Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
Author Message
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #161
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-11-2014 07:04 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 06:41 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 06:22 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 12:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 12:41 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you forgot baylor.

I think athletically, they can do it because they have almost an identical recruiting pool size as compared to Texas.

Academically they can easily do it because they have only one big name private school to compete with and no #2 public AAU school whereas Texas has A&M (who is AAU) plus baylor, tcu, rice, & smu

i don't think you can say texas, texas a&m, texas tech, & Houston would be drastically different than Florida, Florida State, UCF, & USF.

I think there would be.

I don't see Houston entering into this because the Big12 really isn't interested.

Texas, A&M, and Tech are close enough to one another but there is a huge gap between Florida/FSU and UC/SF. They aren't in the same league as top to bottom institutions.

And, like 10th pointed out, 4 public P5 programs?

And how exactly are they that different? Are you talking athletically or academically. The difference is the dollars. Ucf and usf meet all the metrics in the state of Florida to be a flagship school. We aren't aau and weren't even able to be ranked until recently because we just turned 50. Now as far as incoming freshman ucf is second just behind uf by a couple of points. Why would you wait 10 years to add someone if you can give someone the resources to be that much more valuable in the future


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App


State of NC - 10 million population - 4 P-5 = 2.5 million per P-5
3 G5's = 1.25 million per P/G 5

Public UNC/NCSU/ECU/Charlotte/App State
Private Duke/Wake

State of Fla - 18 million population - 3 P-5 = 6 million per P-5
4 G5's = 2.5 million per P/G 5

Public - Florida, FSU, UCF, USF, Florida Atlantic, Florida International
Private - Miami

State of Texas 26 million population - 4 P-5 = 6.5 million per P-5
5 G5's = 2.9 million per P/G 5

Public - Texas, TAMU, Houston, SMU, TT, UTEP
Private - Rice/Baylor

State of Cal - 38 million population - 4 P-5 = 9.5 million per P-5
3 G5's = 5.42 million per P/G 5

Public - Cal, UCLA, SDSU, SJ State, Fresno State
Private - Stanford/USC

I can assure you that the State of NC is over-packed with football programs based on the State's size. Florida can probably stand two more P-5's without a huge drop-off.

check again. you forgot UTSA, North Texas, Texas State, & TCU (whom you omitted from P5). SMU is clearly not a public if their name isn't a dead give away and they especially are not a P5 school. they have 5 P5s and 7 G5's.

State of Texas 26 million population - 4 P-5 = 6.5 million per P-5
5 G5's = 2.9 million per P/G 5

Thanks for the reminder. That would make it 5.2 million per P-5, and 2 million per P/G 5, and would seeming place Texas behind Florida on overall population per P 5/ G 5. Maybe someone else will break this down per top 300 - 500 recruits.

California has a huge advantage.

The only other State that I can think of that is swamped from the B 5 - G 5 standpoint is Ohio with 7 G-5's and Ohio State. They would be 1.5 million per B/G 5.

Ohio State must really love the MAC because if you collapsed the programs at Toledo, Arkon, Ohio, Bowling Green, Kent, and Miami into just two or three competitors - say Ohio, Miami, and Cincy, Ohio State might be facing three other state schools with 45-50 seat stadiums instead of 7 small stadiums.
(This post was last modified: 07-11-2014 08:51 PM by lumberpack4.)
07-11-2014 08:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,364
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #162
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

The odds that this changes any time soon are remote
07-11-2014 08:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Melky Cabrera Offline
Bill Bradley
*

Posts: 4,716
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 100
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #163
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

The odds that this changes any time soon are remote

Why? Is this some kind do unwritten rule? It's okay for states with fewr than 3 million population like Mississippi and Iowa to have 2 P5 schools, but it's not okay for states3-4 times their size like Illinois and Pennsylvania to have a third? Unless it's private? Not following the logic here.
07-12-2014 01:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #164
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?
07-12-2014 06:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Knightsweat Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,872
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 123
I Root For: OU & UCF
Location:
Post: #165
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

He doesn't know anything more than you or I. He always comments on a subject in a way that always puts his own school over others, with the state of Texas being a close second.

