Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Poll: Who should Aresco add?
Army/Air Force
BYU/Boise
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
Author Message
MrCincy Offline
Banned

Posts: 135
Joined: Dec 2015
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
I think the AAC should add 4 teams. Add to the East Div.: Army and UMass and add to the West Div.: Air Force & Colorado State.
10-16-2016 11:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PurpleReigns Offline
I AM...PURPLE AND GOLD!
*

Posts: 17,842
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 230
I Root For: ECU
Location: ENC
Post: #22
Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
AF, CSU, Army, and one more (Southern Miss maybe if BYU isn't an option) should be the only realistic options if the B12 does nothing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
10-16-2016 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fanhood Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,593
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 71
I Root For: San Diego State
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 11:03 AM)MrCincy Wrote:  I think the AAC should add 4 teams. Add to the East Div.: Army and UMass and add to the West Div.: Air Force & Colorado State.

Army and UMASS are real possibilities. However, there is no upside for CSU and Air Force to join the AAC. See my previous post.

Now of ESPN/FOX/CBS or whoever assured all teams of $5 million a year, that would be a different story. There is just no indication of this being a reality.
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016 11:17 AM by fanhood.)
10-16-2016 11:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #24
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
Lol they aint comin for chump change

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app
10-16-2016 11:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MrCincy Offline
Banned

Posts: 135
Joined: Dec 2015
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 11:23 AM)Stookey57 Wrote:  Lol they aint comin for chump change

Sent from my LG-D851 using CSNbbs mobile app
New TV contract up in 1 yr. Maybe by adding ( Army, UMass, Air Force, & Colorado State (Denver TV market) the AAC could obtain a few more bucks. It also makes a great FB & BB conference with some stability for the future. Who knows, wishful thinking is fun. It also adds some good Geo. rivalry games.
10-16-2016 11:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PurpleReigns Offline
I AM...PURPLE AND GOLD!
*

Posts: 17,842
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 230
I Root For: ECU
Location: ENC
Post: #26
Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
(10-16-2016 11:16 AM)fanhood Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 11:03 AM)MrCincy Wrote:  I think the AAC should add 4 teams. Add to the East Div.: Army and UMass and add to the West Div.: Air Force & Colorado State.

Army and UMASS are real possibilities. However, there is no upside for CSU and Air Force to join the AAC. See my previous post.

Now of ESPN/FOX/CBS or whoever assured all teams of $5 million a year, that would be a different story. There is just no indication of this being a reality.

Upside for CSU/AF: All 3 academies, Denver market, state of Colorado, built in rivalry, ability to move Memphis to the East where they need to be.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
10-16-2016 11:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AusTxPony Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,714
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 67
I Root For: SMU
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
Only Army and BYU (both football only) make any sense financially for us. We do not want to follow the CUSA model and add bad teams just because we can. I would still love to add Wichita for BBall and Olympic Sports.
10-16-2016 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
connecticutguy Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 255
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
Add Army, Air Force, Rice and BYU
10-16-2016 12:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PurpleReigns Offline
I AM...PURPLE AND GOLD!
*

Posts: 17,842
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 230
I Root For: ECU
Location: ENC
Post: #29
Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
(10-16-2016 11:44 AM)AusTxPony Wrote:  Only Army and BYU (both football only) make any sense financially for us. We do not want to follow the CUSA model and add bad teams just because we can. I would still love to add Wichita for BBall and Olympic Sports.

Air Force is a bad team? CSU isn't half bad either and AF would want to bring them along.

USM has finally shed their winless season and is looking mighty good plus they have a history with most of us.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
10-16-2016 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #30
Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract neg...
(10-16-2016 10:23 AM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Is like Boobies

Exactly! This thread is so over done that a reply of boobies says it all.
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016 01:15 PM by Westhoff123.)
10-16-2016 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Offline
The Black Knight of The Deplorables

Posts: 9,618
Joined: Oct 2013
I Root For: Army, SFU
Location: Michie Stadium 1945
Post: #31
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract negotiation
BYU is satisfied with their current position.

Army is staying independent until it is no longer allowed.
10-16-2016 01:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fishpro1098 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,846
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 137
I Root For: Temple
Location: Eugene, OR
Post: #32
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 01:14 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 10:23 AM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Is like Boobies

Exactly! This thread is so over done that a reply of boobies says it all.

Sorry, but a picture is worth a thousand words.


