[url] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...views.html[/url]

Makes a little sense, if you didn't have the ability to provide for yourself in the past, you obviously lived off what others provided.

I guess this explains Toby.

Was this another study weak men wasted money on?

I don't tend to describe "strong / weak" men in terms of pushups but there is probably something to this.

Understand how the uber far left mind will process this.

Traditionally masculine characteristics are bad. So we are working hard to medicate them out of little boys at a young age while we socialize the next generation of men as women. Therefore weak men are "advanced"..

If only we can find a cure for C19H28O2

(05-17-2013 07:39 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  I don't tend to describe "strong / weak" men in terms of pushups but there is probably something to this.

I would agree. Physical strength while important is not the final indicator. A better indicator of strong vs weak could be understood in this essay:

http://www.killology.com/sheep_dog.htm

I encourage everyone to read it in its entirety, but here are some snips.

Quote:But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? Then you are a sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero’s path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

Quote:Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose which one they want to be, and I’m proud to say that more and more Americans are choosing to become sheepdogs.

This is what I try to impart on anti-gun nuts and the left; I'm entirely committed to the idea that no one is going to threaten my, or my familys, existence.

(05-16-2013 09:23 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  [url] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...views.html[/url]

Makes a little sense, if you didn't have the ability to provide for yourself in the past, you obviously lived off what others provided.

I'm guessing this mentality doesn't just apply to men.

(05-17-2013 08:12 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(05-16-2013 09:23 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  [url] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...views.html[/url]

Makes a little sense, if you didn't have the ability to provide for yourself in the past, you obviously lived off what others provided.

I'm guessing this mentality doesn't just apply to men.

Didn't read the link did you? It says there was no correlation among women.

Following history lesson bears repeating:

Quote:Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.

The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:

1. Liberals; and
2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girliemen.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.

Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the *******.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.

Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history: It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it. A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.

(05-17-2013 07:48 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(05-17-2013 07:39 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  I don't tend to describe "strong / weak" men in terms of pushups but there is probably something to this.

I would agree. Physical strength while important is not the final indicator. A better indicator of strong vs weak could be understood in this essay:

http://www.killology.com/sheep_dog.htm

I encourage everyone to read it in its entirety, but here are some snips.

Quote:But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? Then you are a sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero’s path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

Quote:Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose which one they want to be, and I’m proud to say that more and more Americans are choosing to become sheepdogs.

This is what I try to impart on anti-gun nuts and the left; I'm entirely committed to the idea that no one is going to threaten my, or my familys, existence.

Seems about right Ill give it a read. Strength is the capacity and willingness to dominate a situation but the restraint and compassion to know when to do it and when not to do it.

(05-17-2013 08:23 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(05-17-2013 08:12 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(05-16-2013 09:23 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  [url] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/articl...views.html[/url]

Makes a little sense, if you didn't have the ability to provide for yourself in the past, you obviously lived off what others provided.

I'm guessing this mentality doesn't just apply to men.

Didn't read the link did you? It says there was no correlation among women.

Find that hard to believe. I'm going with "weak" to mean weak minded or nonmotivated. Both sexes can be that way. Those folks tend to want handouts so it's hard for me to believe this would only apply to males.

Women tend to be influenced by whether they are married or not. More conservative if married, liberal if single.

It's pretty simple. Garden variety liberals are in general, by definition, miserable with their lot in life and thus want to change the environment around them because they either think it will make them happier or will make everyone else just as miserable as them. Garden variety conservatives are, by definition, happy with the way things are.

This is not the case across the board. It changes once you put the money and higher level influences into it. Financially successful liberals, for example, simply see graft, fraud, and corruption opportunities in big government and really only pretend to care about social issues (think George Soros). Same goes with many "conservative" politicians that only pretend to be conservative for the elections, but are also only interested in the graft (think Bob McDonnell). Thus, there is very little difference in how the two parties in the USA govern other than on the very inconsequential in the larger scheme kitchen table issues. The only difference is who gets rich off the taxpayer expense.

(05-17-2013 07:48 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(05-17-2013 07:39 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  I don't tend to describe "strong / weak" men in terms of pushups but there is probably something to this.

I would agree. Physical strength while important is not the final indicator. A better indicator of strong vs weak could be understood in this essay:

http://www.killology.com/sheep_dog.htm

I encourage everyone to read it in its entirety, but here are some snips.

Quote:But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? Then you are a sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero’s path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

Quote:Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose which one they want to be, and I’m proud to say that more and more Americans are choosing to become sheepdogs.

This is what I try to impart on anti-gun nuts and the left; I'm entirely committed to the idea that no one is going to threaten my, or my familys, existence.

Good read. My guess is that most people think they're sheepdogs while very few actually are. If you're just a normal citizen would you really know what you are until the circumstance arises? I carry my Glock 19 Gen 4 daily but who knows how I would react if I ever had to use it.

(05-17-2013 08:44 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Women tend to be influenced by whether they are married or not. More conservative if married, liberal if single.

You have to wonder weather that correlation is an effect or causal..

(05-17-2013 09:02 AM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  Good read. My guess is that most people think they're sheepdogs while very few actually are. If you're just a normal citizen would you really know what you are until the circumstance arises? I carry my Glock 19 Gen 4 daily but who knows how I would react if I ever had to use it.

Unholster. Chamber round. Fire.

Wasn't that easy? It comes natural in real life, don't worry.

Quote:Political views are designed by natural selection to function in the conditions recurrent over human evolutionary history.

Praise God!!