XLance
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14,231
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 762
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
RE: Anyone know a good source for ACC tv ratings over the last 10 seasons?
(10-26-2018 08:03 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 12:59 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: So if the top 6 teams in terms of ratings are FSU, Clemson, VT, GT, Miami, and L'ville if the SEC were to add them how much value do they bring to the table?
To answer this question I think you have to ask "How much does losing them devalue the ACC?"
Well, how much do you think this conference is worth?:
BC
UConn*
Syracuse
Pitt
Cincy*
UVA
UNC
NC St
WF
Duke
USF*
UCF*
I'm guessing third to a quarter of what the ACC was worth before because all of the big draws and playoff contenders are gone. It's value might even be nearly as low as the American. I'd say those 6 would dramatically increase the value of the SEC because you can safely add at least 2/3rds of the value of the old ACC contract and then some because you have a total strangle hold on the Southeast and control the lions share of nationally appealing content.
I try and not to stir up sh!t too much, but if I were a Big Ten fan I might be more worried about what could happen if the SEC adds Texas and Oklahoma, while Wake decides to stop competing at the highest level and ND, PSU, and MD join the ACC leaving the Big Ten confined to the dying Midwest and forever destroying Delany's vision of owning the northeast corridor?
I suspect that just might be ESPN's ultimate goal.
All in good fun.
Cheers,
Neil
Neil, what happens to Rutgers?
|
|
10-26-2018 08:25 PM |
|
OrangeDude
Special Teams
Posts: 870
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 123
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:
|
RE: Anyone know a good source for ACC tv ratings over the last 10 seasons?
(10-26-2018 08:25 PM)XLance Wrote: (10-26-2018 08:03 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 12:59 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: So if the top 6 teams in terms of ratings are FSU, Clemson, VT, GT, Miami, and L'ville if the SEC were to add them how much value do they bring to the table?
To answer this question I think you have to ask "How much does losing them devalue the ACC?"
Well, how much do you think this conference is worth?:
BC
UConn*
Syracuse
Pitt
Cincy*
UVA
UNC
NC St
WF
Duke
USF*
UCF*
I'm guessing third to a quarter of what the ACC was worth before because all of the big draws and playoff contenders are gone. It's value might even be nearly as low as the American. I'd say those 6 would dramatically increase the value of the SEC because you can safely add at least 2/3rds of the value of the old ACC contract and then some because you have a total strangle hold on the Southeast and control the lions share of nationally appealing content.
I try and not stir up sh!t too much, but if I were a Big Ten fan I might be more worried about what could happen if the SEC adds Texas and Oklahoma, while Wake decides to stop competing at the highest level and ND, PSU, and MD join the ACC leaving the Big Ten confined to the dying Midwest and forever destroying Delany's vision of owning the northeast corridor?
I suspect that just might be ESPN's ultimate goal.
All in good fun.
Cheers,
Neil
Neil, what happens to Rutgers?
I see what you did there.
Trying to make me stir up more sh!t my friend.
Cheers,
Neil
|
|
10-26-2018 09:09 PM |
|
Fighting Muskie
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
Posts: 11,790
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 789
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
|
RE: Anyone know a good source for ACC tv ratings over the last 10 seasons?
(10-26-2018 08:03 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 12:59 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: So if the top 6 teams in terms of ratings are FSU, Clemson, VT, GT, Miami, and L'ville if the SEC were to add them how much value do they bring to the table?
To answer this question I think you have to ask "How much does losing them devalue the ACC?"
Well, how much do you think this conference is worth?:
BC
UConn*
Syracuse
Pitt
Cincy*
UVA
UNC
NC St
WF
Duke
USF*
UCF*
I'm guessing third to a quarter of what the ACC was worth before because all of the big draws and playoff contenders are gone. It's value might even be nearly as low as the American. I'd say those 6 would dramatically increase the value of the SEC because you can safely add at least 2/3rds of the value of the old ACC contract and then some because you have a total strangle hold on the Southeast and control the lions share of nationally appealing content.