.
10-16-2016 02:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigHouston Offline
STRONG
*

Posts: 12,203
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 362
I Root For: HOUSTON, USC Trojans
Location: Houston Tx
Post: #33
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 08:42 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  I don't think he needs to add anyone. The current TV deal was made with AAC at the bottom of the barrel. The new deal will get a bump if we stay intact. It is looking more and more like that will happen.

You nailed it goodknightfl

We all know do to instability the AAC was given an embarrassing crappy peanut crumbs for the birds tv deal.

You right goodknightfl, if the AAC remains intact there's no reason at all this league should get a deserving $$$ bump.

That said, I don't think we should add anyone... Hell, if the AAC decided to go after someone Wichita State to offset Navy would be my only choice.

Leave the western (mwc) teams in their island, the AAC doesn't need any of them.
10-16-2016 02:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
acc4life Offline
Banned

Posts: 806
Joined: Jul 2016
I Root For: Yo Momma
Location: Next door to Carmen
Post: #34
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 07:22 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:42 AM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:36 AM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:31 AM)acc4life Wrote:  [quote='fishpro1098' pid='13684932' dateline='1476601761']

Give it a rest. No one is going any where until:

A. The Big 12 decides what it is doing.
B. The AAC contract period is closer to a year from ending.

Enjoy the AAC games this year. The league is tight. On any given Saturday...


.


The Big 12 isn't going to do anything, because the money is not materializing; this is exactly why Aresco needs to add 2 teams that bring value before the contract renegotiation, otherwise we will end up with a reduced TV contract like CUSA. If you think being an ostrich and burying your head in the sand like the Big 12 is a good move (rather than being proactive), say hello to the Dodo for me.

You can wish all you want, none of those teams have a compelling reason to leave their existing situations. The money is not there.


.


Actually, BYU doesn't get that much for their home games and they have no shot at an access bowl, outside of going undefeated and making the playoff (fat chance). Additionally, the MWC TV contract is worth less than the AAC's and offers way less coverage.


You're wrong on both accounts but you do what makes you feel good.

I'm actually right about both, moron; the American's contract is worth $2.5 million a year, while the MW is worth $1.64 million. http://www.mwcconnection.com/mountain-we...er-schools
10-16-2016 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
acc4life Offline
Banned

Posts: 806
Joined: Jul 2016
I Root For: Yo Momma
Location: Next door to Carmen
Post: #35
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 01:14 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 10:23 AM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Is like Boobies

Exactly! This thread is so over done that a reply of boobies says it all.


Problem is, you like...

[Image: chickens-henhouse-herd-domestic-birds-ba...424536.jpg]
10-16-2016 04:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #36
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 02:47 AM)Savacool Wrote:  Did you mean Boise State? We do not want them in the AAC in my humble opinion. Their program has gone downhill fast. I cannot watch a game on a blue playing field! Bring on BYU,Army,Air Force or even Colorado State.

Yeah bsu has gone downhill lol. They turned down this conference because of TooLame taking sdsu with them. Umass, niu etc will be the pool of teams added to the AAC if anyone. It's a shame the AAC couldn't add any more mwc teams and settled on more cusa schools. It killed the perception of a best of the rest conference.
10-16-2016 04:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #37
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 04:09 PM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 07:22 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:42 AM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:36 AM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:31 AM)acc4life Wrote:  [quote='fishpro1098' pid='13684932' dateline='1476601761']

Give it a rest. No one is going any where until:

A. The Big 12 decides what it is doing.
B. The AAC contract period is closer to a year from ending.

Enjoy the AAC games this year. The league is tight. On any given Saturday...


.


The Big 12 isn't going to do anything, because the money is not materializing; this is exactly why Aresco needs to add 2 teams that bring value before the contract renegotiation, otherwise we will end up with a reduced TV contract like CUSA. If you think being an ostrich and burying your head in the sand like the Big 12 is a good move (rather than being proactive), say hello to the Dodo for me.

You can wish all you want, none of those teams have a compelling reason to leave their existing situations. The money is not there.


.


Actually, BYU doesn't get that much for their home games and they have no shot at an access bowl, outside of going undefeated and making the playoff (fat chance). Additionally, the MWC TV contract is worth less than the AAC's and offers way less coverage.


You're wrong on both accounts but you do what makes you feel good.

