Of course, it's evil. The Democrats/leftists just don't care. They want power and control at all costs.

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 08:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Flakehas not said that he will vote against Kavanaugh. He just said the Committee shouldn’t vote until Ford has a chance to testify. Not unreasonable, IMHO.

If the Committee votes without letting her testify, the political blowback will be far more intense than anything we’ve seen in a long time. Now, with that said, Prof. Ford will have to present some proof to back up her accusation, or else Kavanaugh will be confirmed anyway.

In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 08:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Flakehas not said that he will vote against Kavanaugh. He just said the Committee shouldn’t vote until Ford has a chance to testify. Not unreasonable, IMHO.

If the Committee votes without letting her testify, the political blowback will be far more intense than anything we’ve seen in a long time. Now, with that said, Prof. Ford will have to present some proof to back up her accusation, or else Kavanaugh will be confirmed anyway.

In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 08:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Flakehas not said that he will vote against Kavanaugh. He just said the Committee shouldn’t vote until Ford has a chance to testify. Not unreasonable, IMHO.

If the Committee votes without letting her testify, the political blowback will be far more intense than anything we’ve seen in a long time. Now, with that said, Prof. Ford will have to present some proof to back up her accusation, or else Kavanaugh will be confirmed anyway.

In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

(09-17-2018 07:28 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 08:41 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Flakehas not said that he will vote against Kavanaugh. He just said the Committee shouldn’t vote until Ford has a chance to testify. Not unreasonable, IMHO.

If the Committee votes without letting her testify, the political blowback will be far more intense than anything we’ve seen in a long time. Now, with that said, Prof. Ford will have to present some proof to back up her accusation, or else Kavanaugh will be confirmed anyway.

In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

I agree. Waiting over 4 decades until the man is up for high profile position to report it is just as bad.

In a way, this should surprise no one.

They left is comprised of nasty, despicable, evil people.

They will stop at NOTHING to get their way.

They will stop at NOTHING to derail the system if they don't get their way.

They will stop at NOTHING to keep & maintain their power.

The right better come to the realization that if they EVER wish to govern in their way, they had better be prepared to play by the same rules the left does. They had better be prepared to play the same game as the left does.

If they don't, the left will besmirch, smear, and sully EVERY person, thought, and idea the right has.

(09-16-2018 05:06 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  The woman is now claiming Kavanaugh tried to kill her...

And Feinstein had his letter for months???

Absolutely deplorable.

Does this surprise anyone? I mean, we all knew the Dems would stoop to pulling the nuclear option as a last resort to slow down his confirmation. I'm just surprised it wasn't the race card. I'm sure they looked. It's beyond transparent this latest accusation is a farce.

(09-17-2018 07:31 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:28 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

I agree. Waiting over 4 decades until the man is up for high profile position to report it is just as bad.

well the woman has already had her home address and phone number leaked online, so I can see why some are hesitant.

(09-17-2018 08:25 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:31 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:28 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

I agree. Waiting over 4 decades until the man is up for high profile position to report it is just as bad.

well the woman has already had her home address and phone number leaked online, so I can see why some are hesitant.

Had it been reported when it happened that likely wouldn't have happened.

https://outline.com/zzNDjB

"...The timeline here is damning about Democratic motivations. The New Yorker says the woman first approached Democrats in July. Yet Ms. Feinstein didn’t ask about the accusation in her meeting with Judge Kavanaugh, didn’t ask about it at the hearing, and no Democrats asked about it in their 1,278 written follow-up questions after the hearing.

So why now? As we wrote Friday, the charitable explanation is that Ms. Feinstein didn’t think it worthy enough of investigation but finally bowed under pressure from her colleagues. She’s running for re-election against a left-wing Democrat who is pounding her for not stopping Mr. Kavanaugh and on Friday hit her for a “failure of leadership” for waiting to disclose the allegations...."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/b...egitimate/


"...For her part, Ford says she hasn’t spoken with Kavanaugh about any such incident or mentioned it to anyone until 2012; it came up then when the 45-year-old was having relationship therapy. The notes of Ford’s therapist include mention of an incident with students who became “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington,” but no names were given...."

Never mentioned to anyone for 30 years. Then last minute dropped in.

(09-17-2018 08:30 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 08:25 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:31 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:28 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

I agree. Waiting over 4 decades until the man is up for high profile position to report it is just as bad.

well the woman has already had her home address and phone number leaked online, so I can see why some are hesitant.

Had it been reported when it happened that likely wouldn't have happened.

haha, yea right. Prep schools cover up better than politicians

(09-16-2018 08:27 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Funny isn't it? Multiple accusations of unwanted, forced sexual contact and even battery by a man in a position of power isn't enough to bother anyone when a guy is running for president and has a (D) behind his name, but a claim that surfaces after 40 years

Wait...what...trump had a (D) behind his name?

