http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/us/pol....html?_r=0


Positive point about Trump's appointees. People who have actively opposed Obama's policies. NYT article, surprisingly, isn't hysterical, but is actually factual.

There's a guy on another forum I frequent, a Gary Johson supporter, who's trying to hard to convince those of us who supported Trump that he's stabbing us in the back....saying stupid shyte like we thought we were electing a conservative.

I've said here, and there, many times that Trump has a history of being more liberal than Hillary, but even at that, I still wouldn't have voted for her.

As for Trump's true convictions, I don't give a rat's ass as long as he keeps making appointments like those discussed in your linked article. Most importantly for me will be his appointments to the Supremes.

Thanks for the article. I've posted it at the other site as well.

(12-06-2016 08:56 AM)bullet Wrote:  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/us/pol....html?_r=0


Positive point about Trump's appointees. People who have actively opposed Obama's policies. NYT article, surprisingly, isn't hysterical, but is actually factual.

It'll prove that you can't expect to do the same things over and over and expect different results. This people know money and defense as that's their lives. Oblunder would appoint lackeys and sycophants without expecting anyone to go against him.

(12-06-2016 03:06 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  There's a guy on another forum I frequent, a Gary Johson supporter, who's trying to hard to convince those of us who supported Trump that he's stabbing us in the back....saying stupid shyte like we thought we were electing a conservative.

I've said here, and there, many times that Trump has a history of being more liberal than Hillary, but even at that, I still wouldn't have voted for her.

As for Trump's true convictions, I don't give a rat's ass as long as he keeps making appointments like those discussed in your linked article. Most importantly for me will be his appointments to the Supremes.

Thanks for the article. I've posted it at the other site as well.

What I said when someone asked if if I had to vote for one of the two major parties...

"The damage that trump would do is probably going to be less long term than the damage Hillary would do."