Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #61
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 08:42 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  1) You don't need to point out whom we've played. We know it, and have heard the same stuff from people like you for two years now.
Then don't go calling out teams better than you are.01-wingedeagle

2) Couldn't care less about whether any other startup programs played a tougher 2nd-year schedule? That's what I said and what I mean. I really couldn't care any less than I do. That's exactly why're you're ignorant on the subject, nope and I actually have looked and found none. Now you're more informed. You're welcome. What the hell are you even talking about? I'm talking about the FACT you haven't EVER beaten a halfway decent football team.
3) "the worst D1 schools that exist"? Four of them were ranked higher than you guys at season's end. Two of them finished the year ranked in the top 25, and three were within the top 25 at some point during the course of the season. Obviously not the worst. Besides, are you aware that East Carolina's strength of schedule last year was ranked 112 by Sagarin, while UTSA's was ranked 125? Not much difference there, is it? Of course you'll likely now try to discredit Sagarin to justify your response. Not to mention, in Phil Steele's 2013 pre-season Strength of Schedule rankings, UTSA is at 78 while East Carolina is at 97, and Marshall sits at 112.
Your only wins are against some of the worst football teams, not that you haven't tried to play some decent teams. You're touting your losses. There's a difference. I should have written that point more clearly in my earlier post. And no, I'm not about to discredit Sagarin ratings.

4) Obviously there's more potential in the future than there is this year because this will only be our 3rd season. Which is what I've been saying all along. You'll have more potential in the future, and until then, don't talk trash to other schools who have proven themselves to be better. Heck, it won't be until 2014 that we'll even have any seniors who've been with our program for 4 years. Telling me things I already know won't help your argument. And btw, that's why I'm only predicting 5-7 for us this year.

5) It was an unfair characterization because a team in its 2nd year obviously won't have a first-rate FBS caliber schedule, as I tried to explain. And rather than giving credit where it's due for us to have the toughest 2nd year schedule of any program, you and others instead want to discredit us because it's not as difficult as the schedules of D1 schools that have had football for decades upon decades already. You don't know much about our scheduling history do you? Credit would only be due if you ACTUALLY WON SOME OF THOSE GAMES

6) You obviously don't know a contradiction when you read one...lol. Yes, I said that we lack credibility in the eyes of many, but did I or did I not say that I feel our credibility is often unfairly compromised? My point is that you recognize other peoples' opinions, not that you agree with them. Did that part escape you perhaps? THAT'S why I criticized you for saying it, and criticize others as well. Do try to keep up.

7) "UTSA is a crap football team"... You've exposed yourself yet again...lol. Prove you AREN'T crap and we'll see.

8) No, I certainly don't want a conference of schools that are less than 40 years old, and love the fact that in just our third year, we're already in the same conference as an East Carolina team that's had football for 80 years. ; ) You are in our conference for one year. You're also in a conference with schools who haven't played a down of football in 50 years. This also proves my point about Marshall and their "mediocrity." UTSA has enjoyed far better opportunities than schools like Marshall had over a much longer period of time.

9) Yeah, I know we all get dumped on. And I'm sure you did your part in defending your school as well, so excuse me if defending mine somehow doesn't sit right with you.

Defend UTSA all you want. Here's what I see: a football team that for whatever reasons you care to name, have NEVER beaten a football team ranked in the top 100 of FBS. Is that wrong? I'm saying when you actually WIN some games against non-awful opponents, you will ahve earned the respect of fans of other teams. That has not happened yet.
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2013 09:11 PM by pir84evr.)
08-01-2013 09:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SApuro Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,016
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 74
I Root For: UTSA and USM
Location: Washington, D.C.
Post: #62
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
Move along butt pirate.
08-01-2013 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SATXBOSSMAN Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 541
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 23
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #63
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
Defend UTSA all you want. Here's what I see: a football team that for whatever reasons you care to name, have NEVER beaten a football team ranked in the top 100 of FBS. Is that wrong? I'm saying when you actually WIN some games against non-awful opponents, you will ahve earned the respect of fans of other teams. That has not happened yet.
[/quote]
This I can agree with. Just when it happens don't hesitate to congratulate us & show that respect.
08-01-2013 09:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #64
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:11 PM)SApuro Wrote:  Move along butt pirate.

