These are the national ranking the NCAA is reporting for C-USA's teams after week 3:

Scoring Offense

12. Marshall 46 PPG
35. UTEP 38.5 PPG
57. Tulane 32.3 PPG
58. UNT 31.7 PPG
60. ECU 31 PPG
72. MT 27.3 PPG
76. Rice 27 PPG
85. UAB 24 PPG
NR UTSA 23 PPG
102. Tulsa 19 PPG
103. LA Tech 18.7 PPG
114. FAU 15.7 PPG
121. S. Miss 10.3 PPG
122. FIU 7.7 PPG

Scoring Defense

23. Marshall 16 PPG
42. UNT 20 PPG
48. Tulane 21 PPG
53. ECU 22 PPG
65. FAU 25 PPG
71. LA Tech 26 PPG
73. MT 26.3 PPG
91. UTEP 31.5 PPG
96. Rice 33 PPG
99. S. Miss 34 PPG
NR UTSA 35.6 PPG
111. Tulsa 37.3 PPG
114. FIU 38.3 PPG
121. UAB 45 PPG

Some of these numbers are misleading due to the very different strength of schedule our teams are playing, but they are interesting to look at. The NCAA isn't reporting UTSA's numbers. I don't know why. Maybe they are still in a transition period or something.

Some of these numbers are misleading due to the very different strength of schedule our teams are playing, but they are interesting to look at. The NCAA isn't reporting UTSA's numbers. I don't know why. Maybe they are still in a transition period or something. (quote)

They probably think they are us. LOL! They're half right. Ootsa is proud to be compared to us, I hear.

(09-15-2013 05:22 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Some of these numbers are misleading due to the very different strength of schedule our teams are playing, but they are interesting to look at. The NCAA isn't reporting UTSA's numbers. I don't know why. Maybe they are still in a transition period or something. (quote)

They probably think they are us. LOL! They're half right. Ootsa is proud to be compared to us, I hear.

Not quite, bahhhbahhh. We're probably not listed because we're still not considered a full FBS member yet. This is the final year of our transition.

(09-15-2013 05:29 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  

(09-15-2013 05:22 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Some of these numbers are misleading due to the very different strength of schedule our teams are playing, but they are interesting to look at. The NCAA isn't reporting UTSA's numbers. I don't know why. Maybe they are still in a transition period or something. (quote)

They probably think they are us. LOL! They're half right. Ootsa is proud to be compared to us, I hear.

Not quite, bahhhbahhh. We're probably not listed because we're still not considered a full FBS member yet. This is the final year of our transition.

That's bad. To be a non-entity.

(09-15-2013 05:39 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-15-2013 05:29 PM)Volkmar Wrote:  

(09-15-2013 05:22 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Some of these numbers are misleading due to the very different strength of schedule our teams are playing, but they are interesting to look at. The NCAA isn't reporting UTSA's numbers. I don't know why. Maybe they are still in a transition period or something. (quote)

They probably think they are us. LOL! They're half right. Ootsa is proud to be compared to us, I hear.

Not quite, bahhhbahhh. We're probably not listed because we're still not considered a full FBS member yet. This is the final year of our transition.

That's bad. To be a non-entity.

Sheesh, will you cut it out. Ootsa fan even steals my emoticon.

I'm just hanging out waiting for PirateMarv to tell us Marshall's numbers are drastically overstated while ECU's are drastically understated.

Hey, we can score over and over..... But our defense will let you do that too, and then some more.