Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
Author Message
catdaddy_2402 Offline
I'm not an ACC cheerleader

Posts: 4,657
Joined: Apr 2004
I Root For: Clemson and ECU
Location: midlands of SC
Post: #21
RE: New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
(12-14-2012 12:20 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Neil, if you're right and I'm wrong then I'll be happy because that would mean more money for the ACC.
04-rock

Well, if you are wrong you could always follow the example that the "Orange Bowl is going to make the same money as the Sugar" crowd did and say you were really right, but some kind of circumstance forced it to change.
12-14-2012 12:23 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #22
RE: New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
(12-14-2012 12:23 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 12:20 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Neil, if you're right and I'm wrong then I'll be happy because that would mean more money for the ACC.
04-rock

Well, if you are wrong you could always follow the example that the "Orange Bowl is going to make the same money as the Sugar" crowd did and say you were really right, but some kind of circumstance forced it to change.

I wasn't one of those, but I did think the worse it would get is $60 million with the ACC receiving $40 million and the opponent $20 million.

Cheers,
Neil
12-14-2012 12:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #23
RE: New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
(12-14-2012 12:10 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:52 AM)omniorange Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:43 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:29 AM)omniorange Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 10:08 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Um, you may want to re-read the article above. It does NOT state that the 4 power conference will get $91 million annually... what id DOES state is:


Since the ACC will NOT average $91M, it's either wrong or means something different from what you are thinking.

I went into this in detail on my blog - see Revenue Comparison - power 5.

Cliff Notes version:
Each of the 5 power conferences gets:
* $51.75 M/yr right off the top
* $40M/yr or $27.5M/yr for 2/3 years from Contract Bowls
* for 1/3 years the amount is yet uknown, but I'd estimate no more than $12.5M/yr from Access Bowls during semi-final years, with the exception of the SEC & B1G; during the 12 years, the SEC/B1G will get $40M for 8 of those years, $27.5 for 3 years, and no more than $12.5M for 1 year

The reason I say "no more than $12.5M/yr for Access Bowls" is simply because if you take all of the playoff money that's unaccounted for - namely $125M/yr - and divide that by the number of teams - playoff games (4), access bowls (4) or the championship (2), for a total of 10 - you get $12.5M, with NOTHING left for overhead. I'll leave it up to you to decide (1) how much overhead, and (2) whether championship game teams will get a double share (e.g. $12.5M for both the semi and the championship) or if not, how much extra.

I read your blog and I don't think it is supported by what has been reported.

And yes, the ACC will basically average $90 million annually over the 12-year period based upon what I am talking about.

They will get the $51 million the other 4 power conferences get - $612 million

Then they will 6 years of $27.5 million when BiG, SEC are OB opponents - another $165 million.

Then the 4 years the OB is a semi-final game they will get $55 million - another $220 million.

And assuming ND qualifies as the OB opponent twice the ACC will likely get $40 million per year - another $80 million there.

The total for the 12 year period is 1.077 trillion which amounts to $89.75 million annually.

The Pac 12 and Big 12 will get 1.092 trillion which amounts to $91 million annually for each conference.

The BiG and the SEC will get the same, except for when they get to be the OB opponent three times each in the 8 years the OB isn't a semi-final game, then in those years only the conference receives $118 million instead of $91 million.

Cheers,
Neil

I think counting on ND to be in the OB 2x in the 8 chances could be a bit foolish. I mean, if they have a year like this, they'd be in the playoff(even with 1 loss). If they have more than 2 losses, won't be ahead of SEC team for sure, and most years Big Ten team. It's a very slim window that ND has to get into the Orange. It's no lock that ND is OB bound 2x in the 8 chances. At all.

While I can't deny that as a possibility, I would think statistically it will be far more likely ND is 10-2 more often than 12-0 or even 11-1. And a 10-2 ND is likely to be higher rated than the third/fourth place SEC or second/third place BiG team which is probably why both wanted a minimum clause to be part of the OB contract.

Cheers,
Neil

I said more than 2 losses, but even 2 losses, ND wouldn't be a lock... This year, 10-2 ND would not be ahead of 10-2 LSU or Texas A&M....

A LOT with ND will be timing quite frankly.

You have no way of knowing that. Let's say ND beats Alabama for the NC this year. In 2014 still think a 10-2 ND would definitely be behind a 10-2 LSU or A&M?

Cheers,
Neil
12-14-2012 12:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
omniorange Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,144
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 251
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:

Donators
Post: #24
RE: New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
(12-14-2012 12:20 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  Neil, if you're right and I'm wrong then I'll be happy because that would mean more money for the ACC.
04-rock

Well, I'm hoping I'm right too. But it's deduction based upon info that is being reported. Who knows if the reported info is even correct?

Cheers,
Neil
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2012 12:33 PM by omniorange.)
12-14-2012 12:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 46,413
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #25
RE: New Playoff Revenue Distribution Released
(12-14-2012 12:31 PM)omniorange Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 12:10 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:52 AM)omniorange Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:43 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2012 11:29 AM)omniorange Wrote:  I read your blog and I don't think it is supported by what has been reported.

And yes, the ACC will basically average $90 million annually over the 12-year period based upon what I am talking about.

They will get the $51 million the other 4 power conferences get - $612 million

Then they will 6 years of $27.5 million when BiG, SEC are OB opponents - another $165 million.

Then the 4 years the OB is a semi-final game they will get $55 million - another $220 million.

And assuming ND qualifies as the OB opponent twice the ACC will likely get $40 million per year - another $80 million there.

The total for the 12 year period is 1.077 trillion which amounts to $89.75 million annually.

The Pac 12 and Big 12 will get 1.092 trillion which amounts to $91 million annually for each conference.

The BiG and the SEC will get the same, except for when they get to be the OB opponent three times each in the 8 years the OB isn't a semi-final game, then in those years only the conference receives $118 million instead of $91 million.

Cheers,
Neil

I think counting on ND to be in the OB 2x in the 8 chances could be a bit foolish. I mean, if they have a year like this, they'd be in the playoff(even with 1 loss). If they have more than 2 losses, won't be ahead of SEC team for sure, and most years Big Ten team. It's a very slim window that ND has to get into the Orange. It's no lock that ND is OB bound 2x in the 8 chances. At all.

While I can't deny that as a possibility, I would think statistically it will be far more likely ND is 10-2 more often than 12-0 or even 11-1. And a 10-2 ND is likely to be higher rated than the third/fourth place SEC or second/third place BiG team which is probably why both wanted a minimum clause to be part of the OB contract.

Cheers,
Neil

I said more than 2 losses, but even 2 losses, ND wouldn't be a lock... This year, 10-2 ND would not be ahead of 10-2 LSU or Texas A&M....

A LOT with ND will be timing quite frankly.

You have no way of knowing that. Let's say ND beats Alabama for the NC this year. In 2014 still think a 10-2 ND would definitely be behind a 10-2 LSU or A&M?

Cheers,
Neil

We'll see what happens in the title game, as you're right things can change, but at least now, LSU(or maybe especially A&M coming off the win vs Alabama) would be ahead of ND.
12-14-2012 12:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.