(06-25-2018 05:24 PM)Stugray2 Wrote: You only need 6 members. A 7th is a luxury.
Note: CSUB dropping is possibly a boon for SJSU as CSU recruiting standards are lower than UC or USC and Stanford. This should increase the pool of non-UC academic level talent they can recruit -- now given the lack of investment in recruiting that may be more theoretical than actual.
The MPSF is simply an organization for hosting Tournaments. What it means is Indiana sends it's women's team out to California for the Tournament, which is what, four days including the weekend. Maybe two or three lost school days at most -- pretending remote session participation is not yet at IU (it is).
This could also help Indiana recruit Californians at least for water polo, which I suspect is the real reason behind the move.
If you look at IU's schedule this year, you see they played a lot of West Coast schools already
http://iuhoosiers.com/schedule.aspx?path=wwpolo
Indiana isn't planning to limit its MPSF participation to the season-ending tournament but rather will play a full slate of MPSF matches:
https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/ne...ater-polo/
However it's clear from this article that you're right about Indiana joining the MPSF to improve its program, both with respect to recruiting as well as competition in the pool.
As for SJSU, yes its recruiting could improve as a result of CSUB's departure and that could help the Spartans become more competitive in the MPSF. Or, SJSU could get fed up with going head-to-head in conference against big-money P5 schools and choose to follow SDSU over to the GCC.
And that brings me back to the MPSF's motive for inviting Indiana, which I still attribute to auto bid preservation in case of SJSU's departure. Look at what happened to men's water polo in the MPSF. The conference's five non-P5 members (including the SJSU men's squad) bolted in 2015 to the GCC, leaving behind just Cal, Stanford, UCLA and USC. To save the MPSF auto bid the remaining members resorted to adding a
D-III program (Penn State Behrend in Erie, PA) and a
club program (Austin College in Sherman, TX). The full story is here:
https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/ne...oins-mpsf/
It's a little mind-boggling to me that the nation's most powerful D-1 programs in any collegiate sport would be allowed to park a former club team in their conference solely to end-run the rule governing who qualifies for a free ticket to the post-season. But hey, it's the NCAA "in charge" here so why should I be surprised?
At least in women's water polo the MPSF is being proactive and adding an institutional peer that has a chance to be competitive.