(05-06-2018 06:28 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ohhh my God. You guys are actually celebrating a Russian Troll farm operation to see what Mueller has.

No Mach... I just want the F'ing truth to come out and not for 6 more years of this clown show to distract us from doing things.

And when Muller indicts someone but is not ready to prosecute them.... then this is a clown show.

Quote:If you had no crimes to worry about why go through such lengths?

Funny, I thought the same thing when Hillary wiped her server and her people smashed their phones...

Quote:Team over country. Traitors

I suppose since that's how you operated for the past few years, thats how you would assume others are behaving.

Here's the thing.... I don't think Trump colluded. I think Hillary lose because she ran a lazy campaign under the assumption her "blue wall" did not need to be defended.

But on the off chance he did, let's get it out in the open..... Muller said he had a reason to prosecute these companies, one of the showed up, and now he's "not ready"...

FFS, he's a joke.

Remember when Mach said he wanted to wait to see what Mueller had to say. Now, in this case, he doesnt want to hear it.

This entire farce is a Rosenfetus/Buehller ruse to fabricate some sense of honest investigation while continuing to try to lift every rock to find some dirt on Trump. Sickens me.

(05-06-2018 06:28 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ohhh my God. You guys are actually celebrating a Russian Troll farm operation to see what Mueller has. If you had no crimes to worry about why go through such lengths? Team over country. Traitors

When did you co-opt the whole "team over country" meme? Right after you read it from one of us? I do wish you guys would get your own statements, it's not a good look to be stealing ours.

Nope......

I like using your own words against you......

It’s better that way

Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????


Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

Quit being putin’s chamber maid and get on the right side of history. Any attack against Meueller is an attack on America itself.

(05-07-2018 07:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????


Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

Quit being putin’s chamber maid and get on the right side of history. Any attack against Meueller is an attack on America itself.

He's running amateur hour to protect a job he's not doing.

If you're for Mueller you're for undermining the POTUS and definitely attacking this country.

(05-07-2018 07:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????

None of them were conducted by anyone with the power to charge or indict.

Quote:Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

All for process crimes unrelated to the matters he was supposed to be investigating.

Let's see, I thought the narrative was supposed to be that "the Russians" hacked the DNC computers and that a major purpose was to figure out ow to prevent such attacks in the future. Seems to me that if you were investigating that, then you would start with the DNC computers instead of with Manafort's failure to register as a foreign agent ten years ago.

Quote:Quit being putin’s chamber maid and get on the right side of history. Any attack against Meueller is an attack on America itself.

Mueller may very well be the one conducting the attack on America itself. He certainly appears willing to bend the rules a bit to get what he wants, and that is both troubling and inherently un-American. You don't get the criticisms his team got from judges on Friday if you're playing by the rules.

(05-07-2018 07:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????

Well since her highness destroyed her mail server and phones... And since O's justice department did not take the investigation seriously...

Quote:Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

Maybe, maybe not... After all one of his most "high profile" indictments just said "See you in court" and Mueller blinked.

(05-07-2018 08:55 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 07:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????

None of them were conducted by anyone with the power to charge or indict.

Quote:Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

All for process crimes unrelated to the matters he was supposed to be investigating.

Let's see, I thought the narrative was supposed to be that "the Russians" hacked the DNC computers and that a major purpose was to figure out ow to prevent such attacks in the future. Seems to me that if you were investigating that, then you would start with the DNC computers instead of with Manafort's failure to register as a foreign agent ten years ago.

Quote:Quit being putin’s chamber maid and get on the right side of history. Any attack against Meueller is an attack on America itself.

Mueller may very well be the one conducting the attack on America itself. He certainly appears willing to bend the rules a bit to get what he wants, and that is both troubling and inherently un-American. You don't get the criticisms his team got from judges on Friday if you're playing by the rules.

was predicted by many at the outset.....

what a fk'n pile of dung this has become.....

the entire premise of how our legal system should function is upside fk'n down.....

a country of laws????? whose laws????

what a selective joke.....

(05-07-2018 07:18 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Those Benghazi show trials got how many indictments btw????


Mueller has quite a few pelts and more on the way....

Quit being putin’s chamber maid and get on the right side of history. Any attack against Meueller is an attack on America itself.

