Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
Author Message
ChrisLords Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,685
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 339
I Root For: Virginia Tech
Location: Earth
Post: #21
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-26-2013 03:13 PM)Otacon Wrote:  
(05-26-2013 11:15 AM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  Seems like VT-West Virginia would be a perfect neutral site game to play in Washington DC every year. It would help keep the ACC flag planted there with Maryland gone.

I think that would help out both teams with recruiting in that area....Then we wouldn't have to bother scheduling Maryland. As a WVU fan, I'd be okay with playing VT every few years in DC.....Maybe even even at Baltimore's stadium?

I don't think Maryland will be disappearing from WVU's schedule any time soon. WVU needs as many close OOC opponents as possible and depending on how the UMD/ACC settlement goes; UMD may be in the same situation.
05-26-2013 09:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PhiladelphiaVT Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 134
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 4
I Root For: Virginia Tech
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
I'd like to see a renewal of the VT/WVU rivalry, but only at a neutral site (M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore perhaps)--and on a trial basis at first. If the fans can keep their behavior under control, I say play it every year. The schools are relatively close to one another and each has a passionate fan base. Rivalries like this make college FB great, and the VT/WVU Black Diamond "Border War" was one of the best. It would be a sellout every year.
05-26-2013 11:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
7fielder Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,387
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 53
I Root For: Pittsburgh
Location: Seven Fields, PA
Post: #23
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....
05-28-2013 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

I would say that's over scheduling. Pitt isn't strong enough for that type of schedule because you also have to throw in ND every 3 years.
05-28-2013 03:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MKPitt Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 844
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 51
I Root For: Pitt
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

Yep, unfortunately it won't happen. I really wish all the northeast teams could be independents in football again. It's just so much more interesting than getting tied down with a conference schedule every year. I understand it in other sports but I really don't like it for football. I really envy Notre Dame.

For example, in the national championship season in 1976 they played: Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Temple, Duke, Louisville, Miami (Fl), Navy, Syracuse, Army, West Virginia, and Penn State.

Another example in '82 was:
North Carolina, Florida State, Illinois, West Virginia, Temple, Louisville, Syracuse, Notre Dame, Army, Rutgers, and Penn State.

So as an independent with an 11 game schedule Pitt played its big four rivals: Penn State, Notre Dame, West Virginia, and Syracuse every year (or at least close to it). Then they usually played between 3-4 games against the five other regional teams: Army, Navy, Rutgers, Temple, and Boston College. Finally, every year they had 3-4 games to rotate through with other P5 schools like Miami, Georgia Tech, Duke and Louisville in '76 and UNC, Florida State, Louisville, and Illinois in '82.

How amazing do those schedules sound? If Pitt had to be in a conference, the ACC would be my choice by far but it's just really disappointing what's happened.
(This post was last modified: 05-28-2013 03:08 PM by MKPitt.)
05-28-2013 03:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Otacon Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 872
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 54
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: West Virginia
Post: #26
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 03:07 PM)MKPitt Wrote:  
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

Yep, unfortunately it won't happen. I really wish all the northeast teams could be independents in football again. It's just so much more interesting than getting tied down with a conference schedule every year. I understand it in other sports but I really don't like it for football. I really envy Notre Dame.

For example, in the national championship season in 1976 they played: Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Temple, Duke, Louisville, Miami (Fl), Navy, Syracuse, Army, West Virginia, and Penn State.

Another example in '82 was:
North Carolina, Florida State, Illinois, West Virginia, Temple, Louisville, Syracuse, Notre Dame, Army, Rutgers, and Penn State.

So as an independent with an 11 game schedule Pitt played its big four rivals: Penn State, Notre Dame, West Virginia, and Syracuse every year (or at least close to it). Then they usually played between 3-4 games against the five other regional teams: Army, Navy, Rutgers, Temple, and Boston College. Finally, every year they had 3-4 games to rotate through with other P5 schools like Miami, Georgia Tech, Duke and Louisville in '76 and UNC, Florida State, Louisville, and Illinois in '82.

