Is the Big East irrelevant in College Football?
When you think of the Big East Conference in college sports, chances are the first thing that comes to your mind is how deadly it is -- in basketball.
What? Did you seriously think I was going to say football?
Syracuse, Connecticut, West Virginia, Louisville, and others tend to scare the pants off plenty of teams on the court, but on the football field, laughter is the first thing that comes to mind when the Big East is uttered out of someone's mouth.
In the beginning of this year the Georgia Bulldogs took on the West Virginia Mountaineers in the Sugar Bowl.
Many experts predicted this game to be a big joke by thinking that Georgia was going to easily walk away with a victory.
The Mountaineers had other plans as they made these so-called experts look foolish as they won the Sugar Bowl.
We saw the coming out parties for running back Steve Slaton --- who is now a top five Heisman candidate, and quarterback Pat White had a solid game with a mix of passing and rushing to humiliate the overwhelming favorite Bulldogs.
With the win in a major bowl, the Big East would finally get the credibility that they needed to be a major threat for the national title, right?
There are three teams in that conference that are in the top-25 - two of which are still undefeated - the Rutgers Scarlet Knights and the Louisville Cardinals.
People like to joke around and call the Big East the Big Least because of their lack of power.
In case people haven't realized it, the Pac-10 and the Big 12 don't exactly have that much fire power in their arsenal either.
The Big 12 may have Texas, Oklahoma, and Texas A&M, and the Pac-10 with USC, California, and Oregon, but put them in against any SEC or Big Ten teams and we'll see who really has the power.
Lately, I've been listening to ESPN Radio and I hear that when the Big Ten powerhouses -No.1 Ohio State and No. 2 Michigan - play each other, and the match comes out really close, then it's possible that the two may meet again for the National Championship regardless if Rutgers or Louisville go undefeated.
Should the Big East make a case for a title bid?
Absolutely.
We don't need another 2004 drama that the BCS gave us with Oklahoma, USC, Auburn, Utah, and Boise State whining over who should or shouldn't play for the title.
I believe if you go through the regular season without a blemish, you deserve at least a shot at the championship, and we can keep complaining about having a playoff system, but holding our breaths can result in a lot of deaths.
Whoever loses between Ohio State and Michigan, I feel that their title shot is done.
In case the BCS forgot, there are six "power" conferences - one of them being the Big East.
So if a Big East team goes undefeated, then that should give them credibility because they had a perfect season in that particular "power" conference.
I love how the BCS likes to compensate by saying, "But the Big East is not as strong as the other five conferences."
Then why put them in that spot if you feel they are worthless?
Tell me why Louisville and West Virginia started the season as two of the top ten teams in the country if the BCS has no confidence in them.
To see Louisville or Rutgers in the title game would be a huge treat, and it would be a bigger treat if they end up wining the entire thing.
I know the BCS has a huge problem with determining who goes to the title game, but let's be honest, they are known to be a bit unfair.
I never liked the idea of a using a computer to help in finding out who is the best team every year.
That's like depending on Ryan Leaf to carry you to the Super Bowl.
We may have gotten lucky last year with USC and Texas being the only two undefeated teams left, but I want to see the Cardinals or the Scarlet Knights in that title game if they are perfect.
I think it's time we start rooting for the Big East and not rebuke them.
|