P.S.: trump's **** was way more recent than 40 years...and didn't you vote for him?

(09-17-2018 07:31 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 07:28 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 06:02 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(09-17-2018 02:47 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 10:59 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  In order for this circus to be fair they need the guy that says he was there and nothing happen to testify too. If the Reps are too stupid to not see this joke of month promoted by the Demons then I'll lose all respect for them... as if they cared.

The guy who was there wrote a book saying he is an alcoholic. He even said in his book that when he is wasted on booze, he do not remember a thing. If he testify, he would be crucify as being an admitted drunk in hiw words, and will be forced to say he really do not remember of the night of the accusation that took place. Sadly, when boys in high school and college gets wasted on booze? They do stupid things, and think it is okay to have sex with girls. Nobody knows what animal would come out of anybody who gets wasted.

So maybe a mistake involving intoxication 40 ears ago when someone was a minor has no bearing on who they are now as a person and judge? That is, if you assume the allegation is true.

Rape or intended to rape is a bad thing mo matter when it happened. There is no excuse for it.

I agree. Waiting over 4 decades until the man is up for high profile position to report it is just as bad.

Go back and read this thread again, and you'll see why a woman might just wait a few years before coming forward with an allegation of this nature.

Sadly, in our society, this is not uncommon.

And doesn't she have records of discussing this event as recent as 2012...before anyone knew he would be a nominee to the court.

So to many of you, this never happened and the woman is just making all this up. Not knowing if anyone could come forward and conclusively prove that it didn't happen, thereby destroying her life...which may end up destroyed anyway, just to slow down the confirmation of a SCOTUS nominee that will likely be confirmed anyway?

I pray to God none of your loved ones are ever sexually assaulted.

(09-17-2018 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So to many of you, this never happened and the woman is just making all this up. Not knowing if anyone could come forward and conclusively prove that it didn't happen, thereby destroying her life...which may end up destroyed anyway, just to slow down the confirmation of a SCOTUS nominee that will likely be confirmed anyway?

I pray to God none of your loved ones are ever sexually assaulted.

No one is saying they condone an assault. However the timing is extremely suspect and trying to prove something happened or did not happen close to 40 years ago is next to impossible. If I did have a loved one have this happen I would strongly encourage them to report it immediately when memories and evidence are fresh and can prove their case.

(09-17-2018 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So to many of you, this never happened and the woman is just making all this up. Not knowing if anyone could come forward and conclusively prove that it didn't happen, thereby destroying her life...which may end up destroyed anyway, just to slow down the confirmation of a SCOTUS nominee that will likely be confirmed anyway?

I pray to God none of your loved ones are ever sexually assaulted.

I think it's perfectly fair to question whether "it happened".

Judge Kavanaugh has had decades of interactions with women, none of which resulted in anything close to this. In fact, he's had dozens of women coming to his defense saying he would never do something of this nature.

I also question how this supposed act NEVER came to light during his confirmations up the chain. When he was confirmed as an appeals court judge, nothing. If this were a CREDIBLE accusation, it would have come up by now.

Also in question is the timing. Old Feinstein held on to this "letter" until the opportune time. If this were, once again, credible, WHY WAIT? This smells more of a dirty trick that was kept up the proverbial sleeve just in case the torpedoing during the hearings didn't work.

The whole thing stinks to high heaven and I for one ain't buying it.

(09-17-2018 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So to many of you, this never happened and the woman is just making all this up. Not knowing if anyone could come forward and conclusively prove that it didn't happen, thereby destroying her life...which may end up destroyed anyway, just to slow down the confirmation of a SCOTUS nominee that will likely be confirmed anyway?

I pray to God none of your loved ones are ever sexually assaulted.

First of all. If this were to happen to my daughter, she would more than likely tell her mother instead of me if it was a bad deal. Then, of course, her mother would tell me. Then I would call my son into the room after my wife left the room and tell him what happened, where and with whom the boy is. Give him $100 to split with one of his buddies and justice would be served by the following weekend. And the kid could go on to be the pope for all I care.

(09-17-2018 09:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-16-2018 08:27 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Funny isn't it? Multiple accusations of unwanted, forced sexual contact and even battery by a man in a position of power isn't enough to bother anyone when a guy is running for president and has a (D) behind his name, but a claim that surfaces after 40 years

Wait...what...trump had a (D) behind his name?

P.S.: trump's **** was way more recent than 40 years...and didn't you vote for him?

There has never been any credible claim of anything other than leering against Trump.
Just anonymous people who disappeared after the election.

Even Democrats admit Bill Clinton was probably a rapist and its a fact he took advantage of a young intern, just as JFK did.

What the Democrats do is a disgrace against all women who actually are victims. They don't get taken seriously because of the Democrat's lies for political purposes.

Of course, the worst abusers of women are mostly liberal Democrats, so maybe there's a reason for that.