I'm actually right about both, moron; the American's contract is worth $2.5 million a year, while the MW is worth $1.64 million. http://www.mwcconnection.com/mountain-we...er-schools

Does that include the bonus money distributed by boise's ESPN deal? For instance Wyoming got around 1 million in bonus money the last 2 years for a total of over 2.5 a year the AAC makes.
10-16-2016 04:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
acc4life Offline
Banned

Posts: 806
Joined: Jul 2016
I Root For: Yo Momma
Location: Next door to Carmen
Post: #38
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 04:17 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:47 AM)Savacool Wrote:  Did you mean Boise State? We do not want them in the AAC in my humble opinion. Their program has gone downhill fast. I cannot watch a game on a blue playing field! Bring on BYU,Army,Air Force or even Colorado State.

Yeah bsu has gone downhill lol. They turned down this conference because of TooLame taking sdsu with them. Umass, niu etc will be the pool of teams added to the AAC if anyone. It's a shame the AAC couldn't add any more mwc teams and settled on more cusa schools. It killed the perception of a best of the rest conference.


No, it didn't; every talking head on TV agrees that the AAC is the best G5 conference. We already have a scheduling agreement with BYU and if Aresco can get a network to guarantee, let's say 10 million, if two of the four aforementioned schools come aboard, it could happen.
10-16-2016 04:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #39
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 04:26 PM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 04:17 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:47 AM)Savacool Wrote:  Did you mean Boise State? We do not want them in the AAC in my humble opinion. Their program has gone downhill fast. I cannot watch a game on a blue playing field! Bring on BYU,Army,Air Force or even Colorado State.

Yeah bsu has gone downhill lol. They turned down this conference because of TooLame taking sdsu with them. Umass, niu etc will be the pool of teams added to the AAC if anyone. It's a shame the AAC couldn't add any more mwc teams and settled on more cusa schools. It killed the perception of a best of the rest conference.


No, it didn't; every talking head on TV agrees that the AAC is the best G5 conference. We already have a scheduling agreement with BYU and if Aresco can get a network to guarantee, let's say 10 million, if two of the four aforementioned schools come aboard, it could happen.

You think a scheduling agreement with byu is special lol. Byu is a de facto member of the mwc with how many games they play against mwc. And how did bsu get the access bowl out in 2014? Why are the tv deals so similar? The mwc has been the best G5 leage for so long it's nice to have some competition. This leage ain't getting 10 million a year or 5. Why would they?
10-16-2016 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
acc4life Offline
Banned

Posts: 806
Joined: Jul 2016
I Root For: Yo Momma
Location: Next door to Carmen
Post: #40
RE: Aresco needs 2 add Army/Air Force &/or BYU/Boise before the next contract nego...
(10-16-2016 04:23 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 04:09 PM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 07:22 AM)BamaScorpio69 Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:42 AM)acc4life Wrote:  
(10-16-2016 02:36 AM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  The Big 12 isn't going to do anything, because the money is not materializing; this is exactly why Aresco needs to add 2 teams that bring value before the contract renegotiation, otherwise we will end up with a reduced TV contract like CUSA. If you think being an ostrich and burying your head in the sand like the Big 12 is a good move (rather than being proactive), say hello to the Dodo for me.

You can wish all you want, none of those teams have a compelling reason to leave their existing situations. The money is not there.


.


Actually, BYU doesn't get that much for their home games and they have no shot at an access bowl, outside of going undefeated and making the playoff (fat chance). Additionally, the MWC TV contract is worth less than the AAC's and offers way less coverage.


You're wrong on both accounts but you do what makes you feel good.

I'm actually right about both, moron; the American's contract is worth $2.5 million a year, while the MW is worth $1.64 million. http://www.mwcconnection.com/mountain-we...er-schools

Does that include the bonus money distributed by boise's ESPN deal? For instance Wyoming got around 1 million in bonus money the last 2 years for a total of over 2.5 a year the AAC makes.

No, it doesn't, but some teams in the MWC only got 300k in bonus money; so yes, when Boise wins a NY6 bowl, of course they will make more than the average AAC team, because of the uneven distribution. However, when an AAC team wins the NY6, it's distributed evenly and all AAC teams come out ahead of MWC teams; add in the NCAA tournament BBall units and the AAC kicks the MWC monetarily year in, year out.
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016 04:42 PM by acc4life.)
10-16-2016 04:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.