(12-07-2015 06:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Drinks have that machine they have to breathe in.

Those are for habitual offenders...are they the only drunks killing people with cars?

But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(12-07-2015 07:09 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 06:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Drinks have that machine they have to breathe in.

Those are for habitual offenders...are they the only drunks killing people with cars?

No, but we can set up trigger locks for habitual mass murdering terrorists!

Makes perfect sense.

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Yep, follow the money. Always. Cardfan (I think) been saying the same thing. The "well dressed men" coming an going over the past several weeks. A shiny, new Lexus for granma to zip it up, boxes of ammo, explosives, whatever else, yet they live in a crappy, cramped townhouse of some sort.

But it's clearly about some old guy in a bad blue shirt and apparently his 34 "accomplices". Some of you really need to get a grip.

(12-07-2015 07:09 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 06:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Drinks have that machine they have to breathe in.

Those are for habitual offenders...are they the only drunks killing people with cars?

In Texas you have to have them installed in your vehicle as a condition of your Bond in some Courts, even on first offense before Trial.

(12-07-2015 06:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 03:45 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 03:33 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 06:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  My theory. He was part of a cell that was planning something bigger. He got pissed off at somebody in the office and went off the ranch. Just a guess. The rest of his cell is probably mega-pissed.

Interesting...that would make it partially work place violence then.

It's certainly possible.

I just wish both sides would wait more than 5 minutes before trying to stake a position on what actually happened and why.

Give me a break, Tom... The overwhelming majority of us all waited quite a very long time before staking a position on what actually happened and why...

And he jumped right back in to water carrying mode based on a theory. Hence the mega facepalm. The facts slap him in the face and he still grasps to the alternative.

Stop assuming stuff about me just because I'm liberal. You're wrong in your assumptions here.

Not just a liberal - an extremely slump shouldered one at that due to all the water toting you do. Truly, an Obama groupie!!

(12-07-2015 06:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Drinks have that machine they have to breathe in.

But that's after a crime has been committed. Not when you have a clean driving record.

Paris is proof that attacks like *this* one can not be prevented by laws restricting weapons.

In a way I'm very relieved that these weapons were legally obtained under the strictest gun laws in the nation. We can start to talk about the problem of violence and not the tools used for it.

A question I have not seen answered from the progressives is *what laws would have prevented this particular event*.

(12-07-2015 03:25 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 06:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  My theory. He was part of a cell that was planning something bigger. He got pissed off at somebody in the office and went off the ranch. Just a guess. The rest of his cell is probably mega-pissed.

Interesting...that would make it partially work place violence then.

It's certainly possible.

I just wish both sides would wait more than 5 minutes before trying to stake a position on what actually happened and why.

Yeah, typical RogaineTom nonsense.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(12-07-2015 05:56 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Feds very interested in Farook's Mosque based upon Transponder activity of surveilence aircraft.

http://theaviationist.com/2015/12/05/fbi...no-attack/

This is exactly what I'm talking about on the "Trump, deport Muslims" thread. The extremists need to gtfo.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

(12-08-2015 11:03 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

but RWT will still call it workplace violence... contrary to fact.

(12-08-2015 10:57 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 05:56 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Feds very interested in Farook's Mosque based upon Transponder activity of surveilence aircraft.

http://theaviationist.com/2015/12/05/fbi...no-attack/

This is exactly what I'm talking about on the "Trump, deport Muslims" thread. The extremists need to gtfo.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Outstanding FBI work buzzing the Mosque. Needs to be done in a lot of places. It's free air space so do it. If They have nothing to hide from the Feds then it shouldn't be a problem. Monitoring Airwaves for Cellphone calls from a mosque to Middle eastern countries should not be a problem. If They are in the United States, Why would They ever need to contact any middle East country. What are They communicating about anyway. The individuals can use Their own cellphones for those calls. That way there is a record of a contact incase of an incident .

(12-08-2015 12:22 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:03 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

but RWT will still call it workplace violence... contrary to fact.

Do you purposely try to be wrong? You sure do it well.

Some uncomfortable truths for you:
1. I never said it was workplace violence.
2. I don't think it was workplace violence.
3. I am surprised the Owl numbers even remotely feels that it was partially workplace violence at all.