How amazing do those schedules sound? If Pitt had to be in a conference, the ACC would be my choice by far but it's just really disappointing what's happened.

Don't mean to sound like an ass, but would your schedule be much different then the ones from '76 and '82? You played all three in those years....
05-28-2013 04:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
7fielder Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,387
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 53
I Root For: Pittsburgh
Location: Seven Fields, PA
Post: #27
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 03:02 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

I would say that's over scheduling. Pitt isn't strong enough for that type of schedule because you also have to throw in ND every 3 years.

Eh... if we are gonna lose to teams like YSU then we might as well lose to national known names and rivals....
05-28-2013 06:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CardinalJim Offline
Welcome to The New Age
*

Posts: 16,587
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 3004
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Staffordsville, KY
Post: #28
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
Like most fan bases WVU has its bad apples as does Louisville or any other fan base. You have to be careful not to paint everyone with a broad brush because of the behavior of a few nimrods. I would welcome he opportunity to play them again, home or away.
CJ
05-28-2013 07:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 06:15 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-28-2013 03:02 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  
(05-25-2013 03:30 PM)Cardinals Wrote:  Here's a Gobbler Country piece quoting Oliver Luck as saying he'd like to have Pitt & Va Tech back on the Mountaineers' schedule.

What do Pittsburgh & Virginia Tech fans think? Do your fan bases want this? Is this more of a desperation move to get some games closer to home on WVU's part? They really don't need a tougher schedule now, but I do think they need a schedule that's more fan-friendly, and Blacksburg & Pittsburgh are a lot fan-friendlier than Lubbock and Fort Worth.

Source: West Virginia Wants to Play Virginia Tech Again

Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

I would say that's over scheduling. Pitt isn't strong enough for that type of schedule because you also have to throw in ND every 3 years.

Eh... if we are gonna lose to teams like YSU then we might as well lose to national known names and rivals....

Everyone has momentary lapses. Michigan lost to Appalachian St so it happens.

As a fan of the ACC, I'd rather the middle tier teams build competitive consistency before trying something like this.
05-28-2013 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,838
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1413
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #30
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-28-2013 03:07 PM)MKPitt Wrote:  
(05-28-2013 01:41 PM)7fielder Wrote:  Pitt should play both WVU and Penn State every year....

Yep, unfortunately it won't happen. I really wish all the northeast teams could be independents in football again. It's just so much more interesting than getting tied down with a conference schedule every year. I understand it in other sports but I really don't like it for football. I really envy Notre Dame.

For example, in the national championship season in 1976 they played: Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, Temple, Duke, Louisville, Miami (Fl), Navy, Syracuse, Army, West Virginia, and Penn State.

Another example in '82 was:
North Carolina, Florida State, Illinois, West Virginia, Temple, Louisville, Syracuse, Notre Dame, Army, Rutgers, and Penn State.

So as an independent with an 11 game schedule Pitt played its big four rivals: Penn State, Notre Dame, West Virginia, and Syracuse every year (or at least close to it). Then they usually played between 3-4 games against the five other regional teams: Army, Navy, Rutgers, Temple, and Boston College. Finally, every year they had 3-4 games to rotate through with other P5 schools like Miami, Georgia Tech, Duke and Louisville in '76 and UNC, Florida State, Louisville, and Illinois in '82.

How amazing do those schedules sound? If Pitt had to be in a conference, the ACC would be my choice by far but it's just really disappointing what's happened.

Funny that you chose those 2 years, because these are the ACC teams Pitt played in 76 + 82, with a * beside the ones on your 2013 schedule:
Duke *
Florida State *
Georgia Tech *
Louisville
Miami (Fl) *
North Carolina *
Syracuse *

