UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
|
08-01-2022 11:10 AM |
|
Blazer B
Water Engineer
Posts: 45
Joined: Jun 2022
Reputation: 16
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(08-01-2022 09:23 AM)GreenBison Wrote: (07-27-2022 09:45 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote: (07-27-2022 09:13 PM)Monarch Pride Wrote: (07-27-2022 08:54 PM)Cubanbull1 Wrote: (07-27-2022 08:40 PM)Monarch Pride Wrote: The market and economics are still very fluid wouldn’t you say? Like any market, certain stocks are rising while others are declining. The AAC’s value is certainly changing as it loses Houston and Cincy, while adding CUSA teams to fill the void after being rebuffed by more desirable teams out west. I’m not sure a second fiddle choice will eventually be very appealing to ESPN or any other major sports network. Are you following sailor what the next ten years most likely hold?
That’s the best you can do when the facts show the truth?
Care to explain? You don’t understand or foresee the market dynamics and the shifts that are occurring? I’m guessing you don’t understand much if you don’t see what is on the horizon. But let me spell it out for you. The remaining premium schools in the AAC are going to leave (SMU, Memphis) and then you are going to be left with CUSA table scraps when it’s time to renegotiate your contract - with no leverage. Any of that resonate? If not, explain the flaw in my logic. Or is all you have?
Something I've observed lately: those speaking doom for the AAC almost always have to posit SMU, Memphis, and/or USF leaving in more realignment chaos, and Navy going independent (an unlikelihood I've discussed elsewhere) or Wichita State going to the A10, and THEN they'll be better than the AAC!!@!
It's like they know in their heart of hearts that even after losing three of our top programs, we STILL haven't dropped to their level.
As far as scraps...
The AAC took the last five consecutive CUSA football champs.
Average 2021 Massey Composite final ranking of AAC's CUSA additions: 84.17
Average 2021 Massey Composite final ranking of SBC's CUSA additions: 98.67
If we got "scraps" what does that make you?
Could more bad things happen to the AAC in realignment? Sure, but that is far from a given.
Until that point, yes, we've lost our clear advantage, head and shoulders above the G4. Closer to parity, now, so it's time to get up off the mat and rebuild our P6 advantage. But with enormous financial advantages over the G4, and stability in our ESPN deal, and incomparable exposure on ABC and ESPN, we just might be better positioned than in 2014. Future contracts? Just the structure of current deals nearly ensures that our viewership will remain better than the Sun Belt and therefore our future contracts will be better than the Sun Belt.
I'm concerned about the mwc, or even just one mwc team surging in 2023-25 as the new CFP is designed.
I'm not concerned about the Sun Belt at all.
Have a nice summer.
2010 - 2021
Using AP for rankings
Marshall
9 Winning Seasons
9 Bowl Games
6 - 3 Bowl record
Ranked 2 times - AP 15 and AP 18 - Finished season at AP 23
Winning Record versus AAC6
USM
7 Winning Seasons
5 Bowl Games
2-3 Bowl Record
Ranked 1 time - AP 20 - Finished season at AP 20
Winning Record versus AAC6
ODU
2 Winning Seasons
2 Bowl Games
1-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
------------------------------------------
Charlotte
1 Winning Season
1 Bowl Game
0-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
FAU
3 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
2-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
UTSA
5 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
0-3 Bowl Record
Ranked 1 time - AP 15 - Finished season unranked
UAB
6 Winning Seasons
4 Bowl Games
2-2 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
North Texas
3 Winning Seasons
6 Bowl Games
1-5 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
Rice
3 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
2-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
USM has lost 8 of the last 10 to UAB and Marshall and ODU have zero wins against UAB since UAB football came back.
I am way more concerned with where we are and where we are headed vs where we have been.
|
|
08-01-2022 11:11 AM |
|
Engblazr
Special Teams
Posts: 569
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 60
I Root For: UAB
Location: Birmingham
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(08-01-2022 11:03 AM)everyone Wrote: (08-01-2022 10:56 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-01-2022 10:25 AM)GreenBison Wrote: (08-01-2022 09:37 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-01-2022 09:23 AM)GreenBison Wrote: 2010 - 2021
Using AP for rankings
Marshall
9 Winning Seasons
9 Bowl Games
6 - 3 Bowl record
Ranked 2 times - AP 15 and AP 18 - Finished season at AP 23
Winning Record versus AAC6
USM
7 Winning Seasons
5 Bowl Games
2-3 Bowl Record
Ranked 1 time - AP 20 - Finished season at AP 20
Winning Record versus AAC6
ODU
2 Winning Seasons
2 Bowl Games
1-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
------------------------------------------
Charlotte
1 Winning Season
1 Bowl Game
0-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
FAU
3 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
2-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
UTSA
5 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
0-3 Bowl Record
Ranked 1 time - AP 15 - Finished season unranked
UAB
6 Winning Seasons
4 Bowl Games
2-2 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
North Texas
3 Winning Seasons
6 Bowl Games
1-5 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
Rice
3 Winning Seasons
3 Bowl Games
2-1 Bowl Record
Never Ranked
Actually, USM does not have a winning record against UTSA...
It's a 4 - 4 tie
http://www.winsipedia.com/southern-miss/vs/utsa
Correct, my point still stands.
In addition, USM also does not have a winning record against UAB, UAB leads at 7 wins to 2.
2-2 versus Charlotte
1-1 versus FAU
North Texas leads the series at 5-4....
11-8 against UAB...I know you young programs don't know the tradition of the sport and all but it matters...we won 9 straight against UAB at one point. A down decade of USM football and we still lead the all time series against UAB.
Bragging about an all time record of 11-8 against UAB isn’t the flex you think it is. UAB was straight up horrible from birth until 2014. And the y’all are still 11-8 all time.
