RE: WKU Attendance Thread
Read over the 10 pages of comments, here's a general response.
For WKU, I've never thought about it before, but I can definitely see how Kentucky would be a "basketball state." No NFL team. For years, the only P5 team was UK, who is one of the best in bball but horrid at football. UL is also good at bball, but their recent national football success hasn't been a thing for that long, has it? WKU wasn't an FBS team until roughly 10 years ago. Sounds like the state of sports in Kentucky is vastly different from what I'm used to in LA. Between the Saints, Cowboys, and LSew, we're definitely a football state (look at the Pelicans and tell me otherwise).
FWIW, in 2014 the Louisiana Tech Band of Pride went to Marshall because C-USA paid for it. They did not pay for it this time, so they couldn't afford to go. (although I do appreciate hearing our fight song over the loudspeakers every time we scored).
Southern Miss did bring more fans to WKU last year, but then again Southern Miss had just won the west with a huge win over a rival and felt like they were back. This year, Tech had just lost and morale was down. I don't recall the feelings going into WKU-USM last year, but no one was giving us a chance after the Southern Miss game. Not many people would want to travel that far for a game if you don't think you'll win.
As for comparing our title game to the MAC, the MAC is way more compact than C-USA. Buffalo is the one outlier, and they are still closer to Indy than Ruston is to Bowling Green. Now imagine UTEP vs ODU, hypothetically. The MAC will have better numbers at their game because those teams are all close together.
As for the neutral site argument, again, the MAC schools are all pretty close, so driving to Indy isn't terrible. C-USA? Way too spread out, and if we can't get a strong crowd from a team to a home game, it's gonna be worse at a neutral site.
And where would that neutral site be? Over my dead body would it be in Birmingham. UAB already gets to host the bball tourney every year (which is bullcrap in and of itself), no way they should get to host the football title game, ESPECIALLY if they're in it. Where else, then? Can't do Atlanta, the SEC already claimed it (anyone know what's happening to the Georgia Dome once the Falcons finish their "we ripped off the Saints' sponsor" Stadium? Could SEC use one and C-USA the other?) Anywhere else would be too much towards one division or the other. Hell, even Pac-12 fans don't like there title game at a neutral site and want it brought back to campuses, and attendance is the primary reason.
|