Sorry, Bird fan, you're obviously dizzy again from all that spinning of the story.
CUSA's basketball MINIMUM is six games per year. The actual number will obviously depend on how many good teams we have. The old minimum was 19; the actual number of games in 2004/05 is 42 including OOC. If we have 3 tourney teams, plus 2-3 more NIT, we will be on ESPN for basketball a lot more than 6 times. If it's 15 actual games, for example, that gives the most successful teams a shot at 4-6 games on ESPN each.
The football exposure will be exactly as before. A minimum of 10 games under both the old and new deals, with the actual count typically 50% higher than that. What's the difference between Wed. and Thurs.? This conference as it stands has had a lot more Tues., Wed., and Fri. games than Thurs. games. It's still uncontested, national exposure, and the ratings are the same regardless of the night involved. One game on Friday night every 2-3 years in a particular town isn't going to send the high school crowd galloping off the cliff. Everybody's getting used to it. In New Orleans, more than half the high school games are played on Thurs. and Sat. But, nice try on that as well.
The desire for continued ESPN, boys and girls, is to maintain exposure on the cable system in the U.S. as is. CSTV is there simply for revenue in the short term. Their exposure to actual TV viewers is low. Unless they syndicate heavily, their exposure will grow slowly, just like ESPN did.
CSTV is financially secure for the simple reason that they have a sufficient subscriber revenue stream. If they get just $1.50 per month per subscriber, with 5 million subscribers, that's $90 million per year. They just signed their biggest financial obligations ever, for MWC and then CUSA major sports coverage. The two combined are $18-19 million per year. They'll cover that cost if they just pick up 1 million more subscribers nationwide. It's not their finances, they can easily pay. It's their exposure.
So, boys and girls, CUSA gets the same football ESPN exposure, the opportunity to earn decent basketball ESPN exposure through their performance, slightly higher revenue because of CSTV's subscriber base, and whatever exposure CSTV generates through local, regional and national syndication. Given these facts (not opinions), I can't wait to read why this is still, nevertheless, a loser deal.
Now, Bird fans can go back to proclaiming their own greatness and superiority, and Memphis fans who hump the Big East symbol daily can go back to sucking Louisville and other Big East weenie.
|