(06-14-2018 11:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:52 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:42 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:34 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:22 AM)bullet Wrote:  "...The report, according to Bloomberg, however found that “we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed....”

Wait - I thought we were buckling up?

And I guess you think these type of comments carry no meaning in the scope of anything actually, right?

Good luck with that...

That's what's been posted almost every time a little smidgen of info about the IG's report has been released - "buckle up!"

Now, barring something unforeseen, it appears that the only reason anyone needs to buckle up is because this whole thing is going to come to a screeching halt.

]Strzok: I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I'm afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40.

Sedition.

So, where are all the other messages continuing this discussion, then? Coups aren't borne out of one ambiguous text.

Strzok was clearly no fan of Trump, and was rightfully removed from the Russia investigation, but if that lame connection qualifies as sedition, Trump's guilty of collusion 50 times over.

(06-14-2018 11:56 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:54 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:50 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:49 AM)shere khan Wrote:  So only attempted murder. Half arsed FBI. Democrats must be swelling with pride

I see the repub talking points have already been given out.

Nobody thinks for me, of that you can be sure.

Texts between two people who IIRC were dating saying something worth an eyebrow raise. Shocking, shocking stuff, I tell you.

Wasn't it just yesterday that someone was saying that we shouldn't take everything the president says literally? I guess that only applies if they have an R after their name?

Lol. Just two people right? Lmao. You are about to get your feelings hurt if you think this is just two people.

This text thread is between two people.

(06-14-2018 12:04 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:55 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:52 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:42 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:34 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  Wait - I thought we were buckling up?

And I guess you think these type of comments carry no meaning in the scope of anything actually, right?

Good luck with that...

That's what's been posted almost every time a little smidgen of info about the IG's report has been released - "buckle up!"

Now, barring something unforeseen, it appears that the only reason anyone needs to buckle up is because this whole thing is going to come to a screeching halt.

]Strzok: I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I'm afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40.

Sedition.

So, where are all the other messages continuing this discussion, then? Coups aren't borne out of one ambiguous text.

Strzok was clearly no fan of Trump, and was rightfully removed from the Russia investigation, but if that lame connection qualifies as sedition, Trump's guilty of collusion 50 times over.

Ok

(06-14-2018 11:57 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:56 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:54 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:50 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  I see the repub talking points have already been given out.

Nobody thinks for me, of that you can be sure.

Texts between two people who IIRC were dating saying something worth an eyebrow raise. Shocking, shocking stuff, I tell you.

Wasn't it just yesterday that someone was saying that we shouldn't take everything the president says literally? I guess that only applies if they have an R after their name?

Lol

Spot on. The fact that there has been yet another round of this investigation is laughable.

Still with her I see.

(06-14-2018 12:09 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:57 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:56 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:54 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:51 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

Nobody thinks for me, of that you can be sure.

Texts between two people who IIRC were dating saying something worth an eyebrow raise. Shocking, shocking stuff, I tell you.

Wasn't it just yesterday that someone was saying that we shouldn't take everything the president says literally? I guess that only applies if they have an R after their name?

Lol

Spot on. The fact that there has been yet another round of this investigation is laughable.

Still with her I see.

Nah, but you're still trying to stay buckled up after the ride's over, I see.

Hang on! I thought this was about Hillary’s emails. These text are after Trump was Republican nominated. In my best green.....


Conflating issues

Mark Meadows

@RepMarkMeadows

Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok reply: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” This Peter Strzok text about "stopping" Donald Trump was hidden from Congressional investigators. We never had it. Absolutely unreal.

12:06 PM · Jun 14, 2018


It's happening

Tigergreen to tell us this is all love bird chat in 3,2,1

Looks like Crooked Hillary is going to jail.

(06-14-2018 12:12 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 12:09 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:57 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:56 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 11:54 AM)tigergreen Wrote:  Texts between two people who IIRC were dating saying something worth an eyebrow raise. Shocking, shocking stuff, I tell you.

Wasn't it just yesterday that someone was saying that we shouldn't take everything the president says literally? I guess that only applies if they have an R after their name?

Lol

Spot on. The fact that there has been yet another round of this investigation is laughable.

Still with her I see.

Nah, but you're still trying to stay buckled up after the ride's over, I see.

Only one clown on this forum kept repeating the buckle up mantra. I believe he is now declared clinically insane for all intents and purposes.

(06-14-2018 12:25 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Only one clown on this forum kept repeating the buckle up mantra. I believe he is now declared clinically insane for all intents and purposes.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-806376.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-816157.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-817119.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-813152.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822118.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822862.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-830181.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-839239.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-841829.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-850861.html

Uh oh



Reality is starting settle in. Fake Tapper even gets it.

(06-14-2018 12:38 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 12:25 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Only one clown on this forum kept repeating the buckle up mantra. I believe he is now declared clinically insane for all intents and purposes.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-806376.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-816157.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-817119.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-813152.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822118.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822862.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-830181.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-839239.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-841829.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-850861.html

Buckle up, indeed.

(06-14-2018 12:38 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 12:25 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Only one clown on this forum kept repeating the buckle up mantra. I believe he is now declared clinically insane for all intents and purposes.

https://csnbbs.com/thread-806376.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-816157.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-817119.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-813152.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822118.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-822862.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-830181.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-839239.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-841829.html
https://csnbbs.com/thread-850861.html

well played

Kyle Cheney

@kyledcheney

IG found that on numerous occasions, COMEY used a personal GMail account to conduct official FBI business, according to source briefed on the report

(06-14-2018 01:01 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

For those that don't see the Twitter



Lee Zeldin

@RepLeeZeldin

Peter Strzok, who launched counter intel probe on Trump campaign, texted "we'll stop" Trump from being elected. The reality is the invest. was launched bc Pres Trump became GOP nominee, was extended w/FISA abuse bc he was closer to winning & became Special Counsel probe bc he won

12:21 PM · Jun 14, 2018

(06-14-2018 12:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Mark Meadows

@RepMarkMeadows

Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok reply: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” This Peter Strzok text about "stopping" Donald Trump was hidden from Congressional investigators. We never had it. Absolutely unreal.

12:06 PM · Jun 14, 2018


It's happening

Tigergreen to tell us this is all love bird chat in 3,2,1

Dude - even Fox News knows nothing is "happening" with this.

Buried under all the "texting scandal" headlines are the facts about the investigation: that it “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence [in the Clinton case] that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed.”

Strzok & Page were removed from investigations, and have been reassigned or left the bureau altogether, & rightly so. Strzok might get canned from this - BFD. Unless this report comes out with something else that hasn't already been leaked to the media, for all intents & purposes, it's done.

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa says despite any claims of it being watered down, the new IG report is "still extremely damning of an infection at the Department of Justice in favor of” Clinton. He also cites "the transmission of sealed grand jury information to a Gmail account."

muh Russia now hinges on the argument that firing someone found to be insubordinate and who broke protocol was "obstruction". Oh, and his own memos say he wasn't obstructed.

Good. Luck. With. That.