(03-30-2019 11:09 PM)MUther Wrote: (03-30-2019 07:57 PM)_sturt_ Wrote: Interesting, at least to me. So, I'm sure he doesn't want to be proven a liar later, but did he give any insight to his source for saying it?
Even when you're being basically innocuous you sound like a tool. I didn't think that was possible. Can't you just say "mistaken" instead of "proven a liar." Worlds apart in tone and meaning.
I'm not sure what innocuous means. Can you help me out?
More seriously, I swear, sometimes a person can just try to have an innocent conversation with other people, but it stimulates some to chime in with whatever "smart" remarks they can generate in the pursuit of asserting their own superiority.
I wish one day I could sit across from some of these people and just ask "What's your damn problem?," and get a straight answer. There's no excuse for grown ass adults to need this kind of reassurance that they matter.
Most of us come to something like this to debate content and substance. Or, as in this case, to just ask an honest question, and get some information, and even maybe ask a follow-up to understand the source. But when you start the personal attack crap, sure maybe a few similarly-postured friends chuckle, but how can you be so oblivious to how juvenile and petty... and, ironically enough, fighting your own inferiority complex... you come off?
Patently ridiculous.
And circling back to the point of the thread....
Not every Herd fan can say he's been a D'Antoni proponent from Day One, but I'm one of those. To try to twist my phrasing to suggest I was passively aggressively taking a shot at him is its own kind of twisted. Rather, it's a legitimate question to ask the first question. It's also legitimate to ask for the basis/primary sourcing for whatever answer comes back... mind you, I know every single Marshall fan is too intelligent to ever do this, but I've heard of others' fans taking as-gospel what other fans have told them they heard, or what some local columnist said his "sources" told him, only to find out later that it wasn't actually so.
Go stalk someone else. And you should be careful as you do that. They don't appear to be nearly as content to put up with your mfing anti-Christ attack posts, or to be moved by any whiny mob efforts.
I'm just here to talk substance. Maybe ask a question here and there. Maybe challenge arguments on occasion.
But disrespecting people and sermonizing to them about how they ought to word their sentences and questions isn't on my agenda. I'm content to just be average, neither superior nor inferior. What the hell does superiority on some internet message board do for anyone anyway? I dunno.
Superiority of argument is a whole other thing though. Sometimes, one argument is better than another. Sometimes, a certain way of thinking or behavior is superior to another. Those are conversations we come to places like this to have, and legitimately so. But insult contests? Pretending that one person's "idiot" insult is worth 20 points, and the other person's "clown" insult is worth 10? That's it's own commentary on the people who go in for that kind of thing.