So original. Whatever helps you sleep at night you delusional UTSA fans. Go earn some respect and we'll continue the conversation. 03-lmfao
08-01-2013 09:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #65
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 08:45 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  Point remains the same, UTSA (and ODU/Charlotte) have no standing or credibility with anyone to criticize anything about any of the other teams in C-USA. That's all I'm saying. As to the OP- technically the answer may be yes, but realistically the answer is obviously no.

Do you think UTSA can beat Marshall?

Stating facts is not criticizing. Get a dictionary. Marshall has hovered around .500 for a decade, the definition of mediocrity.
[/quote]

Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.
08-01-2013 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #66
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:12 PM)SATXBOSSMAN Wrote:  This I can agree with. Just when it happens don't hesitate to congratulate us & show that respect.

Respect to you SATX for that comment. Like I said, I will congratulate y'all if/when it happens, because you will have earned it.
08-01-2013 09:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fear The Beak Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 466
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 28
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #67
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.
08-01-2013 09:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fear The Beak Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 466
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 28
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #68
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 05:41 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Oh I'll be ready whenever it happens. I'm saying UTSA won't be competitive (over .750 in conference) for at least 3 more years. If the UTSA football team proves me wrong, I'll happily admit it.

Over .750 in conference? That is your definition of competitive? So you're saying 3/4 of every team in FBS is not competitive, because on average, only 1/4 will win 75% of their games. 01-wingedeagle
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2013 09:29 PM by Fear The Beak.)
08-01-2013 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #69
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:22 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. It's actually the exact opposite. This started with a UTSA fan taking a shot at Marshall and me saying any UTSA fan with that attitude/outlook should wait until they can BEAT a team they criticize and that you have a complete lack of credibility until that happens. Pretty relevant. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

I never said you wouldn't win any games. Check the posts. Seriously.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.

Yeah so don't call out teams you can't beat and don't argue that the teams you lost to make you good.
08-01-2013 09:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Offline
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
Post: #70
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:34 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:22 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. It's actually the exact opposite. This started with a UTSA fan taking a shot at Marshall and me saying any UTSA fan with that attitude/outlook should wait until they can BEAT a team they criticize and that you have a complete lack of credibility until that happens. Pretty relevant. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

I never said you wouldn't win any games. Check the posts. Seriously.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.

Yeah so don't call out teams you can't beat and don't argue that the teams you lost to make you good.

But we havent played them yet. I dont think anybody here called out a team that beat us. There is a reason why the games are played on the field. I remember when people used to say "Wait until you play any games" We surpassed expectations. Then people started saying "Wait until you play FBS teams, you wont be able to win one game", again we surpassed expectations. Now people are saying "You have to beat top 100 teams, and then you can earn your respect". The way this is going, I guess we'll never earn any respect even if we win the National Championship lol
08-01-2013 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #71
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:26 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 05:41 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Oh I'll be ready whenever it happens. I'm saying UTSA won't be competitive (over .750 in conference) for at least 3 more years. If the UTSA football team proves me wrong, I'll happily admit it.

Over .750 in conference? That is your definition of competitive? So you're saying 3/4 of every team in FBS is not competitive, because on average, only 1/4 will win 75% of their games. 01-wingedeagle

I'm saying this- look at C-USA this year. Any of the teams that win 3/4 of their conference games are gonna be at or near the top. That's competitive to me. I expect to see a maximum of 6 competitive teams in the whole conference. Each year is a different story. This year, UTSA will not win 3/4 of their conference games, so no, not competitive. Southern Miss last year- not competitive, but for most of the years prior, they were near the top of the conference, so most years, Southern Miss is at least competitive. Tulsa qualifies as competitive, Tulane doesn't (except 1998 was it?). See what I mean?