I try and not stir up sh!t too much, but if I were a Big Ten fan I might be more worried about what could happen if the SEC adds Texas and Oklahoma, while Wake decides to stop competing at the highest level and ND, PSU, and MD join the ACC leaving the Big Ten confined to the dying Midwest and forever destroying Delany's vision of owning the northeast corridor?
I suspect that just might be ESPN's ultimate goal.
All in good fun.
Cheers,
Neil
Never happening but if the SEC makes a blockbuster move my hope is that the Big Ten would lure the best of the Pac 12.
|
|
10-26-2018 09:16 PM |
|
OrangeDude
Special Teams
Posts: 870
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 123
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:
|
RE: Anyone know a good source for ACC tv ratings over the last 10 seasons?
(10-26-2018 09:16 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: (10-26-2018 08:03 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 12:59 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: So if the top 6 teams in terms of ratings are FSU, Clemson, VT, GT, Miami, and L'ville if the SEC were to add them how much value do they bring to the table?
To answer this question I think you have to ask "How much does losing them devalue the ACC?"
Well, how much do you think this conference is worth?:
BC
UConn*
Syracuse
Pitt
Cincy*
UVA
UNC
NC St
WF
Duke
USF*
UCF*
I'm guessing third to a quarter of what the ACC was worth before because all of the big draws and playoff contenders are gone. It's value might even be nearly as low as the American. I'd say those 6 would dramatically increase the value of the SEC because you can safely add at least 2/3rds of the value of the old ACC contract and then some because you have a total strangle hold on the Southeast and control the lions share of nationally appealing content.
I try and not stir up sh!t too much, but if I were a Big Ten fan I might be more worried about what could happen if the SEC adds Texas and Oklahoma, while Wake decides to stop competing at the highest level and ND, PSU, and MD join the ACC leaving the Big Ten confined to the dying Midwest and forever destroying Delany's vision of owning the northeast corridor?
I suspect that just might be ESPN's ultimate goal.
All in good fun.
Cheers,
Neil
Never happening but if the SEC makes a blockbuster move my hope is that the Big Ten would lure the best of the Pac 12.
Extremely unlikely to happen? Sure. But never say never. A few Big Ten officials hinted at the last expansion that PSU was getting "roving eyes" and I don't think the 10 old members (and certainly their fans) have been too happy with the additions of either Maryland or Rutgers. But again, extremely unlikely. End of my sh!t talking.
Cheers,
Neil
|
|
10-26-2018 09:26 PM |
|
Fighting Muskie
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
Posts: 11,790
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 789
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
|
RE: Anyone know a good source for ACC tv ratings over the last 10 seasons?
(10-26-2018 09:09 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 08:25 PM)XLance Wrote: (10-26-2018 08:03 PM)OrangeDude Wrote: (10-26-2018 12:59 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: So if the top 6 teams in terms of ratings are FSU, Clemson, VT, GT, Miami, and L'ville if the SEC were to add them how much value do they bring to the table?
To answer this question I think you have to ask "How much does losing them devalue the ACC?"
Well, how much do you think this conference is worth?:
BC
UConn*
Syracuse
Pitt
Cincy*
UVA
UNC
NC St
WF
Duke
USF*
UCF*
I'm guessing third to a quarter of what the ACC was worth before because all of the big draws and playoff contenders are gone. It's value might even be nearly as low as the American. I'd say those 6 would dramatically increase the value of the SEC because you can safely add at least 2/3rds of the value of the old ACC contract and then some because you have a total strangle hold on the Southeast and control the lions share of nationally appealing content.
I try and not stir up sh!t too much, but if I were a Big Ten fan I might be more worried about what could happen if the SEC adds Texas and Oklahoma, while Wake decides to stop competing at the highest level and ND, PSU, and MD join the ACC leaving the Big Ten confined to the dying Midwest and forever destroying Delany's vision of owning the northeast corridor?
I suspect that just might be ESPN's ultimate goal.
All in good fun.
Cheers,
Neil
Neil, what happens to Rutgers?
I see what you did there.
Trying to make me stir up more sh!t my friend.
Cheers,
Neil
On behalf of Jim Delany I'd like to offer you Rutgers free of charge, no exit fees. We will throw in Maryland in for the trouble.
|
|
10-26-2018 09:32 PM |
|