(05-06-2012 10:41 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  

(05-06-2012 08:39 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(05-06-2012 08:11 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  

(05-06-2012 04:53 PM)Maize Wrote:  

(05-06-2012 04:51 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Big East football credibility will depend on what happens once the league starts o play. Boise has had a good run but many think it's based on a weak schedule, they fall in Big East nd everyone I'll say see they couldn't even handle a Big East schedule, so Boise is not a shoo in to build BE football credibility.

I guess he doesn't realize if everyone currently in the league and coming in is here is 2013 that Boise State would not be the favorites that year. It will likely be Louisville/Cincinnati then followed by South Florida and Boise State.

Would that be the same Cincinatti team that lost to A Fresno team that Boise hammered?

LOL hilarious that you count a game that s meaningless. I can point a loss by any team. I will say that UC has finished highly ranked and been to two BCS Bowls. Fresno neither. So yes UC has made more of a football impact than Fresno..
Anyways it's pointless discussion because SDSU and Boise have moved on. You better hope Fresno is that 14 th addition to BE or you will be enjoying those matchps with Utah State, SJSU and Wyoming.
By the way that year UC finished 4-8. Let's look at the other years

Sure go ahead. How about the year Cinci barely beat us at home before going undefeated and then Boise hammered us. Or how about the year we beat Rutgers and then got hammered. The list goes on.

Look I am not here to disparage Big East football but before you disparage teams in the MW shouldn't you at least beat them convincingly on the field?

I think that's EXACTLY why you're here.

Follow the money. Enough said.

It's from Bleacher Report. Your argument is automatically invalid.

PIPE BOMB! (Really, who on this board actually takes Bleacher Report seriously? I certainly don't. I don't think most people on here do either.)

And yet another piece of trash thread.

Lets stop being a source and use some sound judgement. Stop adding posts to this type of trash. Thank you in advance for not posting.

"bleacher report"
Stopped right there.

(05-06-2012 05:45 PM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Here is the part that many are not thinking. If the MWC thinks that by destroying WAC they could force Boise and SDSU back, the Big East could respond by going to 16 football members and raiding the MWC for three more schools and leave the MWC with 7 members and pretty much not better than MAC or Sun Belt. This could turn ugly for the MWC in the long run.

I think the MWC took from the WAC to fill their conference and survive. I don't think any of this raiding is intended to destroy anyone, it's just business.