(03-12-2014 08:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:40 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:18 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it has nothing to do with the b12 but certain posters systematically bashing the ACC using half truths, misconceptions, & flat out lies because they can't handle the truth that the acc isn't very far behind the b12 $$$ wise.

i could care less what the b12 is up to, i just don't like seeing all this cr.ap being slung at the ACC.

OK, sounds like you need to take it up with those fans then.

look in the mirror bro.

Well I've seen from your obvious ACC agenda you are a bit delusional and now its cleared up completely. You are all the way there.

Look, everyone on this board isn't going to agree with you or put down other conferences because you don't like them. You'll have to deal with that or probably have a stroke.

well for starters i am a self described b10 homer. saying I have an "acc agenda" is a pretty big joke. all i do is look at things from a non biased perspective and come to a conclusion. the two largest media sources say 20 mill and on top of that there are countless other newspapers which say the same. from what i have seen from you so far is that you are joining todge as our resident acc troll. you continue to use misleading facts and you whine over the most ridiculous s**t.

"the ACC won't make a whole lot of ncaa tourny revenue......here look at these stats from last year when the acc was a 12 team conference and didn't get a team into the FF as a bunchmark to prove this"

"oh you can't say 20 mill because it only says expected"

"oh we don't know for sure if duke, unc, su, & ville will make the FF on a regular basis"

like i said you adamantly refuse to adhere to reality and won't accept anything less than the acc being $10 mill behind the b12. and the worst part is you ask this way because any thought that the acc makes 1.5 mill per school more than you originally thought scares the cr.ap outta you.

take your BS and move along troll.

Not sure anyone is buying that you are a Big Ten homer when you are becoming so irrational and irate about information being discussed about the ACC.

Georgia Tech told the AJC what the ACC's numbers are and mulitple articles have been posted showing what they are. You are attempting to embellish them and trying to censor any discussion on the matter.

No one said that certain ACC teams would never make the NCAA's, you claimed they always would and acted as though adding a few teams has caused the ACC to pass every other conference by, when I pointed out the ACC is the fifth rated conference right now with all the added teams except UL in it.

If you want to put the Big Ten, Big 12, Pac 12 numbers up in comparison to the ACC's we can do that. Can probably throw in what's known about the SEC's numbers as well. Don't know why that scares you so much, but the numbers are what they are. Anger because your conferences payouts are lower should be addressed to the conference HQ, not posters on a message board talking about it.

And no, it isn't trolling to discuss real numbers, but it might be to attack a poster repeatedly for trying to peacefully discuss information about realignment on a realignment board.

(03-12-2014 09:01 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:40 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:18 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  OK, sounds like you need to take it up with those fans then.

look in the mirror bro.

Well I've seen from your obvious ACC agenda you are a bit delusional and now its cleared up completely. You are all the way there.

Look, everyone on this board isn't going to agree with you or put down other conferences because you don't like them. You'll have to deal with that or probably have a stroke.

well for starters i am a self described b10 homer. saying I have an "acc agenda" is a pretty big joke. all i do is look at things from a non biased perspective and come to a conclusion. the two largest media sources say 20 mill and on top of that there are countless other newspapers which say the same. from what i have seen from you so far is that you are joining todge as our resident acc troll. you continue to use misleading facts and you whine over the most ridiculous s**t.

"the ACC won't make a whole lot of ncaa tourny revenue......here look at these stats from last year when the acc was a 12 team conference and didn't get a team into the FF as a bunchmark to prove this"

"oh you can't say 20 mill because it only says expected"

"oh we don't know for sure if duke, unc, su, & ville will make the FF on a regular basis"

like i said you adamantly refuse to adhere to reality and won't accept anything less than the acc being $10 mill behind the b12. and the worst part is you ask this way because any thought that the acc makes 1.5 mill per school more than you originally thought scares the cr.ap outta you.

take your BS and move along troll.

Not sure anyone is buying that you are a Big Ten homer when you are becoming so irrational and irate about information being discussed about the ACC.

Georgia Tech told the AJC what the ACC's numbers are and mulitple articles have been posted showing what they are. You are attempting to embellish them and trying to censor any discussion on the matter.

No one said that certain ACC teams would never make the NCAA's, you claimed they always would and acted as though adding a few teams has caused the ACC to pass every other conference by, when I pointed out the ACC is the fifth rated conference right now with all the added teams except UL in it.

If you want to put the Big Ten, Big 12, Pac 12 numbers up in comparison to the ACC's we can do that. Can probably throw in what's known about the SEC's numbers as well. Don't know why that scares you so much, but the numbers are what they are. Anger because your conferences payouts are lower should be addressed to the conference HQ, not posters on a message board talking about it.

