(07-28-2015 09:43 AM)UCF08 Wrote: I won't argue against that, but you're sort of sidestepping the question with that response. Why do children born on the other side of the tracks have such different outcomes than those born on the right side of the tracks?
If they are born on the wrong side of the tracks, then most likely mom and dad live on the wrong side of the tracks, and the reasons why mom and dad live there probably have a huge influence on junior.
There could be many reasons--racism is surely one, others include IQ, education, ambition, the "welfare trap," you can probably come up with others. What we need to try to do is to break that cycle as much as possible.
I can't attribute motives to the democrats because I can't crawl inside their heads. But I can say that if they were going to design a welfare policy with the specific intent of keeping the poor trapped in poverty, this is what they'd come up with. And yes, I think that has a lot to do with why children born on the wrong side of the tracks grow up to live on the wrong side of the tracks.
Unfortunately, republicans can't seem to come up with a grip on how to address this problem. Individual republicans--Jack Kemp and Rand Paul among them--have addressed this issue and have come up with good ideas, but the party as a whole can't come up with a compelling message on this issue.
So you have one party that knows it has a large captive voting bloc as long as the poor remain dumb, poor, and voting democrat, and so they implement policies to accomplish that, and another party that can't seem to come to grips with the problem or any solution to that. On this issue at least, it really is evil party versus stupid party. And if that analysis offends anybody, then good, if you are in a position to be offended by anything I said here, you need offending.