(12-08-2016 12:33 PM)Fitbud Wrote: I seem to recall that one Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch were seen speaking on the tarmac and that was enough to confirm for many on this forum that the fix was in on Hillary's investigation.
However, now Ivanka Trump closes a deal with Japan at the same time that she sits in a meeting with the Prime Minister and it's "nothing to see here"?
Come on man. Be consistent.
I am. The connection between Loretta Lynch and the FBI was established, as was the connection between Bill and Hillary Clinton. So too was the connection between the FBI and the investigation into Hillary and her server.
That's a clear conflict of interest. It doesn't help that the excuse given for the meeting (to talk about the kids and yoga) was the same excuse for why emails were deleted from the server... but THAT is a mere inference.
No connection has been established between the PM of Japan and the private company. One has been alleged, but only on the basis of 'I was told'. No evidence nor reasonable link has been provided... and plenty of logical inferences (such as a bank RARELY IF EVER holds 'equity' in an unrelated company) have been presented.
Let me help you on that part. Banks are based on leverage of equity. If a bank holds stock in a company, the capital used to pay for that stock is generally reserved at 1:1, meaning that a stock investment ties up as much equity as the value of the investment. $1mm invested means $1mm that can't be leveraged elsewhere. Depending on what type of loan the bank makes, that $1mm in equity can be used to make as much as $500 in loans... or perhaps even more. The ROI on $500mm in loans is generally going to be a multiple of the ROI of $1mm in a 75 year old clothing manufacturer.
Unless you're saying that because the director of the FBI worked 'at the pleasure of' the President, that for Bill OR Hillary, even in her capacity of SOS (like Ivanka has with Trump's transition) to meet with Obama was a conflict of interest?
Be consistent, man.