I'd definitely like to hear from him as to why Texas is so special, and population isn't that reason.
07-12-2014 08:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TodgeRodge Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,945
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
Post: #166
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

contrary to Aggie "logic" the reason it is not a coincidence has nothing to do with athletics or population or recruiting it has to do with academics and the formation of university systems and higher ed in general

in general most states either have one or two "flagship" universities one originally dedicated to humanities, liberal arts, professional programs and the like and another dedicated to ag and "mechanical" studies and any other was a "normal college" for teacher training........some states it was two distinct universities like Michigan and Michigan State or Iowa and Iowa State and some it was one like tOSU, Florida, MN, WI and the like

those were generally the schools that had a full athletics program since the normal colleges enrolled a much larger % of females and female athletics were mostly non-existent

again The State of Iowa is probably the best example of this with Iowa State and Iowa and then UNI which was the "normal college"......those are the only three public universities in the state and UNI only recently because of the growth of the university was allowed to focus on research as well as undergrad studies

others like WI or Nebraska have a single large research state university and all the others were either normal colleges or dedicated to undergrad studies for most of their early history and thus athletics were not developed

in the case of Florida UF is the single university that was originally the flagship and Free Shrimp U was a girls school for 40+ years until after WWII when soldiers returning home started going there

also in most states you have either one BOR for all the universities or you have a BOR for each system.....Iowa has the single BOR system as does Georgia (with the University of Georgia the original "flagship and land grant university" combined into one)

over time as populations grew and cities and regions grew there would be changes in schools and some would be bumped up and called flagships (Free Shrimp as an example).......others would just be elevated to "research" while the single original flagship stayed the same (like UGA the flagship and GaTech, Georgia State, Georgia Regents as research)

states that are notable exceptions to this overall scheme are California, Texas and NY

in the 60s California had "The California Plan" and that merged all state universities into either the UC System or the CSU System........while Cal Berkeley would still the the "flagship" of the UC System all UC System schools are treated equally and California is the only state where all the UC System schools are considered "land grant" (I believe because they run all land grant activity through the system offices not Cal and UC Davis originally a Cal ag research station would be the university that would be the "land grant" university in most other states)....CSU schools do not offer PhDs or Doctorates for the most part with a few exceptions (SDSU) or in conjunction with a UC System school and there are two BORs the UC and the CSU

there was also a de-emphasis on athletics at many of the schools in both systems

in New York Cornell a private university is actually the "land grant" and that portion of the university is actually state funded as are a couple of other portions of the university

all state universities in NY are in the SUNY System and they do not have a flagship they have research, doctoral and on and on and the emphasis on athletics is small overall with only Buffalo a state D1-A school and all under one BOR

in Texas there are 6 university systems (Texas, A&M, Tech, UH, north Texas state, and Texas State)......all but one have a flagship.....the Texas State System that was originally made up of many of the states normal colleges has no flagship and Texas has 4 independent state universities Stephen F. Austin, TWU, TSU and Midwestern......each system has a BOR and each independent has a BOR

even with a flagship for each system some systems have more than one research university, UT Austin, UTD, UTA, UTEP and UTSA as an example and nearly every one of the state universities in Texas has at least a couple of doctorate or PhD programs and athletics emphasis was left up to the universities and BORs

so really the reason that most states have only two state D1-A universities is because at the beginning there was either a Land Grant Ag and Mechanical major university and an Arts, Liberal Arts, Humanities and Professional program university in each state and then normal colleges and in some states there was just the single major state university and then the normal colleges

so the normal colleges never had a focus on athletics and by the time many of them changed to other missions athletics was far enough along that the attempt top put a focus on it was seen as not worth the money and effort or possibly as taking away from the "flagships"

only in a couple of states did things change significantly and that was California that shifted around all universities and changed up athletics dramatically at many of them and took away the power for schools to try and differentiate themselves with athletics and in Texas where pretty much the opposite happened and specific areas were able to get universities for their areas sometimes with their own BOR either through the creation of a university and a system (Texas Tech) or the state taking over a university and allowing it to have it's own BOR (UH).....A&M and UT were never going to merge into one university system and other universities had broken out on their own or started on their own and were not going to merge into another system as well especially the UT, A&M or Texas State Systems

in Florida with a large land area and high population growth and a single university system they were just trying to keep up with educational growth and needs before worrying about athletics

everywhere else is pretty much small enough that trying to let another university compete at the D1-A level was not allowed until it was way too late for that university to compete and compete well enough to become a "P5" member

and there are only a couple of states with private universities that were large enough, had enough money and had a demand for football to maintain being "P5"
07-12-2014 08:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DfromCT Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 223
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Stamford, CT
Post: #167
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
How many "directional Universities" are there in the P5? I'm hard pressed to name one!
07-12-2014 08:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,364
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #168
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
Terrible roadrunner reading comprehension...but there's a reason UTSA lets anyone in.