And back to his numbers, the period he was referencing was 2010-2021. I get Mississippi reading comprehension isn’t the best, but that’s the context. Which leads to…. the period of UAB football that was so atrocious that they literally shut the entire program down, 2010-2014, UAB went 3-1 against USM…. Also 36-19 all time against y’all in shooty hoops.
|
|
08-01-2022 11:16 AM |
|
ghostofclt!
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,445
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation: 7474
I Root For: Charlotte
Location: n/a
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
clt hopes that one day, the lowly sunbelt folks will go away. Far away.
|
|
08-01-2022 04:15 PM |
|
everyone
Special Teams
Posts: 890
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 96
I Root For: USM
Location:
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(08-01-2022 11:16 AM)Engblazr Wrote: (08-01-2022 11:03 AM)everyone Wrote: (08-01-2022 10:56 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-01-2022 10:25 AM)GreenBison Wrote: (08-01-2022 09:37 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: Actually, USM does not have a winning record against UTSA...
It's a 4 - 4 tie
http://www.winsipedia.com/southern-miss/vs/utsa
Correct, my point still stands.
In addition, USM also does not have a winning record against UAB, UAB leads at 7 wins to 2.
2-2 versus Charlotte
1-1 versus FAU
North Texas leads the series at 5-4....
11-8 against UAB...I know you young programs don't know the tradition of the sport and all but it matters...we won 9 straight against UAB at one point. A down decade of USM football and we still lead the all time series against UAB.
Bragging about an all time record of 11-8 against UAB isn’t the flex you think it is. UAB was straight up horrible from birth until 2014. And the y’all are still 11-8 all time.
And back to his numbers, the period he was referencing was 2010-2021. I get Mississippi reading comprehension isn’t the best, but that’s the context. Which leads to…. the period of UAB football that was so atrocious that they literally shut the entire program down, 2010-2014, UAB went 3-1 against USM…. Also 36-19 all time against y’all in shooty hoops.
I read it using my Nashville brain I guess...must be that U of A institution south of Birmingham that let you re-start your program but could kill it again anytime they like and I did mention the bad decade of football for us...UAB had more than a bad decade and literally no program for a while. Not much success at all for UAB compared to USM.
|
|
08-01-2022 04:37 PM |
|
sierrajip
Heisman
Posts: 5,706
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 189
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(07-30-2022 08:19 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: (07-30-2022 08:17 PM)Cubanbull1 Wrote: (07-30-2022 08:15 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote: You guys do realize that the AAC contract with ESPN will be renegotiated once Ciny, UCF and Houston leave, right? Like, seriously. You DO know this I hope. I can assure you, within 3 years, AAC will be sucking hind teat. just like CUSA is now. ECU and likely Memphis will be committed to the SBC by then as well.
LOL. Obviously you missed the memo that it was already settled. Try harder
Exactly, things change. Glad you convinced yourself it will never change again.
I would rather be in the AAC's place. ESPiN still has them under contract for the next decade, and don't see that much of a change for the SBC to overtake with everything going on with realignment. I am worried about the Big12 without a contract after 2025.
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2022 05:08 PM by sierrajip.)
|
|
08-01-2022 05:07 PM |
|
mtmedlin
I came, I saw, I wasn't impressed.
Posts: 4,824
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 183
I Root For: USF & Naps
Location: Tierra Verde
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
The SBC just got an extension... with no added money.
This debate is over.
|
|
08-02-2022 08:34 AM |
|
mturn017
ODU Homer
Posts: 16,796
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1603
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location: Roanoke, VA
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(08-02-2022 08:34 AM)mtmedlin Wrote: The SBC just got an extension... with no added money.
This debate is over.
What? They got an extension last year (to take effect this year) that brought the revenue from 500k to reportedly about 1.2M starting and it was announced during media days that the contract was amended to increase the number of linear games and additional “financial resources”. There’s nothing concrete about the details as they’re still getting ironed out. Some rumors that it will end up close to 2M
The two conferences are not in the same place for sure but the SB added 4 programs and the contract was adjusted to add more games and per school money while the AAC added 6 teams and the contract stayed the same but divided by more teams.
So I guess it depends on what you’re debating.
|
|
08-02-2022 08:53 AM |
|
CoastalJuan
Business Drunk
Posts: 6,966
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 526
I Root For: ECU
Location: Right near da beeach
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(08-02-2022 08:53 AM)mturn017 Wrote: (08-02-2022 08:34 AM)mtmedlin Wrote: The SBC just got an extension... with no added money.
This debate is over.
What? They got an extension last year (to take effect this year) that brought the revenue from 500k to reportedly about 1.2M starting and it was announced during media days that the contract was amended to increase the number of linear games and additional “financial resources”. There’s nothing concrete about the details as they’re still getting ironed out. Some rumors that it will end up close to 2M
The two conferences are not in the same place for sure but the SB added 4 programs and the contract was adjusted to add more games and per school money while the AAC added 6 teams and the contract stayed the same but divided by more teams.
So I guess it depends on what you’re debating.
Sold
|
|
08-02-2022 08:56 AM |
|
KnightLight
Legend
Posts: 27,664
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 700
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
For UCF Athletics fiscal year July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022:
|
|
08-02-2022 05:05 PM |
|
Sideshow2313
1st String
Posts: 1,642
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 44
I Root For: UCF
Location:
|
RE: Updated G5 revenue
(07-30-2022 10:33 PM)goodknightfl Wrote: The AAC is and will continue to be the best of the rest. Is is possible the MWC gets closer? YES. Will the Belt gain or pass CUSA and MAC, yes. Will the belt catch or pass the MWC or AAC? No.
This is the correct post, in fan perspective, money, recruiting and overall football.
|
|
08-02-2022 07:30 PM |
|