(07-22-2013 11:03 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(07-21-2013 06:41 AM)Underdog Wrote:  

(07-20-2013 11:49 AM)BigHouston Wrote:  C'mon underdog, you not seriously comparing Kent St yellow helmet to UConn's upgraded one, right? Don't get me wrong, I too think there wasnt anything wrong with the old "C" helmet, but if I was to redesign the helmet, I will definitely chose this one.

Please explain to me how using half of a newly refined logo on a helmet is an "upgrade".

Underdog, I don't see a half logo in UConn's new redesign logo, anywhere... All I'm viewing is a Huskie with out the ears at center of the helmet, but much aggressive looking to what they previewsly had... And "UCONN" at back of helmet which by the way looks clean and slick, a nice finished-touch, IMO.

The logo is missing the ears, nose, most of the face, and mouth, which equals about half the logo. The name UCONN had to be placed on the helmet or it would be unrecognizable. Don’t get me wrong, the concept is good, but the implementation is incomplete....

Love 'em. Would look better with logos on the sides.