(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

(06-14-2017 09:13 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  This thread went to **** in 0.1 seconds.

Maybe you shouldn't be inciting the nuts on your side to violence. Its not like its some fringe wing of the Democrats doing this. And the ONLY violence I've seen any Democrats denounce was the firebombing of the North Carolina Republican HQ.

(06-14-2017 09:20 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

I'm glad you mentioned Schumer specifically. Absolutely he is. Not in public... he'll do the dog and pony "senseless violence"... try and parlay it into a gun control issue, and then go have a celebratory cigar in private.

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

There are ****heads on this board that will be pleased with this shooting. Plus, it will give them the opportunity to cry about gun control. Oh, joy. You know it's coming. Never let a tragedy go to waste.

(06-14-2017 09:04 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:59 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:57 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:48 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  Was just on Facebook and this story is a trending topic. One of the responses on the wall quipped: "Is it wrong that I smiled when I heard Steve Scalise was shot?"

There were 20 responses, over half which agreed and compared Republicans to Hitler and rapists who deserve to be shot.

Damn dude you need to clean house. I won't associate with people like that, period.

"faceshite"....it's pretty simple to wipe the slate....

I've repeatedly thought about taking a hiatus from FB. It's just convenient to keep in touch with college friends that live around the country, and the new marketplace sections is awesome. I've grown increasingly tired of the non-stop ads and extreme liberal bias when it comes to censorship.

My wife has too. We have some friends who are just over the top obsessed with hating Trump. She gets tired of reading that all the time.

(06-14-2017 09:20 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

....in the back of his 'mind'.....that's debatable....

maybe this finally becomes a wake-up call for both parties.....

#wishfulthinking

(06-14-2017 09:21 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:20 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

I'm glad you mentioned Schumer specifically. Absolutely he is. Not in public... he'll do the dog and pony "senseless violence"... try and parlay it into a gun control issue, and then go have a celebratory cigar in private.

Oh bless your heart.

(06-14-2017 09:25 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:21 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:20 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

I'm glad you mentioned Schumer specifically. Absolutely he is. Not in public... he'll do the dog and pony "senseless violence"... try and parlay it into a gun control issue, and then go have a celebratory cigar in private.

Oh bless your heart.

Watch it happen. Crocodile tears, then gun control, then back to being an ******* as usual.

Schumer is busy trying to find more gonads to hand out to democratic members after Sessions left them all castrated yesterday.

(06-14-2017 09:23 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:20 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:17 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  This tragedy is 100% squarely on the Democrats and the MSM. No getting around that. They'll feign concern and sadness over this act of partisan violence, but they'll no doubt high five each other behind closed doors. This is what they want. By any means necessary.

you really think that? So Schumer is popping bottles because of this?

....in the back of his 'mind'.....that's debatable....

maybe this finally becomes a wake-up call for both parties.....

#wishfulthinking

A wake up call to what? Just like when Giffords was shot it was a deranged nutjob, this one will be spun the same way and forgotten in 6 months.

This has consequences.

(06-14-2017 09:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

Was there a "resistance" against Gabbie Giffords or the Obama gov't?

Uh. Really? First black President. Do you seriously have to ask that question?

(06-14-2017 09:28 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

Was there a "resistance" against Gabbie Giffords or the Obama gov't?

Uh. Really? First black President. Do you seriously have to ask that question?

Yeah, I do have to ask that question. Was there a "resistance" campaign that was backed by a near 247 news cycle of negative coverage? Nowhere close. The "rssistance" to Obama was a handful of rednecks doing stupid **** in their front yards. Surely you aren't this dense.

(06-14-2017 09:30 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:28 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

Was there a "resistance" against Gabbie Giffords or the Obama gov't?

Uh. Really? First black President. Do you seriously have to ask that question?

Yeah, I do have to ask that question. Was there a "resistance" campaign that was backed by a near 247 news cycle of negative coverage? Nowhere close. The "rssistance" to Obama was a handful of rednecks doing stupid **** in their front yards. Surely you aren't this dense.

Yeah it blows my mind when people think there was really much backlash against Obama for being the first black president. There were some idiots, some manufactured/debunked news stories, and that's about it. With Trump, it's a non-stop barrage of negative media coverage, paid protests, and violence.

(06-14-2017 09:28 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

Was there a "resistance" against Gabbie Giffords or the Obama gov't?

Uh. Really? First black President. Do you seriously have to ask that question?

Damn right I will ask it. You are a typical lib that refuses to the reality of the organized resistance against Trump. Obama had typical opposition from those that wanted him to lose, but he was accepted and no billion dollar organized resistance was mounted against him. You libs have let your hate consume you and today you see one result of that hate you foster and push.

(06-14-2017 08:56 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

we do think for ourselves....and I've called out both sides

that's just more msm brainwash bullshite....

completely disagree.....how in the hell do you "fix people" with that line of thinking???

Both sides deserve to be called out, so I applaud that. But what part do you disagree with?

I bet you most of the conservatives on this board only watch Fox News and got to sites like Brietbart and Infowars.

Similar, I bet the liberals on this board only go to MSNBC, CNN or Huffington Post.

Those establishments don't exist unless their are people that will religious patronize their drivel. The polarization in the country is only growing a wider divide. The more people only listen to views that already support their established the views the wider the polarization will grow.

MSM going out on a limb and now reporting shooter was a member of Antifa.




Kidding. They only make ridiculous assumptions when they can pin it on the TEA Party.

(06-14-2017 09:01 AM)fsquid Wrote:  never let a crisis go to waste

Thanks for the quote, Dead Fish.

(06-14-2017 09:28 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 09:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 08:52 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I see a lot of people attack "liberals." I am not one. I will not be put into a category. I think for myself. And because I think for myself I find this to reprehensible for some of you to say some of the things you are saying.

If you did not say the exact same thing about the biased opinions by far right wing "media" when Kathy Giffords was shot then you are living a double standard. You know, it's deplorable when the bad people attack "my side" of the political spectrum but when the other side of the political spectrum is attacked by those "with my political views" then just go quiet, sweep it under the rug and wait for the next time the other side goes rogue so you can criticize them again. This is exactly what both sides currently do.

People need to stop being sheep. The problem isn't the media. The problem is the people who increasingly only want to be informed by their pre-existing viewpoints and don't care what the other viewpoints might be. And as a result the media further caters to that. Until the people think independently with their own brains this is only going to get worse.

Was there a "resistance" against Gabbie Giffords or the Obama gov't?

Uh. Really? First black President. Do you seriously have to ask that question?

Once again, Gabby Giffords was not shot by a person on the right. Giffords shooter hated Bush, and actually attended a Giffords event earlier, asked her a question, then got mad at how he felt she didnt answer the question the way he wanted her to.

The organized resistance against Trump and others have now caused violent injury. People like former AG Lynch, Griffen, several news media pundant are to be blamed for encouraging violence and hate toward their fellow human being. Another example of that hate is Evergreen college.