https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dem...checks-rpt

Quote:All 44 House Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, reportedly waived background checks on IT worker Imran Iran and all of his family members according to The Daily Caller.

The Pakistan-born IT aides allegedly gained “unauthorized access” to Congressional data while working for House Democrats last year.

The House security policy requires mandatory background checks but a technical loophole may have allowed another member to vouch for them, according to investigative reporter Luke Rosiak.

Quote:If they had run the background check, the would have found a host of major red flags, including multiple criminal convictions, a $1.1 million bankruptcy, fraud-related lawsuits and 12 cryptic limited liability companies tied to numerous family members.

Wouldn't wanna be discriminatory or anything!

Next you're going to wanna do something crazy like find out how many citizens the US has via the US Census

(04-02-2018 08:40 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Wouldn't wanna be discriminatory or anything!

Next you're going to wanna do something crazy like find out how many citizens the US has via the US Census

Well thats obviously going waaaaay too far. Next you'll want to require an ID to vote. lol...this isnt Russia. Go that route and before you know it the government will want to require people to buy insurance.

Wow

(04-02-2018 10:30 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Wow

there's really no other way to respond to that.....

it's expected in today's version of horseshite.....

they're fk'n pigs....always have been my entire life....

this country had an opportunity to do something special after the 50s and 60s.....and they butchered it to hell and back....

(04-02-2018 10:18 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 08:40 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Wouldn't wanna be discriminatory or anything!

Next you're going to wanna do something crazy like find out how many citizens the US has via the US Census

Well thats obviously going waaaaay too far. Next you'll want to require an ID to vote. lol...this isnt Russia. Go that route and before you know it the government will want to require people to buy insurance.

You're not forced to do anything!!!!

You just have to pay a tax if you lose your job and benefits.

Quote:The Pakistan-born IT aides allegedly gained “unauthorized access” to Congressional data while working for House Democrats last year.

Pakistan-born IT aides without background checks. What could go wrong?

"according to The Daily Caller."

(04-02-2018 11:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  "according to The Daily Caller."

You think Jim Acosta is going to report this?

#Sad

#WillfullyIgnorant

#StillWithHer

(04-02-2018 11:26 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 11:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  "according to The Daily Caller."

You think Jim Acosta is going to report this?

#Sad

#WillfullyIgnorant

#StillWithHer

#Alwayswithherwantstomarryher

(04-02-2018 11:30 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 11:26 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 11:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  "according to The Daily Caller."

You think Jim Acosta is going to report this?

#Sad

#WillfullyIgnorant

#StillWithHer

#Alwayswithherwantstomarryher

#HasThisAsHisBackgroundImage

And you likely masturbate to photos of a bow tie. Sad.

(04-02-2018 11:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And you likely masturbate to photos of a bow tie. Sad.

/\ the sound of defeat.....

(04-02-2018 08:37 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dem...checks-rpt

Quote:All 44 House Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, reportedly waived background checks on IT worker Imran Iran and all of his family members according to The Daily Caller.

The Pakistan-born IT aides allegedly gained “unauthorized access” to Congressional data while working for House Democrats last year.

The House security policy requires mandatory background checks but a technical loophole may have allowed another member to vouch for them, according to investigative reporter Luke Rosiak.

Quote:If they had run the background check, the would have found a host of major red flags, including multiple criminal convictions, a $1.1 million bankruptcy, fraud-related lawsuits and 12 cryptic limited liability companies tied to numerous family members.

Does anyone need any more proof the dems really do hate the USA.

(04-02-2018 12:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 08:37 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dem...checks-rpt

Quote:All 44 House Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, reportedly waived background checks on IT worker Imran Iran and all of his family members according to The Daily Caller.

The Pakistan-born IT aides allegedly gained “unauthorized access” to Congressional data while working for House Democrats last year.

The House security policy requires mandatory background checks but a technical loophole may have allowed another member to vouch for them, according to investigative reporter Luke Rosiak.

Quote:If they had run the background check, the would have found a host of major red flags, including multiple criminal convictions, a $1.1 million bankruptcy, fraud-related lawsuits and 12 cryptic limited liability companies tied to numerous family members.

Does anyone need any more proof the dems really do hate the USA.

To me, this is just another data point that reinforces my belief that dims can't be trusted with sensitive data.

(04-02-2018 12:27 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 12:24 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(04-02-2018 08:37 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dem...checks-rpt

Quote:All 44 House Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, reportedly waived background checks on IT worker Imran Iran and all of his family members according to The Daily Caller.

The Pakistan-born IT aides allegedly gained “unauthorized access” to Congressional data while working for House Democrats last year.

The House security policy requires mandatory background checks but a technical loophole may have allowed another member to vouch for them, according to investigative reporter Luke Rosiak.

Quote:If they had run the background check, the would have found a host of major red flags, including multiple criminal convictions, a $1.1 million bankruptcy, fraud-related lawsuits and 12 cryptic limited liability companies tied to numerous family members.

Does anyone need any more proof the dems really do hate the USA.

To me, this is just another data point that reinforces my belief that dims can't be trusted with sensitive data.

How many Republicans are working for the current admin on interim clearances?