Winning a conference championship is the ultimate goal for the season, is it not? If you can't win 3/4 of your conference games, you aren't going to win a championship any time soon. So how would a team consider themselves competitive if they can't get to the top 25% of their conference?
08-01-2013 09:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pir84evr Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 4
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: Virginia
Post: #72
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:45 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:34 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:22 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. It's actually the exact opposite. This started with a UTSA fan taking a shot at Marshall and me saying any UTSA fan with that attitude/outlook should wait until they can BEAT a team they criticize and that you have a complete lack of credibility until that happens. Pretty relevant. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

I never said you wouldn't win any games. Check the posts. Seriously.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.

Yeah so don't call out teams you can't beat and don't argue that the teams you lost to make you good.

But we havent played them yet. I dont think anybody here called out a team that beat us. I think everyone here knows UTSA would not beat Marshall. You haven't played yet. I get that. But really, what do you expect? There is a reason why the games are played on the field. I remember when people used to say "Wait until you play any games" We surpassed expectations. Ok, so you beat bad Div 2 teams and the worst of Division 1. Then people started saying "Wait until you play FBS teams, you wont be able to win one game", again we surpassed expectations. Now people are saying "You have to beat top 100 teams, and then you can earn your respect". The way this is going, I guess we'll never earn any respect even if we win the National Championship lol

No, it's just that it's a long way to go from beginning a team to winning against the top 100. The day UTSA beats a top 100 team AND wins 75% of their conference games in the same year, I will give plenty of respect and will even defend y'all as I do Marshall because to me, you have to earn it.

Speaking of respect, I just noticed your handle. Thank you (and any other vets) for your service to our country.
08-01-2013 09:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Offline
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
Post: #73
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:54 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:45 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:34 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:22 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. It's actually the exact opposite. This started with a UTSA fan taking a shot at Marshall and me saying any UTSA fan with that attitude/outlook should wait until they can BEAT a team they criticize and that you have a complete lack of credibility until that happens. Pretty relevant. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

I never said you wouldn't win any games. Check the posts. Seriously.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.

Yeah so don't call out teams you can't beat and don't argue that the teams you lost to make you good.

But we havent played them yet. I dont think anybody here called out a team that beat us. I think everyone here knows UTSA would not beat Marshall. You haven't played yet. I get that. But really, what do you expect? There is a reason why the games are played on the field. I remember when people used to say "Wait until you play any games" We surpassed expectations. Ok, so you beat bad Div 2 teams and the worst of Division 1. Then people started saying "Wait until you play FBS teams, you wont be able to win one game", again we surpassed expectations. Now people are saying "You have to beat top 100 teams, and then you can earn your respect". The way this is going, I guess we'll never earn any respect even if we win the National Championship lol

No, it's just that it's a long way to go from beginning a team to winning against the top 100. The day UTSA beats a top 100 team AND wins 75% of their conference games in the same year, I will give plenty of respect and will even defend y'all as I do Marshall because to me, you have to earn it.

Speaking of respect, I just noticed your handle. Thank you (and any other vets) for your service to our country.

Thank you for the support, I am a big fan of ECU. I used to go watch yall play when I was stationed in Camp Lejeune. I still have an ECU basketball and football jersey.

And just one question. Did anybody in their right mind expected Appalachian State to beat Michigan? I mean thats why the games are played on the field. Do we expect to beat Marshall? Nope. Is there a possibility that we might? You bet there is. It might be a small one, but there is still a possibility.
08-01-2013 10:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Volkmar Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,380
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 482
I Root For: U.T.S.A.
Location: Richmond, Texas
Post: #74
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:06 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 08:42 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  1) You don't need to point out whom we've played. We know it, and have heard the same stuff from people like you for two years now.
Then don't go calling out teams better than you are.01-wingedeagle