And no, it isn't trolling to discuss real numbers, but it might be to attack a poster repeatedly for trying to peacefully discuss information about realignment on a realignment board.

lmao call me irrational and then proceed to argue your irrational troll points.

1. it is totally irrational to compare the previous 12 team acc to projections related to the 15 team acc. ESPECIALLY when the whole point of my argument is that the teams they are going to add will be the teams that bring in more $$$.

2. continue to deny reality but the majority of media sources say 20 mill.

3. it is trolling to bash the acc on an acc thread and to do so with misconceptions and white lies. on top of that you act like anyone who defends the acc must be an acc fan. ==> no that is not "peacefully discussing information" that is straight up trolling.

(03-12-2014 09:11 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 09:01 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:40 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  

(03-12-2014 08:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  look in the mirror bro.

Well I've seen from your obvious ACC agenda you are a bit delusional and now its cleared up completely. You are all the way there.

Look, everyone on this board isn't going to agree with you or put down other conferences because you don't like them. You'll have to deal with that or probably have a stroke.

well for starters i am a self described b10 homer. saying I have an "acc agenda" is a pretty big joke. all i do is look at things from a non biased perspective and come to a conclusion. the two largest media sources say 20 mill and on top of that there are countless other newspapers which say the same. from what i have seen from you so far is that you are joining todge as our resident acc troll. you continue to use misleading facts and you whine over the most ridiculous s**t.

"the ACC won't make a whole lot of ncaa tourny revenue......here look at these stats from last year when the acc was a 12 team conference and didn't get a team into the FF as a bunchmark to prove this"

"oh you can't say 20 mill because it only says expected"

"oh we don't know for sure if duke, unc, su, & ville will make the FF on a regular basis"

like i said you adamantly refuse to adhere to reality and won't accept anything less than the acc being $10 mill behind the b12. and the worst part is you ask this way because any thought that the acc makes 1.5 mill per school more than you originally thought scares the cr.ap outta you.

take your BS and move along troll.

Not sure anyone is buying that you are a Big Ten homer when you are becoming so irrational and irate about information being discussed about the ACC.

Georgia Tech told the AJC what the ACC's numbers are and mulitple articles have been posted showing what they are. You are attempting to embellish them and trying to censor any discussion on the matter.

No one said that certain ACC teams would never make the NCAA's, you claimed they always would and acted as though adding a few teams has caused the ACC to pass every other conference by, when I pointed out the ACC is the fifth rated conference right now with all the added teams except UL in it.

If you want to put the Big Ten, Big 12, Pac 12 numbers up in comparison to the ACC's we can do that. Can probably throw in what's known about the SEC's numbers as well. Don't know why that scares you so much, but the numbers are what they are. Anger because your conferences payouts are lower should be addressed to the conference HQ, not posters on a message board talking about it.

And no, it isn't trolling to discuss real numbers, but it might be to attack a poster repeatedly for trying to peacefully discuss information about realignment on a realignment board.

lmao call me irrational and then proceed to argue your irrational troll points.

1. it is totally irrational to compare the previous 12 team acc to projections related to the 15 team acc. ESPECIALLY when the whole point of my argument is that the teams they are going to add will be the teams that bring in more $$$.

2. continue to deny reality but the majority of media sources say 20 mill.

3. it is trolling to bash the acc on an acc thread and to do so with misconceptions and white lies. on top of that you act like anyone who defends the acc must be an acc fan. ==> no that is not "peacefully discussing information" that is straight up trolling.

What is irrational is to take the numbers for the 15 team current ACC, pretend they aren't the numbers for the current ACC and then try to bash posters for discussing the numbers.

Its irrational to pick and choose only articles that discuss a possibility of a number, but completely ignore the articles that describe the real numbers in detail and pretend they don't exist.

I haven't bashed the ACC, the ACC thread is about why it may be vulnerable still, and I haven't uttered any lies, while you have bashed posters, myself, the Big 12, the Big Ten and the other power conferences. You appear to be the troll to me and the only one here with any issues. You want to make up information and censor anyone who dares to correct the information.

Seriously-what is the problem? Are you saying Georgia Tech is lying? The AJC is lying? You need to learn to deal with reality.

59 of 62 posts in this thread alone spanning just three days. Odd... very odd.

(03-12-2014 07:14 PM)Tbringer Wrote:  Everyone worried about posters discussing conference numbers and realignment on a realignment board apparently has a pro ACC agenda.

Nah. I am personally way more anti-Big Ten than I am pro-ACC.

You seem to be pushing a "Look out, the big bad Big Ten is going to raid the ACC" mission statement, for whatever reason (like message boards matter in the real world).

This one has run its course.