(07-13-2018 11:13 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 10:37 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 10:01 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(07-13-2018 09:30 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  A lot about Creighton, still stand by Tulsa being perceived as Xavier and Memphis?

Go back and read the thread. It was implied that the big east was better because of the teams added. My point was and remains that Houston, Memphis, and Tulsa are roughly equal to Butler, Xavier, and Memphis.

I read it. This was our exchange:

TU4Ever Wrote:Yes because Memphis and Tulsa just don't match Creighton and Xavier.

IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:Tulsa is not in the conversation with those 3.

Yes and reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Creighton and tulsa are the same. We were the same before we entered the new conferences.

Xavier and Memphis are the same and were before they entered the new conference.

The add ons were equal to each other.

Only in your own mind and world. Memphis hasn't made the Tournament in years and their glory years were under the honorable Calipari. Will they ever be relevant in hoops again? Tulsa might be the equivalent of Creighton but the numbers in recent years aren't so favorable. Maybe if you include the last 20-25 years and time in the MVC they are the better program. Move that goalpost if it makes your argument stronger and makes you feel better.