TerryD
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15,001
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 935
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
|
RE: USF gets a decided schematic advantage
(12-24-2019 11:34 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 11:02 AM)e-parade Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:28 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:12 AM)e-parade Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:03 AM)bullet Wrote: There's the alternative argument, that admitting them creates another competitor for Florida talent. Some people were opposed to Houston joining the Big 12 for that reason, more competition for Texas talent.
I think that's why a common thought is the B12 taking them if they ever decide to expand - to get access to Florida recruits and take them away from the SEC/ACC. Strengthen themselves and weaken their competitors at once.
The Big 12 doesn't recruit a lot in Florida. WVU and ISU get some. Its pretty minimal elsewhere. All the ACC, SEC and Big 10 schools recruit Florida.
And if the B12 had UCF and USF...
It might change KU & KSU's recruiting and help in Florida for ISU and WVU. Don't really see it changing the recruiting of the Texas and Oklahoma schools.
John Mackovic at Texas tried to recruit Florida and it just didn't work, but he succeeded in California (now a lot of that could be wine and cheese John couldn't relate to beer and burgers Florida, but there was just an east of the Mississippi mentality). Charlie Strong got 3 highly rated recruits from Florida one year with his Florida ties. One didn't show up. One went home after a week. The 3rd just never panned out-he became a 2nd/3rd string WR (John Burt).
ND had made the decision a few years ago to recruit Georgia and the Carolinas more and recruit Florida less.
It was the Florida kids who caused ND the most trouble academically and off the field.
|
|
12-25-2019 09:16 AM |
|
Wolfman
All American
Posts: 4,465
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 181
I Root For: The Cartel
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
RE: USF gets a decided schematic advantage
I don't see the "scheme" connection. You hire the best you can get.
If Weis is as good as he seems he'll be gone in a couple of years anyway.
|
|
12-25-2019 09:06 PM |
|
sierrajip
Heisman
Posts: 5,706
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 189
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: USF gets a decided schematic advantage
(12-24-2019 11:34 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 11:02 AM)e-parade Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:28 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:12 AM)e-parade Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:03 AM)bullet Wrote: There's the alternative argument, that admitting them creates another competitor for Florida talent. Some people were opposed to Houston joining the Big 12 for that reason, more competition for Texas talent.
I think that's why a common thought is the B12 taking them if they ever decide to expand - to get access to Florida recruits and take them away from the SEC/ACC. Strengthen themselves and weaken their competitors at once.
The Big 12 doesn't recruit a lot in Florida. WVU and ISU get some. Its pretty minimal elsewhere. All the ACC, SEC and Big 10 schools recruit Florida.
And if the B12 had UCF and USF...
It might change KU & KSU's recruiting and help in Florida for ISU and WVU. Don't really see it changing the recruiting of Texas and Oklahoma.
John Mackovic at Texas tried to recruit Florida and it just didn't work, but he succeeded in California (now a lot of that could be wine and cheese John couldn't relate to beer and burgers Florida, but there was just an east of the Mississippi mentality). Charlie Strong got 3 highly rated recruits from Florida one year with his Florida ties. One didn't show up. One went home after a week. The 3rd just never panned out-he became a 2nd/3rd string WR (John Burt).
FIFY
|
|
12-26-2019 04:49 AM |
|
bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,890
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3317
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: USF gets a decided schematic advantage
(12-26-2019 04:49 AM)sierrajip Wrote: (12-24-2019 11:34 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 11:02 AM)e-parade Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:28 AM)bullet Wrote: (12-24-2019 10:12 AM)e-parade Wrote: I think that's why a common thought is the B12 taking them if they ever decide to expand - to get access to Florida recruits and take them away from the SEC/ACC. Strengthen themselves and weaken their competitors at once.
The Big 12 doesn't recruit a lot in Florida. WVU and ISU get some. Its pretty minimal elsewhere. All the ACC, SEC and Big 10 schools recruit Florida.
And if the B12 had UCF and USF...
It might change KU & KSU's recruiting and help in Florida for ISU and WVU. Don't really see it changing the recruiting of Texas and Oklahoma.
John Mackovic at Texas tried to recruit Florida and it just didn't work, but he succeeded in California (now a lot of that could be wine and cheese John couldn't relate to beer and burgers Florida, but there was just an east of the Mississippi mentality). Charlie Strong got 3 highly rated recruits from Florida one year with his Florida ties. One didn't show up. One went home after a week. The 3rd just never panned out-he became a 2nd/3rd string WR (John Burt).
FIFY
Your fix is wrong. Texas Tech, Baylor, TCU and Oklahoma St. aren't going to start recruiting heavily in Florida. Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma are much more lucrative for them than far away and heavily recruited Florida.
|
|
12-26-2019 11:18 AM |
|