Now, carry on with you continual incorrect assumptions about what I believe.

(12-07-2015 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 06:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  My theory. He was part of a cell that was planning something bigger. He got pissed off at somebody in the office and went off the ranch. Just a guess. The rest of his cell is probably mega-pissed.

Interesting...that would make it partially work place violence then.

It's certainly possible.

I just wish both sides would wait more than 5 minutes before trying to stake a position on what actually happened and why.

(12-08-2015 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 12:22 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:03 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

but RWT will still call it workplace violence... contrary to fact.

Do you purposely try to be wrong? You sure do it well.

Some uncomfortable truths for you:
1. I never said it was workplace violence.
2. I don't think it was workplace violence.
3. I am surprised the Owl numbers even remotely feels that it was partially workplace violence at all.

Now, carry on with you continual incorrect assumptions about what I believe.

You should really remember what you type...

(12-08-2015 01:26 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 06:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  My theory. He was part of a cell that was planning something bigger. He got pissed off at somebody in the office and went off the ranch. Just a guess. The rest of his cell is probably mega-pissed.

Interesting...that would make it partially work place violence then.

It's certainly possible.

I just wish both sides would wait more than 5 minutes before trying to stake a position on what actually happened and why.

(12-08-2015 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 12:22 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:03 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 07:17 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  But it must be that workplace violence...

"Bank records show $28,500 deposit to Syed Farook's account two weeks before the shooting, source says"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/...-says.html


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

but RWT will still call it workplace violence... contrary to fact.

Do you purposely try to be wrong? You sure do it well.

Some uncomfortable truths for you:
1. I never said it was workplace violence.
2. I don't think it was workplace violence.
3. I am surprised the Owl numbers even remotely feels that it was partially workplace violence at all.

Now, carry on with you continual incorrect assumptions about what I believe.

You should really remember what you type...

Dude...I'm quantifying Owl numbers response...it's not and never has been my opinion.

And enough with the coffee cup smilie, mmmkay?

(12-08-2015 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 01:26 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-07-2015 10:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 06:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  My theory. He was part of a cell that was planning something bigger. He got pissed off at somebody in the office and went off the ranch. Just a guess. The rest of his cell is probably mega-pissed.

Interesting...that would make it partially work place violence then.

It's certainly possible.

I just wish both sides would wait more than 5 minutes before trying to stake a position on what actually happened and why.

(12-08-2015 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 12:22 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 11:03 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  This should be easy to trace as recent laws have made the "off shore" banks more responsive lest they lose the opportunity to operate legally in the USA.

Even the gnomes of Zurich have been convinced to cooperate.

but RWT will still call it workplace violence... contrary to fact.

Do you purposely try to be wrong? You sure do it well.

Some uncomfortable truths for you:
1. I never said it was workplace violence.
2. I don't think it was workplace violence.
3. I am surprised the Owl numbers even remotely feels that it was partially workplace violence at all.

Now, carry on with you continual incorrect assumptions about what I believe.

You should really remember what you type...

Dude...I'm quantifying Owl numbers response...it's not and never has been my opinion.

And enough with the coffee cup smilie, mmmkay?

If you were quantifying his response, then you were thinking it was workplace violence...

and now you want to ***** about the smilies because you got caught in a lie and have nothing else to rebuttal with.

See if you can follow:

Owl posted a theory.
I posted that if that theory was true it would make it partially workplace violence.
His theory can in no way be proven since the shooter is dead.
So no way a workplace violence conclusion can be reached.

I only posted what I did because I was shocked that someone like Owl would reach this conclusion based on his normal positions on things.

That's it. It's not my position now or then. Move along.

(12-08-2015 04:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  See if you can follow:

Owl posted a theory.
I posted that if that theory was true it would make it partially workplace violence.
His theory can in no way be proven since the shooter is dead.
So no way a workplace violence conclusion can be reached.

I only posted what I did because I was shocked that someone like Owl would reach this conclusion based on his normal positions on things.

That's it. It's not my position now or then. Move along.

I see you are trying to backtrack...

I could be wrong, but I think Owl's position was that it was violence associated with the workplace... hence 'workplace violence'... but not that it was related to frustration at his job.