I never said the reason was because of athletics or population.

I'll give you the rest of your post though, it IS because most states only have two schools that are both their state's flagship public schools AND have a history of playing at the highest level.

Texas is the lone exception because of a fluke of politics that got a non-Flagship school into a power conference.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014 08:52 AM by 10thMountain.)
07-12-2014 08:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TodgeRodge Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,945
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
Post: #169
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 08:42 AM)DfromCT Wrote:  How many "directional Universities" are there in the P5? I'm hard pressed to name one!

USC

after that it again goes back to the fact that directional universities were often normal colleges or undergrad and masters only universities and it was seen as a waste to have a full athletics program at such a school and by the time many of those had outgrown that mission the main "P5" conferences were already in place and the shifts were towards fewer D1-A programs overall and P5 conference realignment
07-12-2014 08:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,364
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #170
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
Quote:How many "directional Universities" are there in the P5? I'm hard pressed to name one!

2 (Southern California and Northwestern)

But you'll notice those are private schools. Privates don't play by the same rules as public schools do.

There are no public P5 directional schools (and schools like University of South Carolina or University of North Carolina don't count because those are their state's name)
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014 09:05 AM by 10thMountain.)
07-12-2014 09:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NestaKnight1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,844
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 99
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #171
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-11-2014 03:48 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 01:41 PM)NestaKnight1 Wrote:  Just for the record professor, according to http://www.theus50.com Texas has 266,874 sq. miles, and Florida has 58,681 sq. miles, therefore Texas is 4.5478775072 times the size of Florida. Close enough to 5x for me chief.

But so what? If you've ever driven through west Texas, you know that VAST amounts of that space are empty. You can drive the 500 miles between San Antonio and El Paso, or the 600 miles between Dallas and El Paso, and barely encounter any signs of civilization.

Population is a better indicator of carrying capacity, and Florida/Texas are in that regard pretty close.

Maybe so, but I was only trying to say Florida has their recruits contained within a smaller area, ie is more concentrated with recruits, has more per sq. mile, anyway you want to say it.
07-12-2014 09:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #172
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 09:04 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  
Quote:How many "directional Universities" are there in the P5? I'm hard pressed to name one!

2 (Southern California and Northwestern)

But you'll notice those are private schools.

Private schools are not 'directional'. The reason that term has a stigma is because among public schools, it implies that the directional school is subordinate to some trans-state flagship. Like the "University of South Alabama" compared to the "University of Alabama".

The only possible P5 directional is UCLA. But, UCLA has been designated a state flagship so it doesn't count either. In short, there are no directional P5s.

But that doesn't mean their can't be.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014 09:44 AM by quo vadis.)
07-12-2014 09:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #173
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 08:32 AM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

contrary to Aggie "logic" the reason it is not a coincidence has nothing to do with athletics or population or recruiting it has to do with academics and the formation of university systems and higher ed in general

You do an excellent job explaining the historical reason for why there are no more than 2 public P5s in any state but Texas, but there is nothing in that explanation that precludes non-flagships from becoming P5s in the future. If directionals like UCF and USF can grow their endowments, brand value, academics, and fan bases to P5-level, and they certainly can, then there is no apparent reason - among those you stated as explanations for the current state of affairs - that they wouldn't be looked on favorably by P5s as having the necessary elements.
07-12-2014 09:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,235
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2445
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #174
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-11-2014 12:12 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I don't think renaming them after cities is any better than being 'directional.'

I agree. But I don't think the names are the real problem anyways.

They aren't. There are actually a lot of non-flagship public schools in the P5 or at least ones that aren't the top public school. Mississippi State, Florida State, OK State, Iowa State, NC State, Virginia Tech, Oregon State, Louisville, Texas Tech, Purdue, etc.

