(07-04-2018 12:04 PM)DavidSt Wrote: (07-04-2018 07:17 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (07-04-2018 02:08 AM)DavidSt Wrote: Should Southern U. leave The SWAC?
I just found this article which is interesting. This was brought up after Hampton University announced that they are leaving MEAC and Savannah State dropping down. I think the FCS could rearrange to be more geographical regions because a lot lesser money at the lower D1 levels. This might also split The Southland into 2 conferences down the future as the Texas based Southland becoming the new SWC type. The Southland could be Louisiana, Arkansas and western Mississippi schools conference. SWAC could be pushed eastward by adding Bethune-Cookman, Florida A&M, Tuskegee, Lemoyne-Owen, and Albany State. That would help ease the travel somewhat for the northern MEAC schools.
In a word, No. Whatever financial difficulties SU is having are pretty common to all FCS schools. The Southland Conference is by no means a Land of Milk and Honey.
Like with all schools, the solution for SU is to build enthusiasm among its extensive fan base for its athletics. Playing new teams in another conference won't do that.
They could bring along their friends of Grambling State, Texas Southern and Prairie View. It could actually boost the attendance in the Southland if they did. Grambling Vs Southern draws FBS size crowd. Look what Hampton did? They left because Big South is more of an upgrade than where they were at. Southland would be an upgrade to the Southland Conference if they leave. Southland is actually making more money for their media rights than the SWAC. They would be playing McNeese State, SE La., NW La. State, Nicholls State and New Orleans. It would give Southern more exposure to bring in new students to enroll than where they are at right now.
SUBR already is very well known in Louisiana and east Texas, which is basically what the Southland conference is. There's no pick-up there in terms of exposure. If anything the SWAC provides more by giving SUBR exposure to the east, in Alabama and Mississippi.
Southern has problems because like all Louisiana schools, it has been subject to severe budget cuts the last 10 years. Those who think HBCUs are dinosaurs that waste taxpayer money and need to be lopped off should be happy, because that's basically what has happened.
Before Jindal in 2008, the state used to cover about 60% of SU's budget, now it's about 20% so the university is essentially "making it on its own" and not at taxpayer's expense now as it is. And crazily, for the first six years of this budget cutting, the state also mandated that SU (and other Louisiana schools) could not raise its tuition! That's because in Louisiana there is a state scholarship program called TOPS, that in-state students can get, and TOPS is tied to tuition, so if tuition goes up then the cost of TOPS goes up and the state government didn't want that, they were busy cutting taxes on the rich so Jindal could run for GOP nomination for President yelling about how he cut taxes every year (he did just that, and yelled just that, but lasted about 4 minutes in the 2016 race anyway).
So you cut a budget relentlessly but then refuse to let a school be entrepreneurial and raise its tuition? Revenue plummeted, so a lot of facilities are in disrepair in the athletics and academics domains. That hurts recruiting, which hurts quality on the field, and fan support. It also hurts regular student enrollment, which then means budgets have to be cut more, a downward cycle.
That is an internal issue and has nothing to do with conference membership. The SWAC is where SU belongs.