SoMs Eagle
Heisman
Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
|
RE: Gummy: FBI couldn’t prove Trump-Russia collusion before Mueller appointment
(09-17-2018 11:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (09-16-2018 01:25 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (09-16-2018 09:15 AM)TechRocks Wrote: Quote:“It’s a reflection of us still not knowing,” Page told Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) when questioned about texts she and Strzok exchanged in May 2017 as Robert Mueller was being named a special prosecutor to take over the Russia investigation.
With that statement, Page acknowledged a momentous fact: After nine months of using some of the most awesome surveillance powers afforded to U.S. intelligence, the FBI still had not made a case connecting Trump or his campaign to Russia’s election meddling.
Page opined further, acknowledging “it still existed in the scope of possibility that there would be literally nothing” to connect Trump and Russia, no matter what Mueller or the FBI did.
“As far as May of 2017, we still couldn’t answer the question,” she said at another point.
Shortly after he was fired, ex-FBI Director James Comey told the Senate there was not yet evidence to justify investigating Trump for colluding with Russia. “When I left, we did not have an investigation focused on President Trump,” Comey testified.
And Strzok, the counterintelligence boss and leader of the Russia probe, texted Page in May 2017 that he was reluctant to join Mueller’s probe and leave his senior FBI post because he feared “there’s no big there, there.”
So, by the words of Comey, Strzok and Page, we now know that the Trump Justice Department — through Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — unleashed the Mueller special prosecutor probe before the FBI could validate a connection between Trump and Russia.
Which raises the question: If there was no concrete evidence of collusion, why did we need a special prosecutor?
http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/406881-...re-mueller
Or what was the evidence used to get a FISA warrant on Trump campaign? ..and furthermore----why were those FISA warrants renewed multiple times?
What FISA warrant on the trump campaign?
One problem with the left is you simply don’t understand how the FISA warrant works. Or do you and you’re just being obtuse?
|
|
09-19-2018 07:57 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,955
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7063
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Gummy: FBI couldn’t prove Trump-Russia collusion before Mueller appointment
(09-19-2018 07:57 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote: (09-17-2018 11:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (09-16-2018 01:25 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (09-16-2018 09:15 AM)TechRocks Wrote: Quote:“It’s a reflection of us still not knowing,” Page told Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) when questioned about texts she and Strzok exchanged in May 2017 as Robert Mueller was being named a special prosecutor to take over the Russia investigation.
With that statement, Page acknowledged a momentous fact: After nine months of using some of the most awesome surveillance powers afforded to U.S. intelligence, the FBI still had not made a case connecting Trump or his campaign to Russia’s election meddling.
Page opined further, acknowledging “it still existed in the scope of possibility that there would be literally nothing” to connect Trump and Russia, no matter what Mueller or the FBI did.
“As far as May of 2017, we still couldn’t answer the question,” she said at another point.
Shortly after he was fired, ex-FBI Director James Comey told the Senate there was not yet evidence to justify investigating Trump for colluding with Russia. “When I left, we did not have an investigation focused on President Trump,” Comey testified.
And Strzok, the counterintelligence boss and leader of the Russia probe, texted Page in May 2017 that he was reluctant to join Mueller’s probe and leave his senior FBI post because he feared “there’s no big there, there.”
So, by the words of Comey, Strzok and Page, we now know that the Trump Justice Department — through Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — unleashed the Mueller special prosecutor probe before the FBI could validate a connection between Trump and Russia.
Which raises the question: If there was no concrete evidence of collusion, why did we need a special prosecutor?
http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/406881-...re-mueller
Or what was the evidence used to get a FISA warrant on Trump campaign? ..and furthermore----why were those FISA warrants renewed multiple times?
What FISA warrant on the trump campaign?
One problem with the left is you simply don’t understand how the FISA warrant works. Or do you and you’re just being obtuse?
naw man....they simply don't care about law and how it SHOULD be ADMINISTERED.....
this is where they go south in today's world....
fk dems....
|
|
09-19-2018 08:12 AM |
|