Well, UL is not in the ACC in '13 so that's not really fair... but 6 of the teams you will play in 2013 are teams Pitt played in 76 & 82! You've basically made those games annual while Notre Dame won't be, and you've replaced Army, Rutgers and Temple with Virginia and Va Tech (there IS no replacement for Penn State, whom you will FINALLY begin playing again). If you add WVU, the schedule would be VERY similar, IMO.
05-29-2013 08:10 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,161
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 449
I Root For: Common Sense
Location: Nunnayadamnbusiness
Post: #31
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
No offense but subbing out ND, PSU and WVU for a bunch of schools like Duke, Virginia and the like is not remotely like the schedules listed above. Imagine North Carolina no longer getting to play Duke, NC State or Virginia but someone trying to tell them it's the same thing because they'll still get to play Boston College, Syracuse and Miami every year. They wouldn't see that as being the same thing either.
05-29-2013 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,161
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 449
I Root For: Common Sense
Location: Nunnayadamnbusiness
Post: #32
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
Don't get me wrong, we made the most of an eroding situation and I am thrilled to have landed where we did. However, Pitt has given up a LOT over the past several years now and no band aid is going to change that. The three games Pitt fans have always cared most about were Penn State, Notre Dame and West Virginia. It is very possible that none of those teams will appear on future schedules with any degree of regularity and that will definitely hurt interest in the program no matter how many trips North Carolina, Virginia Tech and even Florida State make to Heinz Field.
05-29-2013 09:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #33
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 09:13 AM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  Don't get me wrong, we made the most of an eroding situation and I am thrilled to have landed where we did. However, Pitt has given up a LOT over the past several years now and no band aid is going to change that. The three games Pitt fans have always cared most about were Penn State, Notre Dame and West Virginia. It is very possible that none of those teams will appear on future schedules with any degree of regularity and that will definitely hurt interest in the program no matter how many trips North Carolina, Virginia Tech and even Florida State make to Heinz Field.

Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.
05-29-2013 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,161
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 449
I Root For: Common Sense
Location: Nunnayadamnbusiness
Post: #34
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 11:17 AM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.

There is no such thing as a mini rivalry. That's like a pseudo rivalry, which is to say it's not a rivalry at all.

We certainly have a history with the Hurricanes but it's not much different than our shared history with schools like Boston College and Syracuse. Don't get me wrong, we've played all of those schools a bunch over the decades - including as independents, which people often forget - and we all have different memories of games against those teams from yesteryear but that is not the same as a true blood feud like we had for decades against Penn State and West Virginia.

I'm sure the fans of those other schools all feel the same way towards Pitt.

Penn State and West Virginia are different in that those fan bases absolutely resent our very existence - just as we do theirs.

Do you think it is somehow coincidental that almost all of the rumors of the ACC's demise came out of the Mountain State and the one school never mentioned as likely landing on its feet was Pitt? Nope, Pitt and its ACC brethren were going to pay dearly for snubbing the Mountaineers. That's par for the course with those guys. The only difference was that the rest of the country finally got a good look at how psychotic they are.

The same was true of Penn State and the whole Sandusky deal. They have always demonstrated cult-like behavior and screwed up priorities that make normal, well adjusted people uncomfortable. However the rest of the country never got a good look behind the curtain until the Sandusky scandal broke. At that point everyone saw how messed up they were as a collective group.

That type of unbridled hatred is practically unheard of anywhere else in the Northeast and Pitt has/had it with two different large, passionate (irrational) fan bases. That's impossible to replace.

Also, Pitt has a long shared history with Notre Dame that is different than the other non-rivals that I listed. Pittsburgh is a HEAVILY Catholic city and as such there are zillions of Domers are all over the place here. As such, those games always feel like rivalry games even if they're not. And when Pitt is good, those games absolutely are rivalry type atmospheres.

Now we're giving up that game too for games versus Duke and North Carolina?

I'm sorry but that is tough medicine to stomach and I say that without a hint of disrespect for Duke and Carolina (or anyone else in the ACC). As I said, it would be like telling a UNC fan, "Well, yeah you no longer get to play NC State and Duke every year but don't worry because now you will get to play Boston College and Syracuse more often."

I'm not sure that would go over so well in Chapel Hill.

Please don't misunderstand me on this. Given our choices, I'm glad things worked out as they did. Trust me when I tell you that I fully understand that the alternative was much, much worse - just ask UConn and Cincy fans. As such, I'm not running around bemoaning the falling sky, I'm simply acknowledging reality. Pitt came out a winner in the conference realignment lottery. However we did not come out unscathed - or anywhere close to unscathed. We are paying a fairly heavy price here and have been for some time now.

