(02-28-2013 12:42 AM)TheEastisPurple Wrote:  

Just wanted to quote this because the message is awesome.

(02-28-2013 01:10 AM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:42 AM)TheEastisPurple Wrote:  

Just wanted to quote this because the message is awesome.

Just thought I should point out that only about 3.4 percent of the American population identifies themselves as homosexual.

(02-28-2013 02:13 AM)Mgt2j Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 01:10 AM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:42 AM)TheEastisPurple Wrote:  

Just wanted to quote this because the message is awesome.

Just thought I should point out that only about 3.4 percent of the American population identifies themselves as homosexual.

And how many more are too afraid to identify themselves as such? Which is the whole point of this thread. People who identify themselves as homosexual are vilified by our current culture.

(02-27-2013 09:50 PM)EpicNiner Wrote:  I've seen several articles lately questioning his sexuality and even saying that some teams, in the states that allow it, will ask him before deciding whether to draft him.

That's a federal statute.....not allowed, at least legally, anywhere in the U.S.

(02-27-2013 10:15 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 09:52 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Does it matter?

It sure would matter to me. I wouldnt want to shower and share a dressing room with a guy that is gay.

I'm curious - why?

(02-27-2013 10:28 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:18 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:15 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 09:52 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Does it matter?

It sure would matter to me. I wouldnt want to shower and share a dressing room with a guy that is gay.

That sounds like a personal problem.

Maybe its a personal problem for you. Its not a personal problem for me, its my perference. Whether you like it or not. It would be my right to NOT have to shower or share a dressing room with any guy that is gay. If anything, its the gay guy that would have a "personal problem" if he didnt like my view.

It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

This thread is one giant facepalm.

(02-28-2013 12:32 AM)GreenBison Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:04 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:53 PM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:42 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  I would rather teach and raise my kids the right way........By telling them "intelligently" that one man lusting over another man is a mental illness. Plain and simple.

Wow

You can "Wow" it all you want. Thats my right and that's what I'll do. I've been in the medical field for 20 years. Its my belief is that the American Psyciatric Assocation (DSM-II) had it right the first time before ultimately changing there stance.

...always good to ignore science....it's always been wrong throughout it's evolution...science hasn't learned a thing...the earth is only 6.5K years old and the earth was flooded...and chromosomal genetic factors in homosexuals is a myth...they are all crazy people

Science?

Put 100 lesbian couples on an island
Put 100 gay couples on an island
Put 100 straight couples on an island

Revisit all three islands in 150 years... there's your science.

Assuming isolation (I think that is your point) they would all be dead due to lack of resources. They would've killed each other off long before 150 years expired. Now if you want to claim three individual continents are islands...dayum, we have what is known as today's world because they would move from place to place and eventually interact and reproduce.

(02-28-2013 02:55 AM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 02:13 AM)Mgt2j Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 01:10 AM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:42 AM)TheEastisPurple Wrote:  

Just wanted to quote this because the message is awesome.

Just thought I should point out that only about 3.4 percent of the American population identifies themselves as homosexual.

And how many more are too afraid to identify themselves as such? Which is the whole point of this thread. People who identify themselves as homosexual are vilified by our current culture.

Very good!

...is 21st century Salem witch trial or Spanish inquisition...hell, one could go a recent as the American civil rights movement....history is a funny thing..

(02-28-2013 08:09 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  This thread is one giant facepalm.

To you it is....I have actually been very impressed by most of the responses....30 years ago there wouldn't have been one acceptable response...now step down and go have a visit with Father Pat.

(02-27-2013 11:12 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:07 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  I think he's gay personally. How are you the best and most widely known football player on the Notre Dame football team and not slaying ladies left and right. Granted he's not the QB, but a first round draft pick shouldn't have any trouble getting girls in his bed. No reason he should have ever been trolling for girls on the Internet.

I'd say he's gay also. Probably used that story and the fake girlfriend bs as a way to justify not hanging out or partying with hot girls while his teamates did. That would be my guess.

There are no hot girls in South Bend.

(02-28-2013 07:46 AM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:28 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:18 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:15 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 09:52 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Does it matter?

It sure would matter to me. I wouldnt want to shower and share a dressing room with a guy that is gay.

That sounds like a personal problem.

Maybe its a personal problem for you. Its not a personal problem for me, its my perference. Whether you like it or not. It would be my right to NOT have to shower or share a dressing room with any guy that is gay. If anything, its the gay guy that would have a "personal problem" if he didnt like my view.

It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

Oh really? Well if its strictly about "working condition".... as you state it... then why aren't men actively and openly allowed to share a dressing room or shower at any time with Women now?...or vise versa?

(02-28-2013 08:31 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 08:09 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  This thread is one giant facepalm.

To you it is....I have actually been very impressed by most of the responses....30 years ago there wouldn't have been one acceptable response...now step down and go have a visit with Father Pat.

This thread is so gay...

