Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
G5 Access Race
Author Message
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,012
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #961
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 02:01 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 01:53 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  You can keep posting forever

You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".

You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that your CFP prediction re Navy was proven decisively as dead wrong. 07-coffee3
12-14-2016 07:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MplsBison Offline
Banned

Posts: 16,648
Joined: Dec 2014
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
Post: #962
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 07:29 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  You can keep posting forever

You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".
12-14-2016 07:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
toddjnsn Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,553
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 154
I Root For: WMU, MAC
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Post: #963
RE: G5 Access Race
Quote:Only way there would've been proof would've been if Navy had won out. Then we would've seen who was right. But that was all wiped out.

Dude, you're extremely irrational. Read what I wrote. I never claimed Proof. Only you have. You have none. End of story.
12-14-2016 10:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,012
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #964
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 07:32 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 07:29 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  You can keep posting forever

You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that Navy losing means that neither side was "proven" or "disproven".

You can keep posting forever, it won't change the fact that your CFP prediction re Navy was proven decisively as dead wrong. 07-coffee3
12-15-2016 08:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,012
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #965
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 12:47 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 01:01 AM)stever20 Wrote:  dude when Navy lost, everything went out the door.

The only thing that went out the door was your DUMB prediction about the CFP and Navy.

Next time, adopt a humble attitude, recognize that others understood how the CFP viewed Navy much better than you, and keep quiet. 07-coffee3

You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.
12-15-2016 08:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 46,227
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 725
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #966
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 12:47 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  The only thing that went out the door was your DUMB prediction about the CFP and Navy.

Next time, adopt a humble attitude, recognize that others understood how the CFP viewed Navy much better than you, and keep quiet. 07-coffee3

You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.

What's amazing about this is WMU fans are FAR more rational about it than a "supposed" fan of an AAC school. You should WANT the committee to love the AAC.
12-15-2016 09:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,012
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #967
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 01:25 PM)stever20 Wrote:  You have NO ******* clue how the CFP viewed Navy.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.

Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.

Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again. 07-coffee3
12-15-2016 09:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 46,227
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 725
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #968
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:47 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:00 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.

Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.

Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again. 07-coffee3

Dude not a damn thing was proven. You are the dumb ass for thinking that anything was proven. You may think you know what would have happened had Navy won out, but you do not know that for a fact.
12-15-2016 09:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,012
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2372
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #969
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 09:54 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 09:47 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 09:34 AM)stever20 Wrote:  
(12-15-2016 08:53 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-14-2016 02:05 PM)stever20 Wrote:  You have NO clue what the CFP would have done had Navy beaten Temple and Army.

You and Bison were the clueless ones. The CFP? They gave us plenty of clues. Was 2-loss Navy ever ranked ahead of WMU? No, they weren't.

Were any 2-loss G5 ever ranked ahead of WMU? Yep, Houston.

Was Navy anything like Houston? Nope, Navy played a soft OOC schedule and performed poorly against it, Houston had a mighty OOC schedule and dominated two top-10 P5 powers.

That's really all you needed to know to correctly surmise that Navy was never going to get past WMU so long as WMU didn't lose.

But like Bison, you vastly overestimated the AAC, and so pontificated otherwise, and were proven completely wrong.

The rest of us correctly surmised that Navy's weak OOC performance indicated they weren't that good and that the CFP could see it too. Navy losing to Temple and Army proved they were pretenders all along.

Us and the CFP saw eye to eye. You were wrong about how good Navy was, and that caused you to make wrong inferences about the CFP, who like us, was smarter than you.

sorry but you have no clue if Navy had won out if they would or would not go.

Sorry, but you were proven to be clueless, and dead wrong, about what the committee would do with WMU and Navy.

Next time, adopt a humble attitude towards those, like me, with better insight into CFP thinking. Don't repeat your dumb mistake again. 07-coffee3

Dude not a damn thing was proven.

Your denial is breathtaking. You were dead wrong and refuse to admit it. You badly overestimated how good Navy was, and how good the CFP thought they were, and how good the CFP thought the AAC was, and that led to your wrong prediction.

Very sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future. 07-coffee3
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2016 10:02 AM by quo vadis.)
12-15-2016 10:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,335
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1211
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #970
RE: G5 Access Race
Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.
12-15-2016 10:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 46,227
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 725
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #971
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 10:07 AM)ken d Wrote:  Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.

It's been time to bury this thread.
12-15-2016 10:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
fishpro1098 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,846
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 137
I Root For: Temple
Location: Eugene, OR
Post: #972
RE: G5 Access Race
(12-15-2016 10:07 AM)ken d Wrote:  Sounds like it's time to bury this thread.

No, I would just re-name it tit v. tat.



.
12-15-2016 12:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Sultan of Euphonistan Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,999
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 80
I Root For: Baritones
Location: The Euphonistan Tree
Post: #973
RE: G5 Access Race
Bury it so rocks fall everybody dies?
12-15-2016 09:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.