I am encouraged by the four game series Pitt and Penn State are slated to play. Those two schools should have never ceased playing and they only stopped because Paterno was powerful enough to act on his petty grudges.

However, he is now gone and - magically - suddenly there is again room on Penn State's schedule for Pitt.

What a surprise!

If Pitt can schedule an annual home-and-home with Penn State then all of this will have clearly been worth it. We still will have sacrificed annual games with our second and third biggest rivals in Notre Dame and West Virginia but we also would have gained an annual series with our top rival, Penn State and the relative security of the ACC.

All things considered that is a fairly reasonable trade.

That said, if we aren't playing Penn State every year (preferably on Thanksgiving Weekend), then we almost have to renew our series with West Virginia or risk becoming one of those schools that has no rivals and that is not appealing at all.

It's cool and fun to be the bane of another fan base's existence and we've had that with two large, passionate fan bases over the years - even though for much of the past three decades we have done very little to justify such respect/derision. I'd really hate to lose that special status and we can't afford to lose it with all of our aforementioned rivals all in the off chance that we may one day become Virginia Tech's second or third biggest game.

That will not suffice.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2013 01:42 PM by Dr. Isaly von Yinzer.)
05-29-2013 01:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hokie Mark Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,838
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1413
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #35
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 09:10 AM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  No offense but subbing out ND, PSU and WVU for a bunch of schools like Duke, Virginia and the like is not remotely like the schedules listed above. Imagine North Carolina no longer getting to play Duke, NC State or Virginia but someone trying to tell them it's the same thing because they'll still get to play Boston College, Syracuse and Miami every year. They wouldn't see that as being the same thing either.

No offense taken. I wasn't saying that UNC, et. al. were replacing PSU / ND / WVU - in fact, I stated that NO ONE can replace PSU (except PSU). ND dropping from annual to 1/3 hurts, but there have been periods in the past w/o any ND games, IIRC. As for WVU, I have proposed here as well as my accfootballrx blog that Pitt SHOULD begin scheduling WVU again.

So, if Pitt would take my advice, you'd always have:
* Penn State (OOC, probably 1st week)
* W Virginia (OOC, probably last week)
* Notre Dame every 3 years
* Tample and/or Navy (same as before)
plus annual games with
* Syracuse (same as before Big East)
* Va Tech (same as pre-2003 Big East)
* Ga Tech (same as before Big East)
* Miami (same as before Big East)
* Virginia (replaces Rutgers)
* UNC (replaces Louisville)
* Duke (replaces Army)
* 1 more ACC team (replaces random Illinois, Iowa, etc.)

How is that worse? Admittedly you must CHOOSE to schedule both PSU and WVU, along with Temple and/or Navy - but if Pitt does that (and there is no reason they should not, IMHO), the only "replacements" are UVA/UNC/Duke for Rutgers/Louisville/Army... oh, and you get to play U of L sometimes, too!

(will you miss playing Rutgers THAT much? if so, rotate them in OOC in years when either PSU or WVU come off the schedule. Army? rotate them with Temple and Navy. No reason this can't be the best situation EVER for Pitt football)
05-29-2013 01:42 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 01:35 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 11:17 AM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.

There is no such thing as a mini rivalry. That's like a pseudo rivalry, which is to say it's not a rivalry at all.

We certainly have a history with the Hurricanes but it's not much different than our shared history with schools like Boston College and Syracuse. Don't get me wrong, we've played all of those schools a bunch over the decades - including as independents, which people often forget - and we all have different memories of games against those teams from yesteryear but that is not the same as a true blood feud like we had for decades against Penn State and West Virginia.

I'm sure the fans of those other schools all feel the same way towards Pitt.

Penn State and West Virginia are different in that those fan bases absolutely resent our very existence - just as we do theirs.