(02-28-2013 08:50 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 07:46 AM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:28 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:18 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:15 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  It sure would matter to me. I wouldnt want to shower and share a dressing room with a guy that is gay.

That sounds like a personal problem.

Maybe its a personal problem for you. Its not a personal problem for me, its my perference. Whether you like it or not. It would be my right to NOT have to shower or share a dressing room with any guy that is gay. If anything, its the gay guy that would have a "personal problem" if he didnt like my view.

It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

Oh really?. Well if its strictly about "working condition".... as you state it... then why aren't men actively and openly allowed to share a dressing room or shower at any time with Women now?...or vise versa?

you can't dig fast enough....do you know the difference between physiological difference vs. the different types of genetic transfer? Study up. In sum, it is called evolution.

(02-28-2013 09:00 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 08:50 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 07:46 AM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:28 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:18 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  That sounds like a personal problem.

Maybe its a personal problem for you. Its not a personal problem for me, its my perference. Whether you like it or not. It would be my right to NOT have to shower or share a dressing room with any guy that is gay. If anything, its the gay guy that would have a "personal problem" if he didnt like my view.

It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

Oh really?. Well if its strictly about "working condition".... as you state it... then why aren't men actively and openly allowed to share a dressing room or shower at any time with Women now?...or vise versa?

you can't dig fast enough....do you know the difference between physiological difference vs. the different types of genetic transfer? Study up. In sum, it is called evolution.

Hey wait a minute there stinkyfinger.....dont change directions. How about answering the question I proposed instead of changing direction?

Just thought I should point out that only about 3.4 percent of the American population identifies themselves as homosexual.
[/quote]

And how many more are too afraid to identify themselves as such? Which is the whole point of this thread. People who identify themselves as homosexual are vilified by our current culture.
[/quote]

If you look at the percentages of people who identify themselves as homosexual in other countries where it is an acceptable practice the percentage is still around 3-5 percent.

(02-28-2013 12:32 AM)GreenBison Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:04 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:53 PM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:42 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  I would rather teach and raise my kids the right way........By telling them "intelligently" that one man lusting over another man is a mental illness. Plain and simple.

Wow

You can "Wow" it all you want. Thats my right and that's what I'll do. I've been in the medical field for 20 years. Its my belief is that the American Psyciatric Assocation (DSM-II) had it right the first time before ultimately changing there stance.

...always good to ignore science....it's always been wrong throughout it's evolution...science hasn't learned a thing...the earth is only 6.5K years old and the earth was flooded...and chromosomal genetic factors in homosexuals is a myth...they are all crazy people

Science?

Put 100 lesbian couples on an island
Put 100 gay couples on an island
Put 100 straight couples on an island

Revisit all three islands in 150 years... there's your science.

You would have 300 dead bodies since you are dumping them on an island that has been deemed uninhabitable by tens of thousands of years of human history.

The book Collapse would be a good start on that.

(02-28-2013 09:11 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 09:00 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 08:50 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 07:46 AM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 10:28 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  Maybe its a personal problem for you. Its not a personal problem for me, its my perference. Whether you like it or not. It would be my right to NOT have to shower or share a dressing room with any guy that is gay. If anything, its the gay guy that would have a "personal problem" if he didnt like my view.

It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

Oh really?. Well if its strictly about "working condition".... as you state it... then why aren't men actively and openly allowed to share a dressing room or shower at any time with Women now?...or vise versa?

you can't dig fast enough....do you know the difference between physiological difference vs. the different types of genetic transfer? Study up. In sum, it is called evolution.

Hey wait a minute there stinkyfinger.....dont change directions. How about answering the question I proposed instead of changing direction?

I did.

(02-28-2013 09:14 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 09:11 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 09:00 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 08:50 AM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 07:46 AM)WinOrLoseEAGLE Wrote:  It would be your choice, but since that's a working condition (locker rooms in athletic camps), it's not your right at all. In fact, it's the right of the gay person to have the exact same facilities, not the other way around.

Oh really?. Well if its strictly about "working condition".... as you state it... then why aren't men actively and openly allowed to share a dressing room or shower at any time with Women now?...or vise versa?

you can't dig fast enough....do you know the difference between physiological difference vs. the different types of genetic transfer? Study up. In sum, it is called evolution.

Hey wait a minute there stinkyfinger.....dont change directions. How about answering the question I proposed instead of changing direction?

I did.

No...you didn't. That's not an answer. You put spin on it instead.

(02-28-2013 08:41 AM)egrizzard Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:12 PM)MUHERD76 Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:07 PM)RonBurgundy Wrote:  I think he's gay personally. How are you the best and most widely known football player on the Notre Dame football team and not slaying ladies left and right. Granted he's not the QB, but a first round draft pick shouldn't have any trouble getting girls in his bed. No reason he should have ever been trolling for girls on the Internet.

I'd say he's gay also. Probably used that story and the fake girlfriend bs as a way to justify not hanging out or partying with hot girls while his teamates did. That would be my guess.

There are no hot girls in South Bend.

Leave my daughter out of this.