(06-15-2018 12:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So this nobody, Strzok, held power over a FISA court judge.

Do you guys even listen to yourselves? Geez.

Quote:Strzok was the Chief of the Counterespionage Section and led the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server.

Strzok rose to become the Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, which is the number two position in that division, and led the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

Do you ever consider what you're about to write? Geez.

(06-15-2018 12:53 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(06-15-2018 12:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So this nobody, Strzok, held power over a FISA court judge.

Do you guys even listen to yourselves? Geez.

Quote:Strzok was the Chief of the Counterespionage Section and led the FBI's investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server.

Strzok rose to become the Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, which is the number two position in that division, and led the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

Do you ever consider what you're about to write? Geez.

(06-15-2018 12:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's not a nobody, he was #2 in the counterintelligence division of the FBI, and had his hands all over everything.

FISA court is a rubber stamp.

You know all this. You're losing. Enjoy!

So, if FISA court is a rubber stamp, why the need to doctor a case?

Just stop it already.

(06-15-2018 12:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-15-2018 12:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's not a nobody, he was #2 in the counterintelligence division of the FBI, and had his hands all over everything.

FISA court is a rubber stamp.

You know all this. You're losing. Enjoy!

So, if FISA court is a rubber stamp, why the need to doctor a case?

Just stop it already.

99.97% approval rate. First one (June 2016) was denied, remember? That's why you needed it doctored (with democratic-funded oppo research), and how weak your case is.

https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justic...t-request/

(06-15-2018 11:47 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 01:06 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  Dude - even Fox News knows nothing is "happening" with this.

Buried under all the "texting scandal" headlines are the facts about the investigation: that it “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence [in the Clinton case] that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed.”

Strzok & Page were removed from investigations, and have been reassigned or left the bureau altogether, & rightly so. Strzok might get canned from this - BFD. Unless this report comes out with something else that hasn't already been leaked to the media, for all intents & purposes, it's done.

Reads a whole lot like all of the reports accusing Trump of collusion, yet you simultaneously state that he's guilty. The only difference is, you don't have any emails or texts from anyone saying 'Hillary won't win, the Russians will stop her.'

I haven't declared Trump guilty - I've said there's a lot of smoke for there to be no fire, but by & large I've been quiet on the Mueller investigation as a whole - a lot of things can change in it between now & the time it's over.

(06-15-2018 01:18 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(06-15-2018 11:47 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(06-14-2018 01:06 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  Dude - even Fox News knows nothing is "happening" with this.

Buried under all the "texting scandal" headlines are the facts about the investigation: that it “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence [in the Clinton case] that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed.”

Strzok & Page were removed from investigations, and have been reassigned or left the bureau altogether, & rightly so. Strzok might get canned from this - BFD. Unless this report comes out with something else that hasn't already been leaked to the media, for all intents & purposes, it's done.

Reads a whole lot like all of the reports accusing Trump of collusion, yet you simultaneously state that he's guilty. The only difference is, you don't have any emails or texts from anyone saying 'Hillary won't win, the Russians will stop her.'

I haven't declared Trump guilty - I've said there's a lot of smoke for there to be no fire, but by & large I've been quiet on the Mueller investigation as a whole - a lot of things can change in it between now & the time it's over.

lol, there's literally zero smoke.

The only indictments mueller has filed not only have nothing to do with Trump, but the defendants who have showed up in court to defend themselves have been met with unreasonable delays and refusals by mueller to hand over exculpatory evidence, which go against any and all legal common sense. You would expect the defendant to be one requesting the delays, not the guy who filed the charges!

It's almost like it was all fake (mueller did indict a fake company) and just a PR stunt. Like, "Woah, you aren't supposed to be here! I was just looking for a headline."

(06-15-2018 01:07 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-15-2018 12:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-15-2018 12:51 PM)Kronke Wrote:  He's not a nobody, he was #2 in the counterintelligence division of the FBI, and had his hands all over everything.

FISA court is a rubber stamp.

You know all this. You're losing. Enjoy!

So, if FISA court is a rubber stamp, why the need to doctor a case?

Just stop it already.

99.97% approval rate. First one (June 2016) was denied, remember? That's why you needed it doctored (with democratic-funded oppo research), and how weak your case is.

https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justic...t-request/

Damn Tommy's off his game. This week must have been devastating for him.

Everyone needs to listen to never-Trumper Ben Shapiro’s show from today on the IG report. He says a lot of what I’ve been saying, except better, because he’s a lot smarter.

He’s always been a skeptic regarding the FBI going after Trump, he is now growing more suspicious.