Do you think it is somehow coincidental that almost all of the rumors of the ACC's demise came out of the Mountain State and the one school never mentioned as likely landing on its feet was Pitt? Nope, Pitt and its ACC brethren were going to pay dearly for snubbing the Mountaineers. That's par for the course with those guys. The only difference was that the rest of the country finally got a good look at how psychotic they are.

The same was true of Penn State and the whole Sandusky deal. They have always demonstrated cult-like behavior and screwed up priorities that make normal, well adjusted people uncomfortable. However the rest of the country never got a good look behind the curtain until the Sandusky scandal broke. At that point everyone saw how messed up they were as a collective group.

That type of unbridled hatred is practically unheard of anywhere else in the Northeast and Pitt has/had it with two different large, passionate (irrational) fan bases. That's impossible to replace.

Also, Pitt has a long shared history with Notre Dame that is different than the other non-rivals that I listed. Pittsburgh is a HEAVILY Catholic city and as such there are zillions of Domers are all over the place here. As such, those games always feel like rivalry games even if they're not. And when Pitt is good, those games absolutely are rivalry type atmospheres.

Now we're giving up that game too for games versus Duke and North Carolina?

I'm sorry but that is tough medicine to stomach and I say that without a hint of disrespect for Duke and Carolina (or anyone else in the ACC). As I said, it would be like telling a UNC fan, "Well, yeah you no longer get to play NC State and Duke every year but don't worry because now you will get to play Boston College and Syracuse more often."

I'm not sure that would go over so well in Chapel Hill.

Please don't misunderstand me on this. Given our choices, I'm glad things worked out as they did. Trust me when I tell you that I fully understand that the alternative was much, much worse - just ask UConn and Cincy fans. As such, I'm not running around bemoaning the falling sky, I'm simply acknowledging reality. Pitt came out a winner in the conference realignment lottery. However we did not come out unscathed - or anywhere close to unscathed. We are paying a fairly heavy price here and have been for some time now.

I am encouraged by the four game series Pitt and Penn State are slated to play. Those two schools should have never ceased playing and they only stopped because Paterno was powerful enough to act on his petty grudges.

However, he is now gone and - magically - suddenly there is again room on Penn State's schedule for Pitt.

What a surprise!

If Pitt can schedule an annual home-and-home with Penn State then all of this will have clearly been worth it. We still will have sacrificed annual games with our second and third biggest rivals in Notre Dame and West Virginia but we also would have gained an annual series with our top rival, Penn State and the relative security of the ACC.

All things considered that is a fairly reasonable trade.

That said, if we aren't playing Penn State every year (preferably on Thanksgiving Weekend), then we almost have to renew our series with West Virginia or risk becoming one of those schools that has no rivals and that is not appealing at all.

It's cool and fun to be the bane of another fan base's existence and we've had that with two large, passionate fan bases over the years - even though for much of the past three decades we have done very little to justify such respect/derision. I'd really hate to lose that special status and we can't afford to lose it with all of our aforementioned rivals all in the off chance that we may one day become Virginia Tech's second or third biggest game.

That will not suffice.

UNC already had to deal this issue with the removal of Clemson and Wake Forest from our yearly schedule. Now we see them once every 6 years with the rotating partners concept.

From a fan's perspective, I would love if all teams played their main rivals every year but unfortunately, it's not always feasible. Pitt needs to concentrate on being consistent first. If they over schedule now, they'll be sitting at home in December instead of going to a bowl game.
05-29-2013 03:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MKPitt Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 844
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 51
I Root For: Pitt
Location:
Post: #37
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 03:51 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 01:35 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 11:17 AM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.

There is no such thing as a mini rivalry. That's like a pseudo rivalry, which is to say it's not a rivalry at all.

We certainly have a history with the Hurricanes but it's not much different than our shared history with schools like Boston College and Syracuse. Don't get me wrong, we've played all of those schools a bunch over the decades - including as independents, which people often forget - and we all have different memories of games against those teams from yesteryear but that is not the same as a true blood feud like we had for decades against Penn State and West Virginia.

I'm sure the fans of those other schools all feel the same way towards Pitt.