2) Couldn't care less about whether any other startup programs played a tougher 2nd-year schedule? That's what I said and what I mean. I really couldn't care any less than I do. That's exactly why're you're ignorant on the subject, nope and I actually have looked and found none. Now you're more informed. You're welcome. What the hell are you even talking about? I'm talking about the FACT you haven't EVER beaten a halfway decent football team.
3) "the worst D1 schools that exist"? Four of them were ranked higher than you guys at season's end. Two of them finished the year ranked in the top 25, and three were within the top 25 at some point during the course of the season. Obviously not the worst. Besides, are you aware that East Carolina's strength of schedule last year was ranked 112 by Sagarin, while UTSA's was ranked 125? Not much difference there, is it? Of course you'll likely now try to discredit Sagarin to justify your response. Not to mention, in Phil Steele's 2013 pre-season Strength of Schedule rankings, UTSA is at 78 while East Carolina is at 97, and Marshall sits at 112.
Your only wins are against some of the worst football teams, not that you haven't tried to play some decent teams. You're touting your losses. There's a difference. I should have written that point more clearly in my earlier post. And no, I'm not about to discredit Sagarin ratings.

4) Obviously there's more potential in the future than there is this year because this will only be our 3rd season. Which is what I've been saying all along. You'll have more potential in the future, and until then, don't talk trash to other schools who have proven themselves to be better. Heck, it won't be until 2014 that we'll even have any seniors who've been with our program for 4 years. Telling me things I already know won't help your argument. And btw, that's why I'm only predicting 5-7 for us this year.

5) It was an unfair characterization because a team in its 2nd year obviously won't have a first-rate FBS caliber schedule, as I tried to explain. And rather than giving credit where it's due for us to have the toughest 2nd year schedule of any program, you and others instead want to discredit us because it's not as difficult as the schedules of D1 schools that have had football for decades upon decades already. You don't know much about our scheduling history do you? Credit would only be due if you ACTUALLY WON SOME OF THOSE GAMES

6) You obviously don't know a contradiction when you read one...lol. Yes, I said that we lack credibility in the eyes of many, but did I or did I not say that I feel our credibility is often unfairly compromised? My point is that you recognize other peoples' opinions, not that you agree with them. Did that part escape you perhaps? THAT'S why I criticized you for saying it, and criticize others as well. Do try to keep up.

7) "UTSA is a crap football team"... You've exposed yourself yet again...lol. Prove you AREN'T crap and we'll see.

8) No, I certainly don't want a conference of schools that are less than 40 years old, and love the fact that in just our third year, we're already in the same conference as an East Carolina team that's had football for 80 years. ; ) You are in our conference for one year. You're also in a conference with schools who haven't played a down of football in 50 years. This also proves my point about Marshall and their "mediocrity." UTSA has enjoyed far better opportunities than schools like Marshall had over a much longer period of time.

9) Yeah, I know we all get dumped on. And I'm sure you did your part in defending your school as well, so excuse me if defending mine somehow doesn't sit right with you.

Defend UTSA all you want. Here's what I see: a football team that for whatever reasons you care to name, have NEVER beaten a football team ranked in the top 100 of FBS. Is that wrong? I'm saying when you actually WIN some games against non-awful opponents, you will ahve earned the respect of fans of other teams. That has not happened yet.

Here we go again...

1) I didn't call out anyone. I didn't start this. I responded in defense. You however did start this with me when it didn't even concern you or East Carolina in the first place.

2) Again, you're telling me things I already know.

3) The discussion was about the schedule, not whom either of us beat...lol. You originally implied we played the worst D1 schools. My response was with regard to that. So don't try to now change it to whom we beat. Nice try.

4) You call defending my university trash talk? First of all, I take care to be accurate with regard to what I state, and if things weren't said about UTSA first, this conversation wouldn't even be happening.

5) Coming from a school that scored a total of 24 points in your first 3 seasons COMBINED, and were outscored by a cumulative 372-24 during those seasons, you sure have room to talk. It wasn't until your 9th season that you guys even had your first winning record, and that was against MUCH lighter competition than what we faced last year when we finished 8-4.

6) No, you actually missed the whole point, which is why I had to again correct you. Besides, I recognize everyone's points...lol. And if I disagree with them, I'm well within my right to state so and refute, just as you are.

7) Refer to #5 above. And compared to the better D1 programs, of course a two-year program will be crap. Talk about stating the obvious. But again, we went 8-4 last year against a schedule more difficult than any other 2nd-year program.

