(04-30-2014 11:11 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:56 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Alright it is not unconstitutional. However, His private property rights are weakened. That is a problem. Even though this guy is scum, all our property rights are weakened.

The NBA is an association. The owners likely have to sign a contract that explains how they must conduct business according to the leagues specifications.

They probably could have dropped the Clippers from the league if they wanted to.

That would have totally ruined the business. He's lucky he only got a 2.5 million dollar fine.

Yes, the real threat to him is the sponsors pulling out not this tiny fine (by his measure)... Those sponsors are of course just using their right of association

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

Even if she recorded and leaked the tape is that a violation of the law?

Serious Question, it varies from state to state..

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

Even if she recorded and leaked the tape is that a violation of the law?

Serious Question, it varies from state to state..

In California it would be illegal is Sterling wasn't aware that he was being taped.

(04-30-2014 11:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

Then thats between her and the police and has nothing to do with the Clippers.

(04-30-2014 11:18 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

Then thats between her and the police and has nothing to do with the Clippers.

You are correct.

Why Sterling may fight to keep the Clippers.

Sterling, NBA Set for Epic Legal Fight to Keep Clippers

(04-30-2014 01:01 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Why Sterling may fight to keep the Clippers.

Sterling, NBA Set for Epic Legal Fight to Keep Clippers

At the very least, under CA law, half the team is Shelly Sterling's...and she isn't banned for life.

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:24 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:14 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

Question. Are you for or against equality?

.....? Fill me in on the point you're trying to make here.

No need, you said exactly what I figured you would say.

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

There's almost 400 posts about the owner on here... 5 posts about his ugly gold digger isn't a deflection. She looks good for an 80 year old man, but not one that makes over $40,000 a year.

The things a gold-digger will do for a Bentley. Feminists should be proud.

(04-30-2014 11:18 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

Then thats between her and the police and has nothing to do with the Clippers.

Are you ok?

(04-30-2014 01:16 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:18 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:13 AM)VA49er Wrote:  No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.

The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

Then thats between her and the police and has nothing to do with the Clippers.

Are you ok?

No, I'm Drew :-)

(04-30-2014 01:15 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The things a gold-digger will do for a Bentley. Feminists should be proud.

Yeah, she taught that dirty old egotistical bastard chauvinist pig a lesson in what happens when you tell your girlfriend not to come to games with black guys! The racist son of a biitch!

(04-30-2014 01:17 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 01:16 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:18 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:16 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 11:15 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  The NBA isn't a law enforcement body...they simply enforce their own rules.

It won't be the NBA arresting her.

Then thats between her and the police and has nothing to do with the Clippers.

Are you ok?

No, I'm Drew :-)

Just making sure, Drew. Nobody was claiming that the Clippers or NBA should address what she did if the law was broken.

I can't help but think that so many of these self interested folks feigning outrage are doing so because they are more than happy to divert attention away from themselves and are really just happy they didn't get caught saying anything like it.

Self interested outrage doesn't impress me.

(04-30-2014 01:09 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:24 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:14 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

Question. Are you for or against equality?

.....? Fill me in on the point you're trying to make here.

No need, you said exactly what I figured you would say.

Yes. Bad things happen to bad people.

(05-01-2014 10:07 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 01:09 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:24 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:14 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

Question. Are you for or against equality?

.....? Fill me in on the point you're trying to make here.

No need, you said exactly what I figured you would say.

Yes. Bad things happen to bad people.

Just like anyone else that wants "equality," you just can't find the right "yes or no" answer, can you.

You, and others like you, want a certain kind of equality, one that means the state of certain people being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities while pushing "others" (not so important to you) to the side.

I, and others like me, want the kind that doesn't JUST include certain people, but instead, includes every American. That's why I knew you couldn't answer my simple yes or no question.

"Bad things happen to bad people" is just your way of calling those who you push off to the side bad.