Penn State and West Virginia are different in that those fan bases absolutely resent our very existence - just as we do theirs.

Do you think it is somehow coincidental that almost all of the rumors of the ACC's demise came out of the Mountain State and the one school never mentioned as likely landing on its feet was Pitt? Nope, Pitt and its ACC brethren were going to pay dearly for snubbing the Mountaineers. That's par for the course with those guys. The only difference was that the rest of the country finally got a good look at how psychotic they are.

The same was true of Penn State and the whole Sandusky deal. They have always demonstrated cult-like behavior and screwed up priorities that make normal, well adjusted people uncomfortable. However the rest of the country never got a good look behind the curtain until the Sandusky scandal broke. At that point everyone saw how messed up they were as a collective group.

That type of unbridled hatred is practically unheard of anywhere else in the Northeast and Pitt has/had it with two different large, passionate (irrational) fan bases. That's impossible to replace.

Also, Pitt has a long shared history with Notre Dame that is different than the other non-rivals that I listed. Pittsburgh is a HEAVILY Catholic city and as such there are zillions of Domers are all over the place here. As such, those games always feel like rivalry games even if they're not. And when Pitt is good, those games absolutely are rivalry type atmospheres.

Now we're giving up that game too for games versus Duke and North Carolina?

I'm sorry but that is tough medicine to stomach and I say that without a hint of disrespect for Duke and Carolina (or anyone else in the ACC). As I said, it would be like telling a UNC fan, "Well, yeah you no longer get to play NC State and Duke every year but don't worry because now you will get to play Boston College and Syracuse more often."

I'm not sure that would go over so well in Chapel Hill.

Please don't misunderstand me on this. Given our choices, I'm glad things worked out as they did. Trust me when I tell you that I fully understand that the alternative was much, much worse - just ask UConn and Cincy fans. As such, I'm not running around bemoaning the falling sky, I'm simply acknowledging reality. Pitt came out a winner in the conference realignment lottery. However we did not come out unscathed - or anywhere close to unscathed. We are paying a fairly heavy price here and have been for some time now.

I am encouraged by the four game series Pitt and Penn State are slated to play. Those two schools should have never ceased playing and they only stopped because Paterno was powerful enough to act on his petty grudges.

However, he is now gone and - magically - suddenly there is again room on Penn State's schedule for Pitt.

What a surprise!

If Pitt can schedule an annual home-and-home with Penn State then all of this will have clearly been worth it. We still will have sacrificed annual games with our second and third biggest rivals in Notre Dame and West Virginia but we also would have gained an annual series with our top rival, Penn State and the relative security of the ACC.

All things considered that is a fairly reasonable trade.

That said, if we aren't playing Penn State every year (preferably on Thanksgiving Weekend), then we almost have to renew our series with West Virginia or risk becoming one of those schools that has no rivals and that is not appealing at all.

It's cool and fun to be the bane of another fan base's existence and we've had that with two large, passionate fan bases over the years - even though for much of the past three decades we have done very little to justify such respect/derision. I'd really hate to lose that special status and we can't afford to lose it with all of our aforementioned rivals all in the off chance that we may one day become Virginia Tech's second or third biggest game.

That will not suffice.

UNC already had to deal this issue with the removal of Clemson and Wake Forest from our yearly schedule. Now we see them once every 6 years with the rotating partners concept.

From a fan's perspective, I would love if all teams played their main rivals every year but unfortunately, it's not always feasible. Pitt needs to concentrate on being consistent first. If they over schedule now, they'll be sitting at home in December instead of going to a bowl game.

I don't think you're getting it, Penn State and West Virginia are not Clemson and Wake Forest for Pitt, they are Duke and UVA/NC State. I'm pretty sure people in Chapel Hill would not be happy if they said you don't get to play Duke yearly in basketball or UVA in football anymore. There's nothing anyone can do about it but all Pitt fans are saying is that we are disappointed right now with the loss of our major rivals. People outside of Western PA do not understand how intense and heated these two rivalries are.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2013 06:11 PM by MKPitt.)
05-29-2013 06:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,161
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 449
I Root For: Common Sense
Location: Nunnayadamnbusiness
Post: #38
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
I absolutely agree that Pitt shouldn't over schedule. I just think that we should retain at least one permanent rival. That's not too much to ask, is it?

