More from our bestest buddy:

Quote:Thanks for the response. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I can pretty much tell you that your posting your response of my email to you, as well as your individual comments to it, on your web site does not protect you ( personally or professionally ) under DMCA or its Safe Harbor provisions. It could possibly ... maybe legally protect people / customers on your site, but not you. None of the DMCA or its Safe Harbor provisions protects you or anyone that is professionally affiliated with your website the from comments / statements that you personally post on your web site. I already have everything I need, some of which you personally provided, ( Thank you ) to make a legal case against you. Thanks for including your website 'handle' in your email response. That made things much easier.

GTS, ever get tired of the idiots out there?

(05-26-2011 09:54 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  More from our bestest buddy:

Quote:Thanks for the response. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.

express no sorrow as the longer the time between your posts, the greater the appreciation.

Quote:I can pretty much tell you that your posting your response of my email to you, as well as your individual comments to it, on your web site does not protect you ( personally or professionally ) under DMCA or its Safe Harbor provisions.

say what?

Quote:It could possibly ... maybe legally protect people / customers on your site, but not you.

how about i impossibly, illegally if necessary (unlikely), protect the "people / customers" on here from the likes of you?

Quote: None of the DMCA or its Safe Harbor provisions protects you or anyone that is professionally affiliated with your website the from comments / statements that you personally post on your web site.

huh?

do you have some sort of written word impediment? just fyi, the over-use of adverbs may help you feel better, but it doesn't accomplish the hoped for objective of making you appear more intellectual.

Quote:I already have everything I need,

this is a bad joke, right?

Quote:some of which you personally provided, ( Thank you ) to make a legal case against you.

god knows you need all the help you can get, even if you misinterpret the purpose of the information. and what's with you stomping your juvenile foot on "legal?" again, as opposed to what? "illegal?"

if you were half as "legal" smart as you pretend, you'd still be 4 times the idiot you try not to appear to be. nice job with the basics on libel. you can cap a whole batch of words and still the aroma of "stupid" is left wafting in the aftermath of each of your posts.

by the way you illegal beagle (not to be confused with legal eagle), check in with your phantom litigator on the equitable principle known as "laches." and get up to speed on the necessary element of actual damages for an action in defamation UNLESS (i can cap too) it's an action for defamation per se, and that involves:

Quote:libel per se n. broadcast or written publication of a false statement about another which accuses him/her of a crime, immoral acts, inability to perform his/her profession, having a loathsome disease (like syphilis), or dishonesty in business. Such claims are considered so obviously harmful that malice need not be proved to obtain a judgment for "general damages," and not just specific losses.

call that friendly advice and i won't send you a bill.

Quote:Thanks for including your website 'handle' in your email response. That made things much easier.

we're here to simplify your life. now, simplify ours.

I miss running a board.

Good grief.

(05-27-2011 07:40 PM)SpokaneBearcat Wrote:  I miss running a board.

Good grief.

Spokane!

Come back Spokane!

We miss you!

All the ladies miss you!

Some of the guys miss you too, especially the guys who don't miss the ladies!

Please come back and run this dam n board!

I have been waiting patiently for g to respond to the latest drivel from this idiot. I have to say it was worth the wait.

sub, I agree 100%. alway love it when g gives 'em a kind lecture that shows the poster to be a few million brain cells short of half a brain.