The Benghazi hearings were about the Constitutional duty of the Legislative branch of government to exercise oversight over the Executive branch. They were not a criminal hearing thus no indictments were going to be had.

If you were half as ******* smart as you think you are you would have known that since legislative oversight as a Constitutional duty is taught at the high school level.

Maybe what you need to do is stop spamming these boards with your bull**** and actually learn the Constitution so that you don't look like an ignorant fool when you try to trot out the "whataboutism" defense.

Goodness gracious you guys are insane. You have zero problem with Benghazi being investigated to ad nauseum 5 different times but want to pull the plug on an investigation bearing fruit. Don’t worry. The truth shall be set free. Too many eyeballs on this one. “If you are truly innocent act like it.”- Trey Gowdy

So, how is the indictment "fake" again?

(05-07-2018 10:19 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Goodness gracious you guys are insane. You have zero problem with Benghazi being investigated to ad nauseum 5 different times but want to pull the plug on an investigation bearing fruit. Don’t worry. The truth shall be set free. Too many eyeballs on this one. “If you are truly innocent act like it.”- Trey Gowdy

Benghazi was never truly investigated. We had some whitewash efforts and some dog-and-pony show congressional hearings, but no real investigation. The bureaucratic state circled the wagons, and nobody ever got to the truth.

Either there was a colossal failure of intelligence or massive dereliction of duty. You either had bad intel or somebody with the proper intel made an incredibly stupid decision. Something like Benghazi doesn't happen without one or the other. You don't get where we found ourselves because everybody did their job right. We have a congressional "investigation" tell us that there was "no failure of intelligence." I don't believe that, but let's assume it's true. Then somebody (or bodies) screwed the pooch massively. But nobody got fried (figuratively, not literally) for it. That's a blatant miscarriage of justice IMO.

By the way, I don't think Hillary is necessarily the one who screwed the pooch on this one. I think it's far more likely some mid-to-upper-management-level career bureaucrat. But we didn't find out who it was, because the bureaucratic state circled the wagons and the republicans were too fixated on naming Hillary rather than finding the actual culprit. But if it were Hillary, and you wanted to nail her, the best way is probably to find that middle manager, go after him or her, and follow the paper trail that he or she produces in defense.

That's how Mueller is going after Trump. The only difference is that Benghazi was a massive screw-up, res ipsa loquitur, but there's still no res ipsa loquitur crime around Trump. And what fruit is Mueller's investigation bearing anyway? That Manafort failed to file the proper paperwork ten years ago? I hardly consider that a threat to our democracy. Actual Russian hacking is a treat. But if that's what we are most worried about, why have the allegedly hacked servers not been examined by law enforcement? And why were Hillary's misadventures with non-secure servers and classified information not regarded as attacks on America?

People died in benghazi

(05-07-2018 10:47 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  People died in benghazi

It's OK, must of them were probably Republican votes anyway.

(05-07-2018 10:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, how is the indictment "fake" again?

The indictment isn't fake, the special counsel just filed it for political theater and never expected to actually prosecute it. Now the defendants called his bluff and demanded speedy trial. Mueller will likely have to dismiss the case at some point. Very embarassing I'm sure.

(05-07-2018 10:19 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Goodness gracious you guys are insane. You have zero problem with Benghazi being investigated to ad nauseum 5 different times but want to pull the plug on an investigation bearing fruit. Don’t worry. The truth shall be set free. Too many eyeballs on this one. “If you are truly innocent act like it.”- Trey Gowdy

Welll—people actually died in Benghazi. The Meuller investigation is only happening because the Dems got butt hurt. They actually thought those liberal CNN fake news pre-election polls were real.

(05-07-2018 11:11 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(05-07-2018 10:19 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Goodness gracious you guys are insane. You have zero problem with Benghazi being investigated to ad nauseum 5 different times but want to pull the plug on an investigation bearing fruit. Don’t worry. The truth shall be set free. Too many eyeballs on this one. “If you are truly innocent act like it.”- Trey Gowdy

Welll—people actually died in Benghazi. The Meuller investigation is only happening because the Dems got butt hurt. They actually thought those liberal CNN fake news pre-election polls were real.

Just because you say it does not make it so.