L-yes Wrote:ShoreBuc Wrote:CardinalZen Wrote:ShoreBuc,
I helped my folks move this weekend and came across an old Louisville Courier-Journal sports page from 1996. I wasn't saved for any special reason, it was just some packing material in an old box.
I opened it and was skimming through it, and guess what I saw?
Well, your ECU pirates had just defeated the Miami Hurricanes by 31 to 7. Amazing coincidence!
I remember thinking that I hope my Cardinals fare better over the next decade than your beleaguered program after that victory!
Please don't take this as smack, as I hold no ill will toward the Pirates. It's just that one victory over Miami is no guarantee of anything.
Huge difference is UL has BCS access. If you guys run the table beat WVU at home you will be in a BCS Bowl in Jan and that is huge. So I would say it is not that one win against Miami that makes you a BCS power it is a combination of wins and direction of the UL Program.
By the way we beat Miami twice, 97 and then again in 99 but that has not gotten us anywhere as of late.
Weren't they on probation then or just coming out of probation? I can't remember.
Coming out of probation but still a damn good team.
In 1996 Miami was Big East Co-Champions.
They beat.
Rutgers 33-0
Pitt 45-0
WVU 10-7
BC 43-26
Syracuse 38-31
The only teams that beat them were
ECU 31-6
FSU 34-16
VT 21-7
They beat UVA 31-21 in the Carquest Bowl
Finished #14 in Final Poll
1999
Miami beat
Ohio St,BC,WVU,PITT,Rutgers, Temple,Baylor,Syracuse and Florida A&M Finished 2nd in BigEast
They lost to
Penn St,ECU,FSU and VT
Beat Georgia Tech in the Gator Bowl
Finished #15 in the Final Poll
So unless they make it back to the Top 25 and finish higher then #14 or #15 you could argue that we beat better Miami teams then we saw on Saturday. We also shut down Edgerin James and Santana Moss to win our games which was no easy task.
Not beating the chest on this ancient history either just pointing out what we hear a lot and that is we beat Miami on probation like they were sisters of the poor then and that is simply not accurate. Not their best teams of all time but certainly not their weakest.