8) I know you guys are leaving. It doesn't change the validity of my statement. Yes, in a sense, UTSA is fortunate to be in the position we're in (especially considering the youth of our program), but it took us 40 years just to get a football team to begin with, so we're probably not as fortunate as you may think we are. It was a long, frustrating wait to say the least.

And lastly, I certainly will defend UTSA all I want. Again, yes our wins were against weak teams, but you guys couldn't even beat them in your first 3 years, so you're again not putting things in perspective and at least giving us some credit where it's due. Must admit though, Guilford who beat you guys 79-0 in season 1, and Lenoir-Rhyne who beat you 47-0 in season 3 were forces to be reckoned with.
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2013 10:08 PM by Volkmar.)
08-01-2013 10:02 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Volkmar Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,380
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 482
I Root For: U.T.S.A.
Location: Richmond, Texas
Post: #75
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
Pir84evr, we're apparently like Godzilla and Rodan. I'll call dibs on this guy...lol.

[Image: godzilla20002.jpg]

Seriously though. I'm not here to make enemies. It's not my style. Just taking up for my university. You have much to be proud of with ECU, but I'm equally as proud of UTSA. Maybe we should just leave it at that.
08-01-2013 10:54 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slow-runner Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 577
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 14
I Root For: UTSA
Location: Austin, TX
Post: #76
UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 10:54 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  Pir84evr, we're apparently like Godzilla and Rodan. I'll call dibs on this guy...lol.

[Image: godzilla20002.jpg]

Seriously though. I'm not here to make enemies. It's not my style. Just taking up for my university. You have much to be proud of with ECU, but I'm equally as proud of UTSA. Maybe we should just leave it at that.

As an aside: while I liked the twins, I could never understand the appeal of Mothra.
08-01-2013 11:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Volkmar Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,380
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 482
I Root For: U.T.S.A.
Location: Richmond, Texas
Post: #77
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 11:00 PM)slow-runner Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 10:54 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  Pir84evr, we're apparently like Godzilla and Rodan. I'll call dibs on this guy...lol.

[Image: godzilla20002.jpg]

Seriously though. I'm not here to make enemies. It's not my style. Just taking up for my university. You have much to be proud of with ECU, but I'm equally as proud of UTSA. Maybe we should just leave it at that.

As an aside: while I liked the twins, I could never understand the appeal of Mothra.

I'd have liked the twins if they weren't the size of my hand...lol. Agree with you on Mothra. Now, if Mothra would've been able to shoot that thread as an adult that it could in its larval stage, then we might have something...haha.
08-01-2013 11:05 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fear The Beak Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 466
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 28
I Root For: UTSA
Location: San Antonio
Post: #78
RE: UTSA eligible for the C-USA title?
(08-01-2013 09:34 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:22 PM)Fear The Beak Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 09:17 PM)pir84evr Wrote:  Why not just answer the question? You couldn't beat them this year. And you won't be able to next year or the year after. And Marshall has been around .500 for a few years, yes. You still can't beat 'em yet.

Debating whether or not UTSA can beat Marshall or any other team in C-USA is pointless. It's actually the exact opposite. This started with a UTSA fan taking a shot at Marshall and me saying any UTSA fan with that attitude/outlook should wait until they can BEAT a team they criticize and that you have a complete lack of credibility until that happens. Pretty relevant. We'll see what happens on the field, just like last year when we finished fourth in the WAC when they were saying the same things as you...we had NO CHANCE for even one win.

I never said you wouldn't win any games. Check the posts. Seriously.

And about not having beat a top-100 team...really? We've only played two years, gimme a break.

Yeah so don't call out teams you can't beat and don't argue that the teams you lost to make you good.

Wow, you should really pay attention. I never argued that teams we lost to made us good. You're making crap up now. And you have no idea who we can beat. So get over your hard-on for Marshall...funny how a Marshall fan dumps on us, I say one comment about them being mediocre, and you're all butt-hurt and can't shut up about it. Was Marshall your #1 choice and you had to settle for ECU or what?
08-02-2013 10:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.