(05-15-2018 08:29 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  If I were Trump, I’d offer to reinstate portions of the deal in exchange for solid proof

Yep. I would as well. Can you imagine the squealing??

(05-15-2018 02:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-15-2018 02:40 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:20 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Bless your heart.

And CNN sucks too. Not exactly a high bar.

CNN doesn't even constitute a speed bump.

Dude...just stop. GP is one of the worst.

And CNN isn't?

Just because they have a huge budget and run shows 24x7 does not mean they are trustworthy.

In fact, they've been shown to be ideologically biased.

The question isn't "do they say anything trustworthy". Rather, the question is "why should I trust what they say."

Yes, CNN is bad and somewhat partisan, but they have way more credibly than GP. It's not even close.

There are Iranian sources that one can easily get from a web search, but the MSM has not reported it at all. Israeli journalists have, why not American ones except bloggers.

(05-15-2018 06:40 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  On the list...

Hillary Clinton
John (Gomer Pyle) Kerry
Barack Obama
Chuck Schumer
Harry Reid
Nancy Pelosi
Joe Biden

aka the usual suspects

Other than maybe Schumer or Pelosi, that lists makes zero sense. Why would anyone bribe people who were totally in favor of the deal all along?

(05-15-2018 10:02 PM)NoDak Wrote:  

(05-15-2018 02:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-15-2018 02:40 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:20 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  CNN doesn't even constitute a speed bump.

Dude...just stop. GP is one of the worst.

And CNN isn't?

Just because they have a huge budget and run shows 24x7 does not mean they are trustworthy.

In fact, they've been shown to be ideologically biased.

The question isn't "do they say anything trustworthy". Rather, the question is "why should I trust what they say."

Yes, CNN is bad and somewhat partisan, but they have way more credibly than GP. It's not even close.

There are Iranian sources that one can easily get from a web search, but the MSM has not reported it at all. Israeli journalists have, why not American ones except bloggers.

Maybe because the Iranian sources are not verifiable or trustworthy?

(05-15-2018 02:40 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:20 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-14-2018 03:09 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  More reliable than CNN.

Bless your heart.

And CNN sucks too. Not exactly a high bar.

CNN doesn't even constitute a speed bump.

Dude...just stop. GP is one of the worst.

And CNN isn't?

Just because they have a huge budget and run shows 24x7 does not mean they are trustworthy.

In fact, they've been shown to be ideologically biased.

The question isn't "do they say anything trustworthy". Rather, the question is "why should I trust what they say."

CNN (and it's cohorts) are the Leni Riefenstahl of the 21st Century.....

So Iran.........

Releasing the names would be a win for Trump. Unfortunately, I don't see Iran wanting to do that.

Absolutely freaking hilarious for any TRUMPKIN to be posting ANYTHING about any bribe................

talk about pot meeting kettle