(12-20-2012 01:17 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 12:44 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:42 AM)Rebel Wrote:  Your choice. Leave mine with me.

You personally should not have a right to own a gun. People with mental problems should NOT be allowed to own a gun. Period.

And yet, I seem to be able to survive in this economy without any help and with a good income while you're renting a f'n apartment with a sh*t job, supposedly with a degree from NIU. Who do you think it is that has the mental issue here, Robert? We're both about the same age, but it would appear you can't get sh*t right.

You.

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

(12-20-2012 01:22 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:17 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 12:44 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:42 AM)Rebel Wrote:  Your choice. Leave mine with me.

You personally should not have a right to own a gun. People with mental problems should NOT be allowed to own a gun. Period.

And yet, I seem to be able to survive in this economy without any help and with a good income while you're renting a f'n apartment with a sh*t job, supposedly with a degree from NIU. Who do you think it is that has the mental issue here, Robert? We're both about the same age, but it would appear you can't get sh*t right.

You.

Your diagnosis awaits.

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

(12-20-2012 01:25 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:22 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:17 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 12:44 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:42 AM)Rebel Wrote:  Your choice. Leave mine with me.

You personally should not have a right to own a gun. People with mental problems should NOT be allowed to own a gun. Period.

And yet, I seem to be able to survive in this economy without any help and with a good income while you're renting a f'n apartment with a sh*t job, supposedly with a degree from NIU. Who do you think it is that has the mental issue here, Robert? We're both about the same age, but it would appear you can't get sh*t right.

You.

Your diagnosis awaits.

I am not projecting anything. Read your damn posts. You are CLEARLY mentally ill. PTSD for starters.

(12-20-2012 01:31 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:25 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:22 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:17 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 12:44 PM)RobertN Wrote:  You personally should not have a right to own a gun. People with mental problems should NOT be allowed to own a gun. Period.

And yet, I seem to be able to survive in this economy without any help and with a good income while you're renting a f'n apartment with a sh*t job, supposedly with a degree from NIU. Who do you think it is that has the mental issue here, Robert? We're both about the same age, but it would appear you can't get sh*t right.

You.

Your diagnosis awaits.

I am not projecting anything. Read your damn posts. You are CLEARLY mentally ill. PTSD for starters.

Grease traps, Robert. Get to it. Chop Chop.

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

A response by a true idiot.

(12-20-2012 01:36 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

A response by a true idiot.

So you have spoken to those that wrote it?

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

They wrote it down.

Quote:1.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,2. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1. The goal.

2. The means to fulfill that goal.


You idiots libs are proving, once again, why you are meant to be ruled, not governed.

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

They wrote it down.

They wrote words.

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

Quote:1.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,2. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1. The goal.

2. The means to fulfill that goal.


You idiots libs are proving, once again, why you are meant to be ruled, not governed.

Your opinion.

(12-20-2012 01:41 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

They wrote it down.

They wrote words.

Wow, thanks Yogi Berra!

(12-20-2012 01:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

Quote:1.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,2. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1. The goal.

2. The means to fulfill that goal.


You idiots libs are proving, once again, why you are meant to be ruled, not governed.

Your opinion.

It's called basic English and sentence structure, light brite.

(12-20-2012 01:43 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

Quote:1.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,2. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1. The goal.

2. The means to fulfill that goal.


You idiots libs are proving, once again, why you are meant to be ruled, not governed.

Your opinion.

It's called basic English and sentence structure, light brite.

THe state of Mississippi and Augusta Community College have failed you.

The second amendment is the only one that specifically spells out intent.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

(12-20-2012 01:45 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:43 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

Quote:1.A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,2. the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

1. The goal.

2. The means to fulfill that goal.


You idiots libs are proving, once again, why you are meant to be ruled, not governed.

Your opinion.

It's called basic English and sentence structure, light brite.

THe state of Mississippi and Augusta Community College have failed you.

Thanks for proving your ignorance. Here, let me make it simple for a person with such a retarded intellect:

"Food being necessary for the sustainment of my life, I will stop by a fast food restaurant tonight to buy dinner. Hopefully it won't be the one where RobertN works."

Why am I stopping by a fast food restaurant? Because food is needed to sustain my life. Why should the right to bear arms never be infringed? Because a well-regulated militia is needed to secure a free state. A well-regulated militia is comprised of private citizens.

Damn, I assumed even you could understand such an elementary concept. I guess I need to lower that bar a little further for you.

(12-20-2012 01:46 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  The second amendment is the only one that specifically spells out intent.

BY READING THIS POST YOU RECOGNIZE THAT IMATY IS THE LAST GREAT CRUSADER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE SO HELP YOU GOD.

Your opinion.

(12-20-2012 01:41 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 10:32 AM)SgtGoldenEagle Wrote:  If they have to have 50 round in a military level weapon to go hunting, they aren't fit for hunting or they are hunting humans.

You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

They wrote it down.

They wrote words.

Words have meanings.

(12-20-2012 01:49 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:41 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:29 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 01:24 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  You fail to understand the intent of the 2nd amendment.

The intent is based on opinion. THe only people who know the intent are those who wrote it and they are long dead. Unless you can find a Delorean and go back in time, your definition of intent is opinion.

They wrote it down.

They wrote words.

Words have meanings.

THey may have meaning. But it is opinion as to what that meaning is.