...after 4 weeks...

1 Alabama
2 Stanford
3 LSU
4 Georgia
5 Duke
6 Notre Dame
7 Penn State
8 Oklahoma
9 Clemson
10 Kentucky
11 Syracuse
12 Buffalo
13 California
14 South Florida
15 North Texas
16 Ohio State
17 West Virginia
18 Cincinnati
19 South Carolina
20 UCF
21 Mississippi
22 Texas Tech
23 San Diego State
24 Miami
25 NC State

so UCF, USF and UC have 2 opportunities remaining for big wins or quality losses.

Last three games for each of those teams...

Cincinnati: USF, UCF, ECU
USF: Cincinnati, Temple, UCF
UCF: Navy, Cincinnati, USF

Great final three weeks of the regular season for the conference.

(09-24-2018 08:40 AM)Meatwad Wrote:  so UCF, USF and UC have 2 opportunities remaining for big wins or quality losses.

Meanwhile Temple has three opportunities for quality wins!

(09-24-2018 08:48 AM)TampaTom Wrote:  Last three games for each of those teams...

Cincinnati: USF, UCF, ECU
USF: Cincinnati, Temple, UCF
UCF: Navy, Cincinnati, USF

Great final three weeks of the regular season for the conference.

Wow. Scheduling worked out really well. All three could start 9-0.

all- compiters have bias, bias in design, by its creator ...favoring things that may or may not benefit certain programs

for example s&p+ uses recruit raking and thus never has a g5 top 40 preseason ...

this is why all computers have different results

back to your regularly scheduled programs

Careful or you'll risk a dog whistle to the MWAC crowd.

(09-24-2018 08:48 AM)vick mike Wrote:  

(09-24-2018 08:40 AM)Meatwad Wrote:  so UCF, USF and UC have 2 opportunities remaining for big wins or quality losses.

Meanwhile Temple has three opportunities for quality wins!

I like the way you think...

(09-24-2018 08:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(09-24-2018 08:48 AM)TampaTom Wrote:  Last three games for each of those teams...

Cincinnati: USF, UCF, ECU
USF: Cincinnati, Temple, UCF
UCF: Navy, Cincinnati, USF

Great final three weeks of the regular season for the conference.

Wow. Scheduling worked out really well. All three could start 9-0.

USF and UCF could start 9-0. We're due at least a loss or two (after this weekend).

(09-24-2018 08:57 AM)pesik Wrote:  all- compiters have bias, bias in design, by its creator ...favoring things that may or may not benefit certain programs

for example s&p+ uses recruit raking and thus never has a g5 top 40 preseason ...

this is why all computers have different results

back to your regularly scheduled programs

Colley's Bias Free Matrix Rankings
An Official Bowl Championship Series Ranking for 2001–2013

Advantages in this Method
First and foremost, the rankings are based only on results from the field , with absolutely no influence from opinion, past performance, tradition or any other bias factor. This is why there is no pre-season poll here. All teams are assumed equal at the beginning of the year. If you include some kind of human input, what's the point of a computer poll in the first place? Garbage in, garbage out.

Read more @ http://www.colleyrankings.com/advan.html

(09-24-2018 08:57 AM)pesik Wrote:  all- compiters have bias, bias in design, by its creator ...favoring things that may or may not benefit certain programs

for example s&p+ uses recruit raking and thus never has a g5 top 40 preseason ...

this is why all computers have different results

back to your regularly scheduled programs

There were 3 G5 in the preseason top forty for S/P+. (Memphis was just outside at 42).

Also recruiting ranking gets phased out with increasing speed. It's a small fraction now, and will be eliminated completely within a few weeks when the projections get no weight.

Right now UCF, Memphis and Boise are all top 22 according to S/P+.

It's way too early to be ranking any team anyway.

...after 5 weeks...

1 LSU
2 Notre Dame
3 Clemson
4 Georgia
5 Alabama
6 Kentucky
7 Oklahoma
8 Ohio State
9 Stanford
10 NC State
11 West Virginia
12 South Florida
13 Texas
14 Cincinnati
15 UCF
16 Auburn
17 Penn State
18 U of Miami
19 Michigan
20 Washington
21 Indiana
22 Duke
23 Syracuse
24 Louisiana Tech
25 Florida

Creepin up!

he updated it because clemson was listed there twice, 5 was suppose to be bama.

Thanks, fixed!