanaticism than a preference.

(12-02-2011 03:07 PM)ruraljuror Wrote:  

(12-02-2011 02:53 PM)Wilco36 Wrote:  The whole "I know something you don't know" crap is extremely lame. Goes hand in hand with the whole "First!" psuedo-phenomenon. Anybody that goes through the trouble to run to an online bulletin board and create a fake account to report what they heard from important anonymous sources is in serious need of attention.

If you have something to say, say it and stand behind it. If you can't stand behind it, then it probably doesn't need to be said.

the very weakness that is seducing you into the action of reloading your page to read my response to your post.

I have been seduced by a few websites, just not this one.

anyone really think Mouch would have a prayer against Coleman?

(12-02-2011 03:17 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  anyone really think Mouch would have a prayer against Coleman?

That's what I was thinking...........

(12-02-2011 03:17 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  anyone really think Mouch would have a prayer against Coleman?

I know I said earlier that Pastner could take Mouche, but that was somewhat tongue in cheek. I do think Mouche could take Coleman though. While big and strong, I dont think Coleman possessed the attitude I see more in Mouche.

(12-02-2011 03:17 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  anyone really think Mouch would have a prayer against Coleman?

anyone really think he hit a door?

the story is true about mouche and coleman.