(07-28-2016 01:41 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: 1) Turfing out Manafort and Page and Flynn.
2) Providing a clear statement of support, with military to back it up for the Eastern European NATO allies
3) Releasing his financials
4) Clear and consistent condemnation of Putin
5) Support for continued sanctions over Crimea
That's a good start. But instead Trump
1) Keeps his compromised national security advisors and campaign staff
2) Doesn't support NATO or its Eastern European allies
3) Wont release his financials
4) Praises Putin
5) No support for sanctions over Crimea.
---
We greenlight Putin in Ukraine and we greenlight China in Taiwan.
1) how about the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty?
2) he ran on this and won
3) he ran on that and won also
4) He's said some good AND some bad things about him, just as Obama did. Only a fool routinely bashes someone and then expects their help in say, Iran.
5) debatable. It wasn't the first time Russia had done this and Obama said they weren't a threat.
The left INITIALLY claimed that Trump was bad for thumbing our nose at China and acknowledging the call from the Taiwan PM, claiming he'd jeopardized our NK situation... Now you're saying that we should curry favor with Taiwan and that it WON'T jeopardize our NK situation. The spin is amazing.
Look Tom, we get that you disagree with Trump on the color of the sky and the wetness of water, but your bellyaching over every little thing is old.
This is a thread about what the democrats did to rig the election, and you've once again deflected it into some sort of rant against Russia and especially Trump.
You CHEATED and still lost. Maybe, just maybe your opinions are VASTLY more minority and out of the mainstream than you care to admit.