One.

The reality is that Pitt is an urban school that is located in the heavily pro-centric Northeast and which shares a market and indeed a stadium with arguably the NFL's most popular and successful franchise: the Steelers. That would be stiff competition for anyone to face.

In order to effectively deal with that, Pitt needs to schedule games that fans people's passions and Pitt needs to win those games. History has demonstrated that when Pitt plays against "name teams," and beats them with any degree of consistency, they draw exceptionally well.

Conversely, as we all saw after the defections of Miami, BC and Virginia Tech, when the Panthers are forced to play against lesser known teams, even if they win, nobody will come and watch them play.

Think about it for a second. Why would anyone care about a game between the Universities of Pittsburgh and Cincinnati when the next day they could see the professional versions between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Cincinnati Bengals?

That is a tough mindset to overcome and we struggle with it just like Boston College and Miami do and like Minnesota and Northwestern do in the Big Ten. I'm not familiar enough with Georgia Tech to comment on how well they do in that area. I do know that we are all waaaaaaay better off than the likes of Temple, SMU, Houston, Cincinnati, etc., who can't draw flies in their respective markets (though I am tempted to take Cincy out of that mix).

That is why the move to the ACC is so huge for Pitt. It's not that the ACC has amazing cache in Pittsburgh - it does not. Truthfully, from a quality perspective, the ACC is just a small bump up from what we were seeing in the Big East. However, if we would have gotten stuck in a league with the likes of Memphis, UCF, SMU, etc., that would have been a death knell for our program.

Nobody is Pittsburgh would have shown up for a Wednesday night game versus Memphis.

Nobody.

As for the analogy of UNC losing Clemson and Wake Forest, that is not nearly the same thing as Pitt losing PSU, WVU and ND. It would be like UNC losing NC State, Duke and Virginia...in men's basketball.

I'm not bemoaning missing out on games versus Rutgers or Temple or Cincinnati. Frankly, we don't give a schitt about playing any of those schools. The same goes for UConn and USF. All of those schools will be easily replaced by their ACC doppelgangers.
05-29-2013 06:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 06:08 PM)MKPitt Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 03:51 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 01:35 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 11:17 AM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.

There is no such thing as a mini rivalry. That's like a pseudo rivalry, which is to say it's not a rivalry at all.

We certainly have a history with the Hurricanes but it's not much different than our shared history with schools like Boston College and Syracuse. Don't get me wrong, we've played all of those schools a bunch over the decades - including as independents, which people often forget - and we all have different memories of games against those teams from yesteryear but that is not the same as a true blood feud like we had for decades against Penn State and West Virginia.

I'm sure the fans of those other schools all feel the same way towards Pitt.

Penn State and West Virginia are different in that those fan bases absolutely resent our very existence - just as we do theirs.

Do you think it is somehow coincidental that almost all of the rumors of the ACC's demise came out of the Mountain State and the one school never mentioned as likely landing on its feet was Pitt? Nope, Pitt and its ACC brethren were going to pay dearly for snubbing the Mountaineers. That's par for the course with those guys. The only difference was that the rest of the country finally got a good look at how psychotic they are.

The same was true of Penn State and the whole Sandusky deal. They have always demonstrated cult-like behavior and screwed up priorities that make normal, well adjusted people uncomfortable. However the rest of the country never got a good look behind the curtain until the Sandusky scandal broke. At that point everyone saw how messed up they were as a collective group.

That type of unbridled hatred is practically unheard of anywhere else in the Northeast and Pitt has/had it with two different large, passionate (irrational) fan bases. That's impossible to replace.

Also, Pitt has a long shared history with Notre Dame that is different than the other non-rivals that I listed. Pittsburgh is a HEAVILY Catholic city and as such there are zillions of Domers are all over the place here. As such, those games always feel like rivalry games even if they're not. And when Pitt is good, those games absolutely are rivalry type atmospheres.

