quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 02:01 PM)MplsBison Wrote: (12-14-2016 01:53 PM)quo vadis Wrote: You can keep posting forever
You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".
You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that your CFP prediction re Navy was proven decisively as dead wrong.
|
|
12-14-2016 07:29 PM |
|
MplsBison
Banned
Posts: 16,648
Joined: Dec 2014
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 07:29 PM)quo vadis Wrote: You can keep posting forever
You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".
|
|
12-14-2016 07:32 PM |
|
toddjnsn
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,553
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 154
I Root For: WMU, MAC
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
|
RE: G5 Access Race
Quote:Only way there would've been proof would've been if Navy had won out. Then we would've seen who was right. But that was all wiped out.
Dude, you're extremely irrational. Read what I wrote. I never claimed Proof. Only you have. You have none. End of story.
|
|
12-14-2016 10:38 PM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 07:32 PM)MplsBison Wrote: (12-14-2016 07:29 PM)quo vadis Wrote: You can keep posting forever
You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".
You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that your CFP prediction re Navy was proven decisively as dead wrong.
|
|
12-15-2016 08:52 AM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 12:47 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 01:01 AM)stever20 Wrote: dude when Navy lost, everything went out the door.
The only thing that went out the door was your DUMB prediction about the CFP and Navy.
Next time, adopt a humble attitude, recognize that others understood how the CFP viewed Navy much better than you, and keep quiet.
You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
|
|
12-15-2016 08:53 AM |
|
stever20
Legend
Posts: 46,405
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 12:47 PM)quo vadis Wrote: The only thing that went out the door was your DUMB prediction about the CFP and Navy.
Next time, adopt a humble attitude, recognize that others understood how the CFP viewed Navy much better than you, and keep quiet.
You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.
What's amazing about this is WMU fans are FAR more rational about it than a "supposed" fan of an AAC school. You should WANT the committee to love the AAC.
|
|
12-15-2016 09:34 AM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote: (12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote: You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.
Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.
Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again.
|
|
12-15-2016 09:47 AM |
|
stever20
Legend
Posts: 46,405
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:47 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote: (12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote: You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.
Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.
Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again.
Dude not a damn thing was proven. You are the dumb ass for thinking that anything was proven. You may think you know what would have happened had Navy won out, but you do not know that for a fact.
|
|
12-15-2016 09:54 AM |
|
quo vadis
Legend
Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:54 AM)stever20 Wrote: (12-15-2016 09:47 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote: (12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote: You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.
You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.
Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.
Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.
That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.
But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.
The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.
Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.
Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.
Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again.
Dude not a damn thing was proven.
Your denial is breathtaking. You were dead wrong and refuse to admit it. You badly overestimated how good Navy was, and how good the CFP thought they were, and how good the CFP thought the AAC was, and that led to your wrong prediction.
Very sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future.
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2016 10:02 AM by quo vadis.)
|
|
12-15-2016 10:01 AM |
|
ken d
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17,454
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1226
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
|
RE: G5 Access Race
Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.
|
|
12-15-2016 10:07 AM |
|
stever20
Legend
Posts: 46,405
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 10:07 AM)ken d Wrote: Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.
It's been time to bury this thread.
|
|
12-15-2016 10:14 AM |
|
fishpro1098
All American
Posts: 2,846
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 137
I Root For: Temple
Location: Eugene, OR
|
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 10:07 AM)ken d Wrote: Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.
No, I would just re-name it tit v. tat.
.
|
|
12-15-2016 12:59 PM |
|
Sultan of Euphonistan
All American
Posts: 4,999
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 80
I Root For: Baritones
Location: The Euphonistan Tree
|
RE: G5 Access Race
Bury it so rocks fall everybody dies?
|
|
12-15-2016 09:19 PM |
|