There is no reason why a directional can't become P5, if it develops the underlying institutional and market fundamentals.
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014 09:53 AM by quo vadis.)
07-12-2014 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,364
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #175
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 09:43 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 08:32 AM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

contrary to Aggie "logic" the reason it is not a coincidence has nothing to do with athletics or population or recruiting it has to do with academics and the formation of university systems and higher ed in general

You do an excellent job explaining the historical reason for why there are no more than 2 public P5s in any state but Texas, but there is nothing in that explanation that precludes non-flagships from becoming P5s in the future. If directionals like UCF and USF can grow their endowments, brand value, academics, and fan bases to P5-level, and they certainly can, then there is no apparent reason - among those you stated as explanations for the current state of affairs - that they wouldn't be looked on favorably by P5s as having the necessary elements.

Its not impossible. The Big 12 already has a non-Flagship public school, so they could certainly add another 2 if their needs met. I was more pointing out how very, very rare that would be for a P5 league to do so (its only happened once before and under much different circumstances)
07-12-2014 09:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,364
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #176
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 09:52 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 12:12 PM)Knightsweat Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 12:09 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I don't think renaming them after cities is any better than being 'directional.'

I agree. But I don't think the names are the real problem anyways.

They aren't. There are actually a lot of non-flagship public schools in the P5 or at least ones that aren't the top public school. Mississippi State, Florida State, OK State, Iowa State, NC State, Virginia Tech, Oregon State, Louisville, Texas Tech, Purdue, etc.

There is no reason why a directional can't become P5, if it develops the underlying institutional and market fundamentals.

That depends on your definition of "Flagship" but most of those schools you list qualify as Flagship public schools
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2014 10:05 AM by 10thMountain.)
07-12-2014 09:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #177
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
03-banghead
07-12-2014 10:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bluesox Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,317
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 84
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #178
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
Better move is to merge with the acc. The downside to adding either UCF or USF is it will make a big enemy in the sec + acc since those leagues don't want to pop up USF/UCF.
07-12-2014 10:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TodgeRodge Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,945
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
Post: #179
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 09:43 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 08:32 AM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

contrary to Aggie "logic" the reason it is not a coincidence has nothing to do with athletics or population or recruiting it has to do with academics and the formation of university systems and higher ed in general

You do an excellent job explaining the historical reason for why there are no more than 2 public P5s in any state but Texas, but there is nothing in that explanation that precludes non-flagships from becoming P5s in the future. If directionals like UCF and USF can grow their endowments, brand value, academics, and fan bases to P5-level, and they certainly can, then there is no apparent reason - among those you stated as explanations for the current state of affairs - that they wouldn't be looked on favorably by P5s as having the necessary elements.

with the notable exception that "P5" conferences and schools are not really looking to move programs up or to help them move up and no current P5 conference has a need for any new programs especially ones based around "potential"
07-12-2014 10:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TodgeRodge Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,945
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
Post: #180
RE: More Thoughts About B12 Adding UCF/USF
(07-12-2014 09:57 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 09:43 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 08:32 AM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  
(07-12-2014 06:45 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(07-11-2014 08:52 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Again, Texas is the only state with more than 2 public P5s

Nobody else has more than 2 and it's not a coincidence

You keep saying this, but why isn't it a coincidence?

contrary to Aggie "logic" the reason it is not a coincidence has nothing to do with athletics or population or recruiting it has to do with academics and the formation of university systems and higher ed in general

You do an excellent job explaining the historical reason for why there are no more than 2 public P5s in any state but Texas, but there is nothing in that explanation that precludes non-flagships from becoming P5s in the future. If directionals like UCF and USF can grow their endowments, brand value, academics, and fan bases to P5-level, and they certainly can, then there is no apparent reason - among those you stated as explanations for the current state of affairs - that they wouldn't be looked on favorably by P5s as having the necessary elements.

Its not impossible. The Big 12 already has a non-Flagship public school, so they could certainly add another 2 if their needs met. I was more pointing out how very, very rare that would be for a P5 league to do so (its only happened once before and under much different circumstances)

all of the public schools in the Big 12 are flagship universities and always have been
07-12-2014 10:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.