Now we're giving up that game too for games versus Duke and North Carolina?

I'm sorry but that is tough medicine to stomach and I say that without a hint of disrespect for Duke and Carolina (or anyone else in the ACC). As I said, it would be like telling a UNC fan, "Well, yeah you no longer get to play NC State and Duke every year but don't worry because now you will get to play Boston College and Syracuse more often."

I'm not sure that would go over so well in Chapel Hill.

Please don't misunderstand me on this. Given our choices, I'm glad things worked out as they did. Trust me when I tell you that I fully understand that the alternative was much, much worse - just ask UConn and Cincy fans. As such, I'm not running around bemoaning the falling sky, I'm simply acknowledging reality. Pitt came out a winner in the conference realignment lottery. However we did not come out unscathed - or anywhere close to unscathed. We are paying a fairly heavy price here and have been for some time now.

I am encouraged by the four game series Pitt and Penn State are slated to play. Those two schools should have never ceased playing and they only stopped because Paterno was powerful enough to act on his petty grudges.

However, he is now gone and - magically - suddenly there is again room on Penn State's schedule for Pitt.

What a surprise!

If Pitt can schedule an annual home-and-home with Penn State then all of this will have clearly been worth it. We still will have sacrificed annual games with our second and third biggest rivals in Notre Dame and West Virginia but we also would have gained an annual series with our top rival, Penn State and the relative security of the ACC.

All things considered that is a fairly reasonable trade.

That said, if we aren't playing Penn State every year (preferably on Thanksgiving Weekend), then we almost have to renew our series with West Virginia or risk becoming one of those schools that has no rivals and that is not appealing at all.

It's cool and fun to be the bane of another fan base's existence and we've had that with two large, passionate fan bases over the years - even though for much of the past three decades we have done very little to justify such respect/derision. I'd really hate to lose that special status and we can't afford to lose it with all of our aforementioned rivals all in the off chance that we may one day become Virginia Tech's second or third biggest game.

That will not suffice.

UNC already had to deal this issue with the removal of Clemson and Wake Forest from our yearly schedule. Now we see them once every 6 years with the rotating partners concept.

From a fan's perspective, I would love if all teams played their main rivals every year but unfortunately, it's not always feasible. Pitt needs to concentrate on being consistent first. If they over schedule now, they'll be sitting at home in December instead of going to a bowl game.

I don't think you're getting it, Penn State and West Virginia are not Clemson and Wake Forest for Pitt, they are Duke and UVA/NC State. I'm pretty sure people in Chapel Hill would not be happy if they said you don't get to play Duke yearly in basketball or UVA in football anymore. There's nothing anyone can do about it but all Pitt fans are saying is that we are disappointed right now with the loss of our major rivals. People outside of Western PA do not understand how intense and heated these two rivalries are.

Understood, but putting both programs back on the schedule on a yearly basis has a cost. I don't think Pitt can have those teams + ACC schedule and make it to a bowl game.
05-29-2013 06:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
7fielder Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,387
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 53
I Root For: Pittsburgh
Location: Seven Fields, PA
Post: #40
RE: Pitt/Hokie Fans: Schedule WVU Again?
(05-29-2013 11:17 AM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  
(05-29-2013 09:13 AM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  Don't get me wrong, we made the most of an eroding situation and I am thrilled to have landed where we did. However, Pitt has given up a LOT over the past several years now and no band aid is going to change that. The three games Pitt fans have always cared most about were Penn State, Notre Dame and West Virginia. It is very possible that none of those teams will appear on future schedules with any degree of regularity and that will definitely hurt interest in the program no matter how many trips North Carolina, Virginia Tech and even Florida State make to Heinz Field.

Pitt just signed a deal with Penn St for 2016-2019. There's talk of adding more. Pitt is already getting ND every three years. Va Tech may eventually replace WV but that will take time. Pitt also gets to renew their mini rivalry with Miami.

Don't trust the nitters for the paper that's written on. If the Big10 goes to nine conference games that series will never see the light